The fact of the matter is this: it is incredibly expensive for insurance companies to pay for pre-existing conditions. It’s much cheaper to let you die. ACA *remarkably* made that illegal, against all odds.
For people who have been critiquing the ACA for the past eight years for not going far enough....try getting that back after we lose it.
The ACA also remarkably closed health insurance inequities
Which before the ACA - were literally deadly for black and brown populations
Again, for everyone who has been not standing by the ACA for the past eight years for not going far enough, try getting that part back when we lose it
The ACA particularly protected middle and low income populations in blue states - which are about to get decimated because large segments of the population will lose health insurance
Again, try getting that back when we lose it
The ACA also lowered prescription drug costs and protected against medical bankruptcies. Now - there will literally be no one negotiating on your behalf
For everyone who did not stand by the ACA, now it’s your turn to tell us how we get that back when we lose it
Too many ppl on all sides - have been willing to let the ACA fail rather than building on these essential and existential protections.
So now the trick is, what’s your plan? I personally would suggest fighting tooth and nail to save the ACA
Because what comes next —— will make it highly cost effective and LEGAL To not cover you when you get sick or help you pay for your medications
And if you think that’s going to be enough to get everyone to rally to the side of demanding healthcare...well, i’ve got a book I think you might want to read
Before #ACA#SCOTUS, uninsurance rates were 33% for Latinx, 32% for Native Americans, 20% for Black Americans. A remarkable 46.5 million people lacked basic health care coverage – nearly 18% of the entire nonelderly population of the country @USNewsHealthusnews.com/news/healthies…
Meanwhile *we are in a pandemic**. Florida reported 2,521 new #COVID cases on Sunday, according to the Florida Department of Health. Since the pandemic began, 13,296 Florida residents have died from the virus cnn.com/world/live-new…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today is launch day for WHAT WE’VE BECOME: LIVING AND DYING IN A COUNTRY OF ARMS.
The book begins in the early morning hours of April 22 2018, when a naked white man with an AR-15 burst into a Nashville Waffle House and shot and killed four young adults of color. I spent five years learning everything about the case – reading police reports, interviewing families, going to court hearings, studying how a man with a highly lethal gun ended up at a Waffle House, and what happened after he left.
My research changed much of what I thought I knew about #gunviolence in #America and the best ways to prevent it. #WhatWeBecome started as a book about #guns – and evolved into a terrifying, infuriating, and
exceedingly unexpected story about race, politics, and sanity in the US South.
Mass shootings happen so frequently in the US that we’ve tragically normalized them - even the worst shootings stay in the news for just a few days.
But looking in depth at a single event, led me to a startling realization: while experts like me have built a knowledge base around the horrific mortal effects of firing guns, we have done not nearly enough research into the meanings of guns never fired, or the social and political meanings of owning guns and carrying them. That blind spot has profound implications on many levels – from the inability to define and defend the American public square, to difficulties stopping once unimaginable expansions in gun sales, to the problems health-based arguments counter in refuting even the most extreme public carry laws.
My reading of the Waffle House tragedy ultimately leads me to the conclusion that guns represent more than health problems: they are problems of race, of history, of plurality. They are precursors to authoritarianism. Yet the prevention frameworks through which Democrats and liberals often understand guns can block recognition of these larger issues—with huge implications for the 2024 election and beyond. And that it’s time to change course – by broadening our alliances, supporting what I call gun-safety entrepreneurialism, and following the lead of activists and researchers who join gun safety with investments in lived environment.
I’m so looking forward to talking about these ideas in different locales across the country. More dets about the tour (so far!) appear at, , including stops at @nyu_ipk (with @ahylton26), @HarvardBooks, @PoliticsProse , and many others... jonathanmetzl.com/events
Dont think ppl have fully grasped implications of horrible #SCOTUS#gun decision. "As of today, in order to be constitutional, any such law must have a specific historical precedent from the 18th or early-19th century." Ie the end of modern gun control.
As @voxdotcom@imillhiser puts it: “The future of gun control in the United States could be quite grim—and Bruen could mark the moment when lawmakers’ power to fight gun violence falls apart.” vox.com/2021/4/26/2236…
#SCOTUS undercut a central tenet of the anti-gun-violence movement—namely that people who live in towns, cities, and states should have the right to set laws and policies that work best for them. bostonreview.net/articles/the-s…
Loosening gun policies in Missouri went hand-in-hand with the loss of over ten thousand and five hundred years of productive male life in the state between 2008 and 2015....
Between 2008-2015, a person in Missouri was 11x more likely to die by gun suicide than in an accidental house fire, and 14.5x more likely to die by gun suicide than by “natural/environmental” causes ranging from...
...death by flood, earthquake, tornado, falling from a ladder, electrocution, smoke inhalation, or after being bitten by a dog.....
For anyone wondering why Trump would even consider holding a WH balcony serenade while he remains infected and infectious...the #DyingOfWhiteness reason would be, yet again, that he drives and is driven by the politics of racial resentment.....
By this logic, signaling his devotion to a hierarchy that keeps white people on top is more important then what might seem from the outside like self interest or communal well-being....
So while many wonder why Trump can hold another WH rally even when he has/embodies Covid-it’s sending a very particular message about whiteness and white America that he assumes a more powerful message for his supporters than what might seem from the outside like self interest...
Core Trump base no more likely to start wearing masks than they are to support healthcare reform, saving the planet, gun safety, etc. Rather, getting #COVID19 now takes on new political meaning--becomes an expression of self-sacrifice and a way of showing devotion to the cause.
To put it another way, getting and transmitting #COVID19 is the 'logical' next phase of not wearing masks. Public health becomes politicized and weaponized for the cause.
Getting and transmitting #COVID19 then becomes a way of being like Trump, showing resistance, devotion, sacrifice.
We need a leader who will flip the switch on divisive rhetoric, and who sees our diversity as our superpower @MarkRuffalo#WithBidenWeCan
I grew up in Missouri. I’ve seen neighbors and communities work together in common cause! It’s preposterous to think we can’t do so again when faced with these monumental challenges
Fight back against a system that sees our differences as political opportunities