Saurabh Zalpuri Profile picture
Sep 23, 2020 16 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Have we misjudged the role of children in spreading #COVID19?
COVID19 research in to kid, especially younger ones, is not perfect. It has gaps, it is evolving and we are learning more by the day.
A short summary of evolving role of children 👇
cmaj.ca/content/192/38…
Statement from Ontario’s science advisory table:

- Kids may play a bigger role in the spread of #SARSCoV2 than initially suspected.

- Early suggestions that children are considerably less important drivers of transmission are not confirmed by more recent research.
Children less susceptible?
1. Contact tracing studies reported that children<10 years old are less likely to test positive.

Limitations: Studies underestimate infection rate in children if infected children are more likely to be asymptomatic than infected adults.
Children less likely to have #SARSCoV2 antibodies?

1. Seroprevalence studies found young children less likely to have antibodies.

Limitations: Studies mostly conducted when schools were closed, therefore children were likely to have fewer social contacts.
Potential lower susceptibility of younger children:
- Due to lower density of ACE2, receptor used by virus to infect cells.
Limitation: If children have more social contacts/react differently to interventions, this could offset potential biological advantage offered by low ACE2.
References:
Contact tracing studies- doi.org/10.1126/scienc…
doi.org/10.3201/eid261…
Seroprevalence studies-
doi.org/10.1016/S0140-…
doi.org/10.1016/S0140-…
Biological advantage/ACE2 studies-
doi.org/10.1038/s41591…
doi.org/10.1371/journa…
Have we underestimated the role of children?

Viral RNA studies showed RNA levels in swabs from children and adolescents with #COVID19 were similar to those in adults with COVID-19, and infectious SARS-CoV-2 was detected in children of all ages.
Viral outbreak evidence:
An outbreak study in attendees of a youth
camp found younger children were as likely as older attendees to be infected with SARS-CoV-2. This suggests that young children can have attack rates
similar to those of older children, adolescents and adults.
Interpretation (1/2):

- Children could play a relevant role in transmission; school closures may have been important contributors to the containment of pandemic.

- Public health interventions could be as relevant and impactful to control transmission in children as in adults.
Interpretation (2/2)

- It appears important to include children as part of any surveillance, testing and control strategy, while bearing in
mind that children are more likely than adults to remain asymptomatic after SARSCoV-2 infection.
Statement on opening schools (1/2):

- Some European countries (#Denmark) have demonstrated that reopening schools can be safe, “provided that local transmission is low and appropriate measures are in place,” such as reduced class sizes and well-ventilated classrooms.
Statement on opening schools (2/2):

- Reopening without such measures “could be associated with a higher number of school outbreaks,” as seen in Israel.

- "Important thing is not to panic but take it seriously,”
“There will be outbreaks in schools, so the more we keep class bubbles relatively small and isolated from each other, the better we will be able to shut down individual classes instead of having to close entire schools.”
Quick overview from the report:
Finally:
Most of these studies have caveats, gaps and blind spots. Associating presented in these studies cannot be inferred as causality.

But:
It does point towards a trend and an evolving understanding of role of children in transmission.

covid19-sciencetable.ca/wp-content/upl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Saurabh Zalpuri

Saurabh Zalpuri Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @phenomstruck

Nov 18, 2021
RIVM preprint 👇
The estimated disease burden of acute COVID-19 in the Netherlands in 2020, in disability-adjusted life-years.
(under peer-review, below are some highlights)
#epitwitter #covid19nl #rivm
assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-10267…
Study objectives were to quantify the total disease burden of acute COVID-19 in the Netherlands in 2020 using the disability-adjusted life-years (DALY) measure, and to investigate how disease burden varies between age-groups and occupation categories.
Authors estimated:
- total years of life lost (YLL),
- years lived with disability (YLD),
- disability adjusted life years (DALY) due to COVID-19.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 29, 2021
thelancet.com/journals/lance…
SARS-CoV-2 elimination, not mitigation, creates best outcomes for health, the economy, and civil liberties.
Public health, economic growth, democratic solidarity, and civil liberties are important factors when evaluating pandemic responses. There is mounting evidence that these objectives do not need to be in conflict in the COVID-19 response.
Countries that consistently aim for elimination—ie, maximum action to control SARS-CoV-2 and stop community transmission —have fared better than countries that opt for mitigation. (ie, action increased in a stepwise way to reduce cases so as not to overwhelm health-care systems)
Read 7 tweets
Oct 15, 2020
Scientific consensus on the #COVID19 pandemic: we need to act now.
One look at the authors list, and you'll see thought leaders in their fields; working diligently and with scientific evidence to make a difference.
"Just facts" in here, nothing else.
thelancet.com/lancet/article…
The #herdimmunity approach is a dangerous fallacy unsupported by the scientific evidence
The Barrington Declaration for focussed protection towards herd immunity has no basis in science and evidence. Full stop. It is a misguided self-aggrandising document, similar to the one circulating with patient zero at the White House.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 12, 2020
Het had niet zo ver hoeven komen – en het kan zo niet verder.
A point which a lot of us have been hammering (pun intended) in for months now.

nrc.nl/nieuws/2020/10…
We have technical resources, we have scientific expertise, we have diversity in our experiences- @rivm and #OMT should consider using all the help they can.
@C19RedTeam has offered their cross-functional expertise. A pandemic isn't just a medical issue, it is a societal issue.
Rather than rejecting any/all collaboration, @rivm and #OMT (for all their excellence) need to be inclusive, swallow their pride and open up.
All the evidence that they have made their recommendations on, needs to be in public domain.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 16, 2020
@IHME_UW (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation) and @UWMedicine (University of Washington’s School of Medicine), no lightweights, have come out with
global projections of #COVID19 by nation.
Short summary 👇

healthdata.org/news-release/f…
They modelled 3 scenarios:
1. Worse case:
- mask usage stays at current rates, and,
- governments continue relaxing social distancing requirements.
This leads to 4.0 million total deaths by the end of the year.
Best case:
- mask usage is near-universal, and,
- governments impose social distancing requirements when their daily death rate exceeds 8 per million.
This leads to 2.0 million total deaths if by the end of the year.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 27, 2020
Huge respect for Aura but some of her responses are contentious. I thank her for the work that she and her team are doing in this ever developing #covid19 pandemic. But one didn't need to understand #coronavirus to implement certain rules.
volkskrant.nl/ts-b73f5cef
Question: Maar anderzijds had u ook best kunnen adviseren: bescherm jezelf nou maar, voor de zekerheid.

Aura: Zeker. Maar dat is met de kennis van nu. Wat we in maart, april dachten te weten over het virus is achterhaald door de snelheid waarmee het zich bleek te verspreiden.
Has any of the field epidemiologists been involved in the decision making, they would have insisted on PPE/masks in healthcare/nursing homes.

Crisis management experts would have insisted it is better safe than sorry.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(