THREAD: Ahead of @realDonaldTrump speech on #healthcare, it's worth looking at how @JoeBiden's plan likely will undermine the existing system of employer health coverage.
Regarding employer coverage, @JoeBiden's health plan contains two key features. First, it would allow individuals who have an offer of employer coverage to go to the Exchanges and receive subsidies -- right now, they can't do that in most cases... 2/ joebiden.com/healthcare/#
Second, @JoeBiden wants to increase #Exchange subsidies. He would allow individuals with incomes over 400% of poverty (about $100K for a family of four) to qualify for them (they can't now). But he also wants to expand the existing subsidies for those under 400% of poverty... 3/
@JoeBiden has said he wants to reduce the share of income paid out-of-pocket by families in premiums, and increase deductible/co-payment assistance.
He specified exactly what the new subsidies would look like -- but his plan cites an @urbaninstitute paper with specifics... 4/
I used the @urbaninstitute specifications cited in @JoeBiden's health plan, and compared how people would fare compared to the existing averages for employer coverage, based on @AHRQNews' #MEPS data... 5/
As you can see from the chart, my analysis shows that virtually all individuals and families with incomes below 200% of poverty would have major financial incentives to switch to the #Exchanges under @JoeBiden plan... 6/
Some individuals and families with incomes between 200-300% of poverty would have major financial incentives to switch out of employer coverage as well, although those incentives would be less for many individuals, per the below... 7/
I found that, if 90% of households who would save at least $100/month by switching to the Exchange do so, and 50% who would save some money, but less than $100/month, switch coverage, a total of 24 million individuals will switch from employer coverage to the Exchanges... 8/
Some people might say that's a good thing -- families of modest means will benefit, so who's complaining?
Except there will be significant consequences for the rest of the system too. 9/
For one, covering these 24 million people will cost the federal government a total of $2.2 trillion in new Exchange subsidies, I estimate.
And this spending does NOTHING to lower the uninsured rate -- it's a straight cost-shift from the private sector to the government... 10/
For another, if people switch to subsidized Exchange plans, their employers could face higher taxes.
@JoeBiden hasn't said whether he would tax businesses whose workers switch to the Exchanges, but if he does, those would cost about $481 billion over ten years... 11/
Finally, I estimate about 64% of those who would switch coverage are under age 35. That means employers would be left with an older (read: sicker) pool of employees -- which may prompt them to drop coverage entirely... 12/
In other words, @JoeBiden's changes could hasten the collapse of employer coverage.
Not only is that promise one @JoeBiden can never keep, his policies would likely lead to employers dropping health coverage... 15/
The real object of @JoeBiden's health plan becomes apparent in the context of @KamalaHarris' infamous comments last year about banning private health insurance: "Let's eliminate all of that. Let's move on." 16/
Giving people big (and costly) incentives to switch to the #Exchanges and out of employer coverage is a major step towards eliminating private insurance. That's the ultimate outcome of @JoeBiden's health plan... 17/
Or you can read the report itself on my website here. Either way, it's an issue you'll be hearing a LOT more about should we end up with a @JoeBiden presidency... FIN juniperresearchgroup.com/post/5608/how-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: @JoeBiden attacked @GOP in #SOTU for wanting to 1) sunset Medicare/SS, 2) “cut” those programs, and hold the debt ceiling hostage to pass those “cuts.”
As we’ll see, those are all things BIDEN PROPOSED HIMSELF.
Follow/RT for additional details… 1/
Let’s start with sunsetting Medicare/SS. This is a topic @JoeBiden should be very familiar with—because he proposed it himself. In 1975, he sponsored a bill (S. 2067, 94th Congress) to sunset all federal programs every four years. 2/
Here’s the language of the bill, which revokes authorizations for all federal programs—including SS and Medicare—after four (not five) fiscal years. 3/
The issue involves two corporations, CelticCapri Corp. and Giacoppa Corp., through which @JoeBiden@DrBiden funneled their book/speech income. Funneling the income through these S-corps allowed them to avoid #Medicare and #Obamacare payroll taxes... 3/
Absolutely AWFUL decision by @IndyCar to end #Indy500 under caution. Anticlimactic, and deprived the fans of the shootout we deserved. Big 👎👎👎 to @IMS@PenskeMedia@jdouglas4 for a bad call!!!
This action is also totally inconsistent with 2014 #Indy500, where @IndyCar threw a red flag with nine laps to go to guarantee a green flag finish.
The cynic in me says @IndyCar might not have thrown the red flag late in #Indy500 because @NBCSports wanted to end the broadcast by 6:00 Eastern. If so, that would make a bad decision even worse...
I mentioned this episode back in December, and @Jeopardy just reaired the proof for all the people who thought January 1st started a new decade. It didn’t!
And the INCORRECT response given by all three contestants...
THREAD: @standorn@FamiliesUSA released a study about the uninsured and #COVID19 that includes both material inaccuracies and material omissions, inflating the estimated number of uninsured as a result.
RT/follow along for details... 1/
The report takes estimates of job losses from February to May, and multiplies them using an @urbaninstitute formula of coverage changes from 2014-2018, to estimate coverage losses during the current recession. But the report has two flaws... 2/ familiesusa.org/wp-content/upl…
First, on at least a couple of occasions, it makes definitive -- and unwarranted -- statements. It claims "more than one in seven adults (16%) IS NOW UNINSURED."
In other words, it takes ESTIMATES and conflates them into FACT -- without a little thing called EVIDENCE. 3/
Finally had a chance to ponder all the old @NASCAR races I'd like to see. And when I say "old," I mean before the @NASCARONFOX TV deal started in 2001.