🧵

People in their 20s are now disproportionately represented in new COVID-19 cases in Ontario.

Instead of shaming & blaming, I asked them what challenges they’re currently facing with respect to the pandemic.

After 100s of replies, some key themes emerged. Here they are:
Many people in their 20s mentioned peer and social pressure, plus general difficulty navigating behaviours of those around them as a major challenge during the pandemic.
Difficulty seeing or isolating from family was cited as a key challenge folks in their 20s are facing.

This one is big given data from France suggesting cases in young people eventually spread to older folks in 3-5 weeks.
Unsurprisingly, school was another major challenge people in their 20s are facing that’s forcing them to be non-compliant to general safety guidelines.

This applies to those who are students and teachers.
Many people in their 20s live in shared housing, meaning it’s hard to maintain a bubble or truly limit their close contacts.
Loneliness & mental health was another major challenge folks in their 20s are facing during the pandemic.

Contrary to popular belief that 20-somethings are reckless, quite a few replies they’ve had next to no physical contact the last 6 months, which is quite worrisome tbh.
Money and the need to work is a key driver in any demographic, but the people in their 20s I asked self-report added challenges of unsafe and unregulated workplaces with little job security.
Some less frequent but still important mentions for challenges faced by people in their 20s: dating, fatigue & frustration, confusion on public health guidelines, and transportation.
This wasn’t a scientific survey, but I hope these anecdotes help ppl rethink their assumptions about COVID spread amongst 20-somethings.

And importantly, to redirect our rage where it belongs: at government & public health officials making contradictory & confusing guidelines.
Also sorry the graphics are 🥔 quality. Believe it or not they took me 2 hours because Instagram limits how you can share replies so I had to save multiple copies of the same jpeg over and over. But hopefully you get the gist!
PS. If you do actual research on this topic, please DM me!

A lot of journalists are now reaching out and I'd love to connect them with people doing real studies on this!
👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 here’s the thread on this topic I didn’t write at 2am 😅

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🔬Samantha Yammine, PhD (aka Science Sam)

🔬Samantha Yammine, PhD (aka Science Sam) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @heysciencesam

16 May
A quick visual guide to risk assessment, based off some of the fantastic research summaries created by @mugecevik @firefoxx66 and @ErinBromage

1/13 Graphic saying covid-19 exposure risk = viral dose x time
Your exposure risk is some function of viral dose & time.

The tricky thing is we don’t know how many virus particles it takes to cause an infection, and this will likely vary from person to person.

The good news is we know some ways to reduce our relative risks

2/13 Graphic saying We don’t yet know how many virus particles it takes to cause an infection, but we do know how to reduce the chances of virus particles getting near our eyes nose and mouth. Yes physical distancing and hand hygiene, but wait there’s more!
Time is perhaps an under-appreciated component of the risk equation.

Slow & steady can “win the race” to an infection too.

3/13 Time complicates things. Even exposure to a low viral dose for a long time can become risky. The more we understand the risks in our environments, the better we can get at navigating them - for the sake of everyone!
Read 14 tweets
20 Mar
PSA TO MEDIA:

“AEROSOLS” is jargon - IT IS YOUR JOB TO CLEARLY STATE HOW THEY DIFFER FROM DROPLETS WHEN SHARING RESULTS FROM THE NEJM PAPER.
In a nutshell: COVID-19 patients likely cough/sneeze DROPLETS, which are larger than aerosols and all fall to the floor within 1-2m, give or take.

AEROSOLS are smaller so can last in air for longer, but are very likely only produced in hospitals after certain medical procedures
THE TAKEAWAY: this paper does NOT mean SARS-CoV2 is floating around in the air for 3 hrs - it does NOT seem to be airborne like that (the R value would be much higher if it were).

Healthcare workers DO have to deal with aerosols so save the masks for them.
Read 6 tweets
3 Mar
YES, hand sanitizer DOES kill many viruses, not just bacteria. Here's how.

#FactsNotFear #COVID19
To clarify the line about water (I struggled to multi-task😅): a mixture of water & alcohol is better than 100% alcohol for many reasons - the water keeps hands from drying out too much, helps with penetration, and even slows down evaporation of the alcohol so it has time to work
But it’s the mixture of alcohol in your hand sanitizer that helps to dissolve away the molecules that make up the cell membrane of bacteria or outer coat of a virus.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!