Chris Jacobs Profile picture
Sep 24, 2020 19 tweets 10 min read Read on X
THREAD: Ahead of @realDonaldTrump speech on #healthcare, it's worth looking at how @JoeBiden's plan likely will undermine the existing system of employer health coverage.

Details in my report available here -- or follow/RT this thread... 1/ juniperresearchgroup.com/post/5608/how-…
Regarding employer coverage, @JoeBiden's health plan contains two key features. First, it would allow individuals who have an offer of employer coverage to go to the Exchanges and receive subsidies -- right now, they can't do that in most cases... 2/ joebiden.com/healthcare/#
Second, @JoeBiden wants to increase #Exchange subsidies. He would allow individuals with incomes over 400% of poverty (about $100K for a family of four) to qualify for them (they can't now). But he also wants to expand the existing subsidies for those under 400% of poverty... 3/
@JoeBiden has said he wants to reduce the share of income paid out-of-pocket by families in premiums, and increase deductible/co-payment assistance.

He specified exactly what the new subsidies would look like -- but his plan cites an @urbaninstitute paper with specifics... 4/
I used the @urbaninstitute specifications cited in @JoeBiden's health plan, and compared how people would fare compared to the existing averages for employer coverage, based on @AHRQNews' #MEPS data... 5/
As you can see from the chart, my analysis shows that virtually all individuals and families with incomes below 200% of poverty would have major financial incentives to switch to the #Exchanges under @JoeBiden plan... 6/ Image
Some individuals and families with incomes between 200-300% of poverty would have major financial incentives to switch out of employer coverage as well, although those incentives would be less for many individuals, per the below... 7/ Image
I found that, if 90% of households who would save at least $100/month by switching to the Exchange do so, and 50% who would save some money, but less than $100/month, switch coverage, a total of 24 million individuals will switch from employer coverage to the Exchanges... 8/
Some people might say that's a good thing -- families of modest means will benefit, so who's complaining?

Except there will be significant consequences for the rest of the system too. 9/
For one, covering these 24 million people will cost the federal government a total of $2.2 trillion in new Exchange subsidies, I estimate.

And this spending does NOTHING to lower the uninsured rate -- it's a straight cost-shift from the private sector to the government... 10/ Image
For another, if people switch to subsidized Exchange plans, their employers could face higher taxes.

@JoeBiden hasn't said whether he would tax businesses whose workers switch to the Exchanges, but if he does, those would cost about $481 billion over ten years... 11/
Finally, I estimate about 64% of those who would switch coverage are under age 35. That means employers would be left with an older (read: sicker) pool of employees -- which may prompt them to drop coverage entirely... 12/
In other words, @JoeBiden's changes could hasten the collapse of employer coverage.

@avalerehealth estimates that @amprog plan (similar to Biden's) would cause 14 MILLION people to lose coverage, because employers will cancel their insurance... 13/ americanprogress.org/issues/healthc…
Some people on the Left have responded by saying they don't like their employer plan, and wouldn't mind seeing a new system.

But when rolling out his health care platform, @JoeBiden said "If you like your employer plan, you can keep it." 14/ politifact.com/article/2019/j…
Not only is that promise one @JoeBiden can never keep, his policies would likely lead to employers dropping health coverage... 15/
The real object of @JoeBiden's health plan becomes apparent in the context of @KamalaHarris' infamous comments last year about banning private health insurance: "Let's eliminate all of that. Let's move on." 16/
Giving people big (and costly) incentives to switch to the #Exchanges and out of employer coverage is a major step towards eliminating private insurance. That's the ultimate outcome of @JoeBiden's health plan... 17/
If you're interested in learning more, my @WSJopinion op-ed from earlier this week summarizes my report... 18/ wsj.com/articles/your-…
Or you can read the report itself on my website here. Either way, it's an issue you'll be hearing a LOT more about should we end up with a @JoeBiden presidency... FIN juniperresearchgroup.com/post/5608/how-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Jacobs

Chris Jacobs Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chrisjacobsHC

Feb 8, 2023
THREAD: @JoeBiden attacked @GOP in #SOTU for wanting to 1) sunset Medicare/SS, 2) “cut” those programs, and hold the debt ceiling hostage to pass those “cuts.”

As we’ll see, those are all things BIDEN PROPOSED HIMSELF.

Follow/RT for additional details… 1/
Let’s start with sunsetting Medicare/SS. This is a topic @JoeBiden should be very familiar with—because he proposed it himself. In 1975, he sponsored a bill (S. 2067, 94th Congress) to sunset all federal programs every four years. 2/
Here’s the language of the bill, which revokes authorizations for all federal programs—including SS and Medicare—after four (not five) fiscal years. 3/ Image
Read 19 tweets
Sep 29, 2020
BREAKING: @JoeBiden AGAIN dodged thousands of dollars in #Obamacare and #Medicare taxes in his 2019 tax returns. RT/follow along for more details, as I update my @WSJopinion piece in real time...
wsj.com/articles/how-t…
@JoeBiden and @DrBiden released their 2019 tax returns a little bit ago -- you can view them here. They show the Bidens again used a loophole that I profiled in my @WSJopinion piece... 2/ joebiden.com/wp-content/upl…
The issue involves two corporations, CelticCapri Corp. and Giacoppa Corp., through which @JoeBiden @DrBiden funneled their book/speech income. Funneling the income through these S-corps allowed them to avoid #Medicare and #Obamacare payroll taxes... 3/
Read 11 tweets
Aug 23, 2020
Absolutely AWFUL decision by @IndyCar to end #Indy500 under caution. Anticlimactic, and deprived the fans of the shootout we deserved. Big 👎👎👎 to @IMS @PenskeMedia @jdouglas4 for a bad call!!!
This action is also totally inconsistent with 2014 #Indy500, where @IndyCar threw a red flag with nine laps to go to guarantee a green flag finish.

The drivers, teams, and fans all deserve CONSISTENT calls by @IndyCar. They didn’t get it today. usatoday.com/story/sports/m…
The cynic in me says @IndyCar might not have thrown the red flag late in #Indy500 because @NBCSports wanted to end the broadcast by 6:00 Eastern. If so, that would make a bad decision even worse...
Read 4 tweets
Jul 21, 2020
I mentioned this episode back in December, and @Jeopardy just reaired the proof for all the people who thought January 1st started a new decade. It didn’t! Image
Image
And the INCORRECT response given by all three contestants... Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 14, 2020
THREAD: @standorn @FamiliesUSA released a study about the uninsured and #COVID19 that includes both material inaccuracies and material omissions, inflating the estimated number of uninsured as a result.

RT/follow along for details... 1/
The report takes estimates of job losses from February to May, and multiplies them using an @urbaninstitute formula of coverage changes from 2014-2018, to estimate coverage losses during the current recession. But the report has two flaws... 2/ familiesusa.org/wp-content/upl…
First, on at least a couple of occasions, it makes definitive -- and unwarranted -- statements. It claims "more than one in seven adults (16%) IS NOW UNINSURED."

In other words, it takes ESTIMATES and conflates them into FACT -- without a little thing called EVIDENCE. 3/
Read 16 tweets
May 2, 2020
Finally had a chance to ponder all the old @NASCAR races I'd like to see. And when I say "old," I mean before the @NASCARONFOX TV deal started in 2001.

In no particular order, they include... 1/
Have to start with the 1979 Daytona 500 @DISupdates. Talk about a finish! "And THERE'S A FIGHT!!!"
The other obvious @DISupdates selection: 1984 Firecracker 400 -- King @RPMotorsports' 200th win... 3/
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(