Bloom Lab Profile picture
11 Sep, 12 tweets, 7 min read
In a new study (biorxiv.org/content/10.110…), we have completely mapped mutations to #SARSCoV2 that escape human antibodies, and shown that these "escape maps" predict how virus evolves under antibody pressure & inform design of escape-resistant antibody cocktails. (1/12)
Background: antibodies that target the #SARSCoV2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) are being developed as therapeutics & vaccines aim to elicit them. Among most potent RBD antibodies are set isolated by @VUMC_Vaccines, @seth_zost & Pavlo Gilchuk (nature.com/articles/s4158…) (2/12)
Key question is what mutations to #SARSCoV2 RBD escape antibody binding. Classic way to determine this is to grow virus w antibody & see what is selected. But this approach is incomplete: any given replicate stochastically selects at most 1 of possible escape mutations. (3/12)
Fortunately, Allie Greaney & @tylernstarr developed deep mutational scanning method to measure how all mutations to RBD affect ability to fold & bind receptor (cell.com/cell/fulltext/…). Here they extended method to *completely* map mutations that escape antibody binding. (4/12)
For each antibody, they get escape map like below. Tall letters indicate mutations that escape antibody. By inspection of map, we see for instance that antibodies 2499 & 2096 are escaped by some of the same mutations, but that 2499 & 2050 have orthogonal escape mutations. (5/12)
The paper has escape maps for 10 antibodies, and you can see interactive versions here (jbloomlab.github.io/SARS-CoV-2-RBD…). (6/12)
We can organize antibodies in space of escape mutations. Left plot divides RBD in regions & right plot arranges antibodies so ones w similar escape mutations are close, coloring by RBD region of escape. Antibodies that bind similar region not always close in escape space! (7/12)
Then it gets really cool. Leveraging spike-expressing VSV from @vsv512 & @paulrothlauf, Pavlo & @seth_zost performed 100s of escape selections with various antibodies. Some antibodies selected escape mutations, some didn't. Can we understand which mutations selected & why? (8/12)
Yes! Plot below shows all RBD mutations & how they affect antibody & ACE2 binding. Selected mutations consistently escape antibody w/o impairing ACE2 binding & accessible by single nt change. The antibody (2165) that isn't escaped? D420Y bad for RBD folding (see paper). (9/12)
So we can combine complete escape maps with deep mutational scanning measurements of how mutations affect RBD folding and function to understand which antibodies are easily escaped, and which mutations will escape them. (10/12)
Finally, we use complete escape maps to design cocktails of antibodies that resist escape despite binding same region of RBD. This is new paradigm in therapeutic antibody cocktails: if you know enough about escape, antibodies don't need to bind different regions. (11/12)
Lots of details can't fit in Tweets, so read paper if you have time.

Main credit to Allie Greaney, @tylernstarr, Pavlo Gilchuk, @seth_zost for this innovative work.

Also many others @fredhutch & @VUMC_Vaccines, e.g. @EladBinshtein @huddlej @khdcrawford @AdamDingens (12/12)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bloom Lab

Bloom Lab Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jbloom_lab

28 Aug
Lots of recent discussion about #SARSCoV2 re-infections, with 2 pre-prints describing possible examples. To contextualize these re-infections, I'd like to discuss the following papers, which document same-season re-infection with influenza, and re-infection with measles (1/6).
This paper (onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…) describes an otherwise healthy 9-year old who was infected twice in a 3-month span with H3N2 influenza, without any substantial antigenic change in the virus between the two infections (residue 67 in HA1 not major antigenic site). (2/6)
Although less extensively documented due to being from an earlier era, this paper (nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…) describes at least one case (the 16-year old) of a person who appears to have been re-infected with measles virus. (3/6)
Read 6 tweets
14 Aug
Excited to contribute to this extremely important #SARSCoV2 study by @GreningerLab that provides first direct evidence that neutralizing antibodies are a correlate of protection against #COVID19 in humans! (1/9)
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Perhaps *the* most important question in the #SARSCoV2 field right now is what immune responses protect against re-infection in humans. Knowing the answer to this question is critical for vaccine design and epidemiology. (2/9)
Lab studies show neutralizing antibodies are protective in animals, but there isn't comparable data in humans. To address this, large & expensive studies are currently being set up.

But @GreningerLab came up with a creative way to start answering this question right now! (3/9)
Read 9 tweets
8 Aug
Our new study led by @khdcrawford in collaboration with @HelenChuMD looks at the dynamics of neutralizing antibodies in the 3-4 months following recovery from infection with #SARSCoV2 (1/9): medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
To do this, @khdcrawford measured neutralizing antibody titers in longitudinal samples that @HelenChuMD's group had collected from 34 recovered individuals, whose infections ranged from asymptomatic to severe disease. (2/9)
This plot shows the dynamics for just one individual who is pretty typical: neutralizing antibody titers peak 3-4 weeks post-symptom onset, and then decline somewhat in the months following that. (See Fig 1A of pre-print for comparable data for all 34 individuals.) (3/9)
Read 9 tweets
18 Jun
We've experimentally measured how all amino-acid mutations to the #SARSCoV2 spike RBD affect ACE2 binding and expression of folded protein in a deep mutational scanning study led by @tylernstarr & Allie Greaney: biorxiv.org/content/10.110…

Why is this important? (1/n)
The RBD (receptor binding domain) enables #SARSCoV2 to bind to human cells. Evolution to bind human ACE2 was key to the emergence of this virus. Now it's also key to mitigating the virus: the most potent antibodies bind to RBD, and most vaccine candidates contain RBD. (2/n)
Before our study, the structure of the RBD protein was known but we didn't know how mutations affected it's function. Now we've measured how virtually all (3800 of 3819) amino-acid mutations affect binding to ACE2 and expression of the folded protein. (3/n)
Read 14 tweets
28 May
In a new study, we've measured how many children visiting a Seattle hospital have serological evidence of prior infection with #SARSCoV2: medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

Why is this important and what did we find? (1/14)
Children are under-represented in #COVID19 case counts. Are they less likely to be infected, or are their infections just overlooked because they often only get mildly sick? Serology identifies antibodies from infection independent of symptoms, so can help answer this. (2/14)
Our collaborator Jan Englund (@seattlechildren's hospital) collected 1,775 residual serum samples from 1,076 children in March & April during early Seattle outbreak. Samples from children seeking medical care for any reason: respiratory illness, surgery, routine care, etc. (3/14)
Read 14 tweets
21 Apr
We've written detailed protocol on neutralization assays for #SARSCoV2 at biosafety-level-2 using lentiviral pseudotype, and put key reagents (293T-ACE2 cells, plasmids) in BEI Resources repository. Most labs should be able to perform these assays (1/9).
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Why is this useful? Most serology assays (e.g. ELISA) measure antibodies that *bind* virus. But for many viruses, including coronaviruses (e.g., Table 3 of ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2991366), neutralizing antibodies correlate more w protection from disease than binding antibodies. (2/9)
So for purposes like convalescent sera transfer and studying immunity, neutralization assays probably more informative than binding assays. Unfortunately, neutralization assays harder to perform as they require using an infection-capable virus. (3/9)
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!