green Profile picture
11 Sep, 10 tweets, 3 min read
So apparently H in TESLA stands for Honesty and I is for Integrity.

I got a "lease balance" bill on June 13th that amongst other things billed me $1064 for excess mileage, $1200 for "excess wear and tear", $395 disposition fee, some taxes and so on (don't have a picture handy)
This was sort of surprising since I
1. returned the lease on March 20 (so 3 months/12 weeks ago)
2. it was inspected on the spot by Tesla and declared in good condition
3. I was told that nothing is due and even signed some paper to that effect (somehow forgot to take a picture)
Naturally I emailed Tesla the same day seeing WTDF is going on and asking for a copy of the paperwork from lease return.
On Aug 3rd I got my reply-non-reply (meanwhile like clockwork I was getting automated nags to pay the bill)
So I shoot the other alias a question about the alleged damage and asking for pictures the same day.
I also let them know the other charges are also BS.

Today I get my reply demonstrating the headline tweet.
So the $2734.28 magically got reduced to $1300. I also got my picture (below) and admission that it actually cost 1200 to fix the alleged damage, not $600. ok.
so I check the picture AND it's the picture I took at lease return!
the "scratch" is a string of spiderweb with dust
you can even see the spot where I rubbed it with my finger and in that spot the "scratch" magically got erased!

So it almost looks like an order came in June to pull out all stops to extract as much money as possible from everywhere to show "profitability"
And one of the sources was trolling lease returns pictures for signs of "obvious damage" or whatever to try and milk people for $$$ (everybody knows Tesla does NOT refurbish cars before selling them as preowned at this point I hope) or they'd have some sort of a work order
and knew how much things would cost when fixed (not the "seat of the pants estimate based on some random pictures").

They also conveniently forgot to subtract the mileage when calculating excess one and forgot they are not supposed to charge the disposition fee...
Let's see what their next reply in November going to be I guess.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with green

green Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @greentheonly

24 May
As more and more people have their premium connectivity trial expiring, I keep getting this question about how to make hotspots more tolerable and make wifi stay on even as you shift into gear.

What many don't know is in the past there was a special "tether" flag on a wifi AP,
It would be set on any AP that you would "forcefully" connect to after shifting into gear and then enabling wifi.
Wifi would stay on if connected to such AP

Then it all stopped working sparking theories from people that knew about it if it was deliberate.

I set out to research.
It turns out as model3 code was developed, old QtCarNetManager code was dropped and rewritten as QtCarConnMan by apparently a different person (new hire?) unfamilar with the codebase, so they totally ignored all the existing tether infrastructure and forced wifi disconnect in D
Read 5 tweets
11 Apr
I got some flack last time for how my typical highway speeds are wrong to measure Tesla energy consumption.
So I decided to do a bit of a cosplay of the "typical slow Tesla". I set TACC to 75mph (all around reasonable hwy speed I hope).
Car is my new Tesla X LR+
No level ground here so did a 70 miles trip 35 miles each way, taking measurements along the way. In the telemetry picture you can see the speed was constant at 75 except where I turned around.
Elevation change 276m->316m->212m->312m->276m so should be all valid
On the first leg of the trip going downhill and dropping 70m of altitude I recorded 331Wh/mi at 75mph.
Read 7 tweets
20 Feb
As I have a bit of DM explosion lately about possibility of various major changes coming out of Tesla soon, here's the general take for everybody interested to consult:
TLDR, something major is brewing ,but I don't know when.

1. back in 2019 they suddenly froze their releases
on 2019.40 branch and only backported essential stuff there - presumably to prevent leakage. Meanwhile updates slowed to a crawl. Eventually 2020.4 was released over a month from previous release and already leaked some info.
now it starts to look like they'll freeze on 2020.4
as is evidenced by 2020.4.10 getting out with some very limited changes (remains to be seen if this is going to be a trend).
We have seen a similar trend play out in early 2019 where 19.4 was released in late Jan and 19.8 was released in March as preparations for hw3 launch were
Read 12 tweets
20 Dec 19
So it's end of the year, time to cheer, right? So let's go onto a wild speculation trail should we?
Remember, this is all unconfirmed speculation. I'll try to provide some other background where necessary as we go.

Tesla moves in unknown ways and none of that may come to life
When Model 3 was introduced it sported a very different "gateway" computer (this is where the car config is stored), instead of old style text file it is now a set of opaque binary registers with values so it was sort of hard to know what meant what.
It was curious that MCU2 reused the oldstyle gateway with a text file config. (internally it was called MCU-transitionary, so clearly it's just a transition to something better, but I digress).
Read 16 tweets
6 Dec 19
So what did the car actually see?
Well, it turns out at first it looked like an obstacle so it slowed down some, then it decided that nah, there's nothing and lifted it's "foot" off the brakes, huh?
Radar to AP: "there's something! stop! STOP!"
AP to itself: "what's this yelling? I don't really see anything dangerous, keep moving"

BTW see that disengagement before the impact? I did not do it!
Now we wondered what would happen if we remove the foil? Well, pretty much the same thing only this time autopilot actually sped up before impact after initially slowing down some and did not disengage until I stomped on the brakes.
Read 10 tweets
6 Dec 19
Thanks to @telanon finding a nice test ground, providing test equipment and convincing Sir Steady to volunteer himself as a test subject.

We'll try to test how AP avoids obstacles and pedestrians which was a hot topic of debate recently. The results are controversial
For those in the ADAS camp the safety features are mostly good in particular, for those in the totally anti-AP camp, there's going to be many interesting moments too I am sure.

Tested on 19.40.1.1 firmware (latest public ATM)
We'll start with the ideal case. Car on AP, driving steadily when we encounter pedestrian firmly in our way.
We can see him from far away so we gracefully slow down, just like a real human! Perfect score! This happened 3 times out of 4.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!