from 1999 to 2108 its revenues went up ~ 275x a cagr of ~ 32%
it turned profit making & ended 2018 with almost $400mn profit
It was acquired by IBM in end 2018 for$34 bn
While company's biz grew at an amazing pace over years, the experience of shareholders was vastly different. Worst off were those who bought during 1st few months frenzy & held on - egged on by 'experts' confirming a 'new normal' :)
These folk took 12-18 yrs to break even !!
IPO boom of 1999 & subsequent bust was real. I See parallels in 2020. Many gr8 businesses r IPOing in US. eg #Snowflake. But frenzy causing absurd valuations. Fortunes may b made in short term. But if u don't get out in time & fall 4 'new normal' narratives - u will b minced meat
Some will give eg of Amazon: which even if bought at peak of '99 & held on, would've been a multi bagger
But remember: even Amazon crashed like mad in dot com bust
Patiently wait out a better price 2 buy gr8 cos that r currently at absurd valuations due to frenzy
That's it :)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) sale of stake held by co in Mindtree to LnT for ~ 2700 cr. This was actually done when VGS was still alive. just months b4 his unfortunate death
2) sale of real estate asset global village tech park to blackstone for approx EV 2000 - 2500 cr
3) CDE lost controlling stake in its subsidiary Sical Logistics as lenders invoked collateral shares. SCL had debt of 1500 cr which used 2 add 2 CDE consolidated debt
But no control = SL no longer subsidiary = it's debt can't show in consol debt of CDE. Just an accounting thing
I can't tell you how important it is to calculate your PMS/ RIA / AIF annual performance on post tax basis. Use this no to compare against benchmark
Benchmarked performance shown by PMS/AIFs/RIAs (including on SmallCase) is usually post fees & costs but NOT post taxes
The reason most don't talk about post tax performance is that for each client the tax implications will be different. hence it's messy. Fair enough
Therefore as a client it's for you to go back & c what the performance was post tax
Usually an index is used as benchmark to compare performance. Remember, when any PMS/AIF/RIA uses an index as benchmark, they are in some ways comparing how their active investing worked against just buy & hold index strategy
A thread on some observations from #Nazaratechnologies DRHP - largely to do with revenue analysis. The IPO notes of i-bankers aren't delving on these points. Since I noticed them, I am putting them out here.
(not an opinion or recco wrt to IPO)
Reported consolidated revenues:
Sep 2020 (6m) = 200 cr (~annualised 400 cr)
Mar 2020 (12m) = 248 cr
Mar 2019 (12m) = 170 cr
Mar 2018 (12 m) = 172 cr
Interesting insight into the 200 cr rev for 6 months ended Sep '20:
1) 79/200 cr is from segment 'gamified early learning'. This entire 79 cr is attributable to subsidiary, paper boat apps: makers of Kiddopia. Nazara owns 51% - acquired in '20. Entire 79 cr rev is from N America
Competition would like Vodaidea gone. But Vodaidea has bought itself a couple of yrs of survival from AGR verdict as they will be able to raise enough funds to last a couple of years by convincing board that 'as ARPU's rise things will get better'
To kill Vodaidea competition needs to keep ARPUs low for 2 more years. But competition itself doesn't make enough money at these ARPUs. So will they want to self inflict pain for 2 more yrs?