New York compared with Liverpool: Schools

A Thread
The @WSJ is reporting that

"New York City on Wednesday will close public schools and nonessential businesses in parts of Brooklyn and Queens that have registered a week-long spike in coronavirus cases"

wsj.com/articles/new-y…
Let's look at New York and then compare to a UK city, Liverpool.
Cases are high in some New York boroughs. Up to 216 cases per 100,000 per week. But school closures are also being implemented in areas with 89 cases per 100,000 (source: NYT nytimes.com/interactive/20… )
Let's compare with Liverpool. Here is the latest @PHE_uk report. Liverpool has cases of 238 cases per 100,000 in a week. Which is slightly higher than the highest rate ZIP code in NYC.

But remember, Liverpool's figures are for the whole local authority.
Let's look a little deeper into Liverpool. Here's the map. We can see some areas with incidence in excess of *1200* cases per 100,000. That's very high. And don't forget this is *detected* cases. The number of cases will be much higher.
But how do we know that there hasn't been enough testing? We look at positivity. Positivity is the number of people who test positive divided by the number of people tested.

And this is what NYC uses to determine whether schools should be closed.

schools.nyc.gov/school-year-20…
If an area of NYC has positivity greater than 3% - three in every 100 tests being positive - then schools close.

What does positivity tell us? Whether enough tests are being performed.
"the World Health Organization recommended in May that the percent positive remain below 5% for at least two weeks before governments consider reopening."

jhsph.edu/covid-19/artic…
So, given that positivity is set at a threshold of 3% for school closures in NYC

and WHO suggest 5% before reopening, this begs the question -

What is the positivity in Liverpool?
Just under 15%, according to the latest published data (PHE week 40 reporting).

Which means that around 15% of all tests in Liverpool come back positive.

That's *very high*.

And means not enough testing is being carried out.

And this is a problem.
This is just an example of a city with large positivity. Extra testing capacity has been sent to Liverpool presumably due to students returning to universities there.

This is not a Liverpool problem - it's a national problem.
Please see my website for further information.

Happy to discuss with journalists. DMs open.

duncanrobertson.com/2020/10/04/we-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Duncan Robertson

Dr Duncan Robertson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Dr_D_Robertson

5 Oct
We may be systematically underestimating R by excluding students in halls of residence. A Thread
We know that data on the Government Coronavirus dashboard is unreliable (see this thread)
We also know that we are not doing enough testing as the positivity rate is so high (7% overall for Pillar 2 tests and up to 15% in some areas such as Liverpool) (see this thread)
Read 9 tweets
4 Oct
Nearly 23,000 Covid-19 cases were reported today. This is due to a delay.

Analysis thread.
Public Health England have released a statement. It is here: gov.uk/government/new…

First, note that the Department of Health and Social care is the data controller for Pillar 2 tests. It passes these data to Public Health England, and DHSC are responsible for the data.
The statement says:
"we have identified that 15,841 cases between 25 September and 2 October were not included in the reported daily COVID-19 cases"
Read 14 tweets
3 Oct
.@NAOorguk @CommonsSTC - can you investigate the delays in today's Covid reporting? If it's just a delay in reporting, that's one thing, but if these are delays into NHS Test and Trace system, that's another thing entirely. Would be good to see age/source of delayed cases
It is important to understand the reason for the delay. If this is a reporting delay, that is bad enough, but if there have been delays in putting these cases into the NHS Test and Trace database, that can have serious implications for spreading the disease
We also need to know if there is commonality in the source of these cases. We have seen that private testing and university testing has been carried out, and it is still not clear how these results (both positive and negative) are being routed into the DHSC system.
Read 7 tweets
2 Oct
The latest Covid surveillance report has been published by Public Health England. Here is my commentary. The main point is that Covid is now widely established, not only in the north and the midlands but also north London and for the first time in Cornwall Image
The data is for week 39 (between 21 September and 27 September. First, positivity. This is the number of positive cases divided by the number of tests. It's now around 7%. THIS MEANS THAT NOT ENOUGH TESTS ARE BEING PERFORMED (@WHO recommend this does not exceed 5%) Image
Age pyramid of cases in the last two weeks. Mostly capturing younger people. Image
Read 15 tweets
2 Oct
Well done to @OfficialUoM for publishing positive Covid cases at the university. manchester.ac.uk/coronavirus/ca… This draws attention to the university, and raises questions as to why this hasn't been updated for a few days. But it is a good thing to be public, and should be encouraged. Image
.@sheffielduni also publish data - well done, particularly for keeping the info up to date. sheffield.ac.uk/autumn-term-20… Image
We can see apparent outbreaks at other universities. Here's the location of @UniofExeter (21-27 September cases) - would be good to have a dashboard of cases. Image
Read 8 tweets
1 Oct
Comment on the proposed Merseyside / Liverpool 'lockdown'. Let's look at Liverpool. #merseyside #liverpool
Some say that cases are plateauing and therefore there isn't a problem. From the data, this could be the case. Image
Liverpool is at around 150 cases per 100,000 in the last PHE report Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!