These are desperate times, but clinging to any strands of hope @BorisJohnson sets up so many outrageous straw men you could - just about - see it as creating the space for a deal 1/

telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/…
@BorisJohnson The hyperbolic "blockade" he mentions is driven the the fact that the Protocol (that he signed, I know) says that IF the two sides can't agree which goods are 'at risk' of going across the border into the Single Market then the default is that all of them are /2
@BorisJohnson This has arguable allowed the EU to be lazy - play hardball - since it can always fall back on the default.

The Internal Market Bill moves to close this avenue off - which in theory could change that negotiating dynamic, but in the process has just blown the negotiations up. /3
@BorisJohnson Nonetheless IF the Joint Committee did agree an acceptable slim 'at risk' register then @BorisJohnson could claim victory. Huzzah my friends, we have lifted the blockade! So feed the seige mentality and then take the credit for saving the citizenry. /4
@BorisJohnson Which is to say, the actual practical handling issues border issues in the NIP - the level of 'at risk goods', the exit summary decs NI-GB - are resolvable in the Joint Committee. But to do that Mr Johnson needs to take his gun off the table. Until then, hard to see EU talking/5
@BorisJohnson The other problem - which Mr Johnson conspicuously doesn't mention - is the State Aid portion of the Irish Protocol (which he signed, I know) which is also a huge problem because of its 'reach back' into the UK state aid decisions. /6
@BorisJohnson That means that even after Brexit, with a Canada-style FTA in your pocked, the EU would still have 'reach' over state aid decisions on GB matters because of their indirect impact over Northern Ireland. You can see that's tricky, but again, that was the deal /7
@BorisJohnson And as I reported this morning in @FT the implications were very clearly spelled out. The document I have notes the "ministerial mandate dating from the renegotations" to limit reach-back on State Aid. They knew perfectly well what the deal was /8

ft.com/content/de1af5…
@BorisJohnson @FT Again, this COULD be addressed if the European Commission gave explicit guidance perhaps on the way it would interpret Art 10 - but again, in this poisoned atmosphere, the Mr Johnson sitting there with his legislative revolver locked and loaded? Mmmm./9
@BorisJohnson @FT Which brings us to the other part - the EU-UK FTA - because that is of course hugely important to unlocking the Protocol management. A zero tariff, zero quota deal makes the whole thing a lot easier - but to do that the UK needs to do a deal on level playing field/State aid /10
@BorisJohnson @FT Which is where things get ugly, because the Protcol Mr Johnson signed was in a Withdrawal Agreement in tandem with a Political Declaration that promised a deep and comprehensive trade partnership with LPF guarantees - an ambition Mr Johnson has now junked. /11
@BorisJohnson @FT The result is that the Protocol Mr Johnson signed would risk partially neutering the very freedoms on state subsidies that his 'barebones' deals aspires to deliver (for reasons never really explained other than some vague stuff about UK tech start ups).../12
@BorisJohnson @FT Rocks and hard places, but we when Mr Johnson say he "cannot leave the theoretical power to carve up our country – to divide it – in the hands of an international organisation" the absurdity is that that is exactly what HE DID! /13
@BorisJohnson @FT Indeed so silly is this piece that - and at risk of clutching at straws - you could just read it as a way of repolishing the turd.

If a deal can be done (and it still can, in theory, poisoned politics aside) then Mr Johnson will have successfully knocked down his straw men/14
@BorisJohnson @FT My worry is that the Internal Market Bill is drafted in a way that doesn't speak to this being a tactical ploy. And we await to see the Finance Bill that will cover tariffs.

In any event, it's a very long way back down the hill now, for both sides. Good weekend. ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Foster

Peter Foster Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pmdfoster

10 Sep
As #Brexit trade negs head for rocks, the focus on the 'Internal Market Bill was all on the 'notwithstanding' clauses - but the bill's REAL bombs were also on the devolution settlements - See here @FF explainer with me, @MureDickie @PickardJE 1/

ft.com/content/a150b0…
@ff @MureDickie @PickardJE And if we are heading inexorably for a 'no deal' exit in January, then the political context for UK is even more important ahead of Scottish parliament elections next May /2
@ff @MureDickie @PickardJE To recap, leaving the EU means that the UK 'internal market' is not longer undergirded by EU rules/directives/law.... that power is transferred to Westminster...and that means friction. Just as Brexiters hate Brussels, so Scottish/Welsn nationalists will chafe at W'minster rule/3
Read 12 tweets
9 Sep
#Brexit things are getting ugly.

