Fascinating piece on legal grounds to stop Nord Stream 2 by Konrad Schuller (who doesn’t seen to be on Twitter) in @faznet —> in German, so for all you poor souls who don’t speak my mother tongue, here’s a thread to summarize 1/n
Background: there’s a growing movement in Berlin arguing for cancellation of Nord Stream 2 (details in my Sept. 10 FT column brookings.edu/blog/order-fro…)
Now the Green co-party leader @ABaerbock and Green MEP @bueti have laid out the legal argument:
1/2
1. GE government should declare that the pipeline threatens European security. Why?
1/3
— NS2 is a Swiss company owned 100% by Gazprom, the RU state energy monopolist
— NS2 profits feed the RU state’s aggression abroad (Libya, Syria, Ukraine) ...
1/4
... as well as the system of domestic security services (FSB, SVR) and mil. chemical weapons labs which —according to GE govt — are the source of the new and particularly lethal strain of #Novichok used to poison #Navalny
- > details here: zeit.de/2020/38/deutsc…
1/5
@ABaerbock told @faznet: GE government needs to recognize that
— #NordStream2 “splits Europe, endangers its security, & undermines its energy sovereignty”
— legal basis would be Art. 215 of the EU Treaty, see eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex… which allows the Council to enact sanctions
1/6
— Another possible legal basis, addording to dep. PL FM Jablonski, is the EU sanctions regime against chem weapons enacted 10-15-2018 after the #Skripal attacks
— according to @SchullerKonrad, EU bureaucracy is discussing this option
@SchullerKonrad quotes @bueti as pointing out that #NordStream2 has not yet been certified by the Federal Network Agency (GE national network regulator):
— condition of certification is “the energy security of all EU member states”
— so certification should be denied
1/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lessons from Ukraine: on the anniversary weekend of #Russia’s full-scale invasion of its peaceful neighbor, 17 @BrookingsFP scholars explain what we have learned, and what needs to be done now — a thread 🧵👇 brookings.edu/essay/lessons-…
Fiona Hill observes that restoring European security and deterrence will require the United States and its allies to persuade skeptical middle powers that a world order that is safe for all nations can only be based on international law and the United Nations Charter. 1/15
@steven_pifer addresses the thorny question of how Ukraine can best protect itself against future Russian aggression; he argues that the West’s red lines — NATO boots on the ground & membership for Ukraine — mean that Kyiv must be given all the arms it needs to defend itself.2/15
„,Wir wollten es nicht sehen.’ Die Fraktionsführungen von CDU und CSU haben keinen Grund, mit einer selbstkritischen Reflexion noch länger zu warten—auch als Grundlage für eine neue Ost- und Russlandpolitik.”
Eine Abrechnung von Hans-Joachim Falenski👇 zeitung.faz.net/faz/politik/20…
Hans-Joachim Falenski war von 1983 bis 2021 außenpolitischer Berater der CDU/CSU-Bundestagsfraktion. Mit anderen Worten: wer soll die Russlandpolitik der Union besser beurteilen können? Genau.
Falenski zählt auf, was bei Putin so hätte auffallen können:
— ab den 90ern Zus.arbeit mit der OK in St.Petersburg
— mit Amtsantritt 2000 Aufbau eines Neo-KGB-Staats
— 2005 Beginn schwerer innenpol. Repressionen
— 2006: Gas als pol. Waffe
— 2009 Unterbindung Gastransit durch UKR
Go to the Museum of Science and Industry, I was told. It has a submarine.
Ok. Submarines are cool.
What I didn’t realize until I got there is that it is a German submarine.
A NAZI SUBMARINE.
IN CHICAGO.
IN A MUSEUM BASEMENT.
I give you: U-505/1
By way of a narrative slowdown, this is how the enlisted men aboard U-505 hotbunked:
Above a live torpedo. As one does.
(Not live now, no worries.)/2
U-505 had destroyed eight Allied vessels in three years. It also had an Enigma coding machine on board. It was pursued by the US hunter-killer group 22.3, under Captain Dan Gallery on the USS Guadalcanal. U-505 was captured off West Africa on June 4, 1944./3