Most people on the planet want a vaccine right now and we got some news this week that the process is speeding along. Getting a vaccine approved (or authorized) quickly will be critical, but how fast is too fast? Let’s take a look.(1/20)
cnn.com/2020/09/13/hea…
Remember EUA - stands for Emergency Use Authorization - and permits the FDA to allow the use of unapproved drugs and products to manage a public health emergency. These terms are important. These products would be “authorized” but not yet “approved.”(2/20)
fda.gov/emergency-prep…
For this pandemic - hundreds of EUAs have been issued for diagnostic tests but just two are currently being used for therapeutics - the antiviral remdesivir and convalescent plasma - donated antibodies from Covid-19 survivors. (3/20)
An EUA for hydroxychloroquine was issued in March. But as larger studies were conducted, no benefit was found & there was evidence it could cause harm. The FDA revoked the EUA on 6/15. (4/20)
fda.gov/media/138945/d…
The EUA standard for a vaccine has to be especially high. Why? It’s given to healthy people to prevent illness, as opposed to sick people with no alternatives. And, with vaccines, there is an alternative - masks and physically distancing, which are proven to work. (5/20)
I believe strongly in vaccines and what they can do for public health. But we need to trust that these vaccines are safe and effective and undergo the proper scientific and regulatory oversight. And that takes time to get it right. (6/20)
In Phase 3, ~ 30K ppl are randomized into vaccinated and placebo groups. The hope is to see an “efficacy signal,” -- the placebo group becoming infected at a faster rate than the vaccinated group. Keep in mind: The current US infection rate is around 1/10K people per day (7/20)
Moncef Slaoui, chief advisor to Operation Warp Speed, told me the sort of “efficacy signal” they would like: ~110 infections in the placebo group, and no more than ~50 infections in vaccinated group. Doing the math, that means the signal would take around 4 months to occur (8/20)
Another reason to go slow: safety Moncef Slaoui also told me most adverse effects occur within 42 days of vaccination, so the phase 3 trials won’t likely be considered complete until both shots have been given and then volunteers are monitored for that time. (9/20)
The goal is to avoid a catastrophe like the vaccination effort of 1976. Back then, a new strain of swine flu was found. Worried that it might be repeat of 1918, a vaccination program was quickly started. (10/20) wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/12…
But by December 1976, fewer than 40 million people had been vaccinated and no outbreak ever occurred. There were, however, more than 50 cases of a neurological disorder called Guillain-Barre syndrome. (11/20)
cnn.com/2020/04/24/hea…
While there’s never been a definitive link between Guillain-Barre and that vaccination, the CDC did find 1 case of Gullain-Barre for every 100,000 people who received the swine flu vaccine and ended the vaccine program. (12/20)
A New York Times op-ed called it “The Swine Flu Fiasco” and said that “Washington’s energies” had sickened many because of their inability to put “biological reality before political expediency.” (13/20)
timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1…
In 2017, a campaign to vaccinate nearly a million kids from the mosquito-borne disease Dengue in the Philippines ended after 10 children died. Officials had been warned that the vaccine should only be used in people who had already been infected. (14/20)
Why? Because Dengue is actually caused by four different viruses and in this case, vaccinating people who had never been infected, raises the risk of complications if they are then infected by a different strain. (15/20)
cnn.com/2017/12/04/hea…
When the public perceives politics is before science, it breaks down public trust. And that trust is as important as the scientific evidence. You need both to achieve vaccine effectiveness. (16/20)
There are some lessons from past pandemics. During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, a poll revealed just under 9% of people said they would be willing to get an unapproved (only authorized) vaccine. (17/20)
In that same poll, they found if a simple fact sheet was provided - 57% of people would get it. If given directly and explained by their own doctor, willingness to use a vaccine under EUA jumped to 68% (18/20)
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
A recent Kaiser poll found that 62% of Americans are worried that political pressure will cause the FDA to rush approval of a vaccine. (19/20)
