We also know that we are not doing enough testing as the positivity rate is so high (7% overall for Pillar 2 tests and up to 15% in some areas such as Liverpool) (see this thread)
So, how do we go about estimating R? Here's a thread I wrote in January explaining R in relation to Covid-19 (which then didn't have an official name) duncanrobertson.com/2020/01/24/con…
To estimate R, we carry out surveys - which means you pick a representative group of people, either households or individuals, and test them repeatedly.
There are two main surveys: ONS and REACT
ONS excludes student halls of residence, as 'only private residential households, otherwise known as the target population in this bulletin, are included in the sample. People in hospitals, care homes and other institutional settings are not included' ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
The REACT survey uses GP lists to generate its sample of people who are tested.
But of course, new students are only just registering with their GPs, and it is unclear when the GP lists were pulled for the latest study (Round 5 of REACT-1, 18-26 Sep)
First, note that the Department of Health and Social care is the data controller for Pillar 2 tests. It passes these data to Public Health England, and DHSC are responsible for the data.
The statement says:
"we have identified that 15,841 cases between 25 September and 2 October were not included in the reported daily COVID-19 cases"
"New York City on Wednesday will close public schools and nonessential businesses in parts of Brooklyn and Queens that have registered a week-long spike in coronavirus cases"
.@NAOorguk@CommonsSTC - can you investigate the delays in today's Covid reporting? If it's just a delay in reporting, that's one thing, but if these are delays into NHS Test and Trace system, that's another thing entirely. Would be good to see age/source of delayed cases
It is important to understand the reason for the delay. If this is a reporting delay, that is bad enough, but if there have been delays in putting these cases into the NHS Test and Trace database, that can have serious implications for spreading the disease
We also need to know if there is commonality in the source of these cases. We have seen that private testing and university testing has been carried out, and it is still not clear how these results (both positive and negative) are being routed into the DHSC system.
The latest Covid surveillance report has been published by Public Health England. Here is my commentary. The main point is that Covid is now widely established, not only in the north and the midlands but also north London and for the first time in Cornwall
The data is for week 39 (between 21 September and 27 September. First, positivity. This is the number of positive cases divided by the number of tests. It's now around 7%. THIS MEANS