This @michaelgove statement about his call with @MarosSefcovic basically amounts, in EU eyes, to: "that’s a nice treaty you have here. Shame if anything happened to it” /1
@michaelgove @MarosSefcovic The British Government reiterates its "commitment" to the Irish Protocol in one breath, while legislating to re-write it in the other - IF it doesn't get the outcome it wants in the Joint Committee negotiation. /2
@michaelgove @MarosSefcovic Mr Gove "hoped Joint Committee discussions would reach a satisfactory conclusion"...

Given move in UK Internal Market Bill, how can that sound anything other than a threat.

Understand call with Sefcovic was "very tense". I bet. /3
Read 7 tweets
9 Sep
Good Morning. It's #Brexit "break the law day" today.

So question (1): what does it mean? Is it serious?

And question (2) for the EU: "waddaya gonna do abaat it? Punk." 1/Thread
So in answer to Q1, it IS serious.

Serious enough for the UK's top government lawyer to resign in principle over the government plans. As me and @SebastianEPayne report here. But why SO serious? /2

ft.com/content/6d7594…
@SebastianEPayne Because this is NOT "tidying up loose ends", its a flagrant move to unilaterally define a *mutually agreed* treaty (the Northern Ireland Protocol) in the event of a 'no deal'.

Officials call it a "safety net" but then, if it's so benign ,why did Jonathan Jones quit? /3
Read 20 tweets
8 Sep
Just to take a step back for a moment. The Irish Protocol was designed to protect the all-Ireland economy and peace process after #brexit.

It was an "all weather" vehicle, designed to withstand precisely the storm of a 'no deal' - that's its point 1/thread
It was a very deliberately constructed insurance policy.

So the Government's apparent attempts to re-write it, pare it back is like an insurance company trying to wheedle out of a pre-agreed policy, as @GeorgePeretzQC has observed. /2
@GeorgePeretzQC That cannot BUT have impact on the trust levels between the parties when they come to sign a new insurance policy - this time in regards of the Level Playing Field needed as the basis for the EU giving the UK 'zero tariff, zero quota' access to the Single Market. /3
Read 17 tweets
6 Sep
NEW: 🚨🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺🚨🚨🚨UK planning legislation to override key parts of #brexit withdrawal treaty and Northern Ireland protocol - a potentially HUGE move in negotiations; major ructions in Whitehall - my latest via @FT
on.ft.com/2FeQyY4
@FT Per three sources with knowledge of plans the UK Internal Market bill (due on Weds) and this autumn's Finance Bill will contain clauses that “eliminate the legal force of parts of the withdrawal agreement”. The EU are unlikely to like this - which I guess is the point /2
@FT Given @MichelBarnier
insistence on the "precise implementation" of the Withdrawal Agreement, the decision to legislate in a way that dilutes those obligations - on State Aid, export summary declarations and tariffs - is not likely to go down well with the EU /3
Read 20 tweets
3 Sep
🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧🚛🚚🚄🚢☄️☄️🚨
Logistics & customs industries firing distress flares now over pace of #brexit border preps.

Demanding urgent high-level meeting with ⁦@michaelgove⁩ ⁦@RishiSunak⁩ ⁦@grantshapps⁩ via @FT 1/thread
on.ft.com/3hUw8C4
@michaelgove @RishiSunak @grantshapps @FT First the letter itself - short but sweet - and important to note that it comes from the experts. The groups that actually move stuff and do stuff. I am not an expert, I can only report their concerns - which they are clearly now escalating. /2
@michaelgove @RishiSunak @grantshapps @FT There are also other signatories to that letter - including some household name logistics companies - for which discretion is the better part of valour.

But they are deeply worried on three counts:
1) IT not being ready
2) Biz having no time to adjust
3) Govt not listening /3
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!