We can achieve “community immunity” once most of us are vaccinated -- but we can only do that if we can trust that we have a safe, effective and trusted vaccine. In the meantime, the alternative can still keep us safe - a few more months of masks and distancing. (20/20)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Sanjay Gupta

Dr. Sanjay Gupta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drsanjaygupta

25 Aug
I spoke to FDA head @SteveFDA about the decision to issue an EUA (emergency use authorization) for convalescent plasma to treat those currently infected. While promising, it’s been controversial because many say the data is inadequate. (1/11)
cnn.com/2020/08/23/hea…
Dr. Hahn told me “he should have better explained the data.” Here’s what he (incorrectly) said on Sunday night: Use of convalescent plasma reduced the risk of death by 35% and that meant if 100 people got coronavirus, 35 would survive. (2/11)
whitehouse.gov/briefings-stat…
Last night he aimed to clarify that by telling me and then tweeting: “What I should have said better is that the data show a relative risk reduction not an absolute risk reduction.” This is a fundamental difference and important to understand. (3/11)
Read 11 tweets
16 Aug
One of the questions I am getting more than any other: Am I going to send my children back to school? My three teen/pre-teen girls want to go back to school and miss their friends like many others. But there is a lot to consider when making this decision. (1/20) Image
At least 63 of 101 of the largest school districts in the country have decided to start the year with virtual learning, but our school is offering both in-person and virtual options, which leaves the decision to us. (2/20)
On one hand, our school has taken major steps to follow the CDC recommendations and is even offering testing for students. I personally visited the school to understand every safety precaution. But, all of this only works if students are diligent. (3/20)
cnn.it/2CqKWbS
Read 20 tweets
15 Aug
CNN has confirmed that the United States government is considering a challenge trial as a failsafe or “Plan D” as Dr. Anthony Fauci told me - So what is a challenge trial? 1/16
It is a controversial approach in which healthy people are vaccinated and then intentionally exposed to the virus. The rationale for a challenge trial would be to assess the effectiveness of a vaccine more quickly. 2/16 Image
The typical approach is to introduce a vaccine trial in an area of the world where virus is circulating rapidly. You need tens of thousands of people enrolled in that part of the trial, known as phase 3. 3/16
Read 16 tweets
20 Jul
As a parent and a doctor - I never thought the question of sending my kids to school would become politicized. (1/9)
But as schools decide whether or not to let students and teachers return to school - I wanted to know what science says about the role of kids in transmission. (2/9)
cnn.it/2CqKWbS
While there are some severe outcomes, most children appear to have milder symptoms when they get infected. But one study by virologist @c_drosten found that kids have just as much virus as adults – making them potentially just as infectious. (3/9)
Read 9 tweets
18 Apr
We know the people most at risk from Covid-19 are older adults and those with underlying health conditions. But scientists are also wondering why some healthy young people have also passed away. (1/10)
There will always be outliers, sure, but could there be something happening biologically that makes some people more susceptible to the virus? (2/10)
Dr. Anthony Fauci told me "I'm fascinated ... by what I would call the pathogenesis" when I interviewed him for my podcast, "Coronavirus: Fact vs. Fiction." (3/10)
cnn.it/3alAc9R
Read 10 tweets
10 Apr
We've heard a lot about coronavirus testing over the past few months. We've heard about shortages of tests. Faulty test kits. And people denied testing because they weren't sick enough. But how do coronavirus tests even work? It's complicated. (1/23)
In order to fight a pandemic, you have to know who's infected. That enables you isolate those who are sick, and quarantine those who might be. But the novel coronavirus is just that: novel. We didn’t have a test for it at first — so researchers had to make a new one. (2/23)
After the coronavirus was detected in China, officials shared the viral genome – essentially, the genetic blueprint for the virus. That was important, because it let researchers around the world design tests that looked for snippets of that genetic material. (3/23)
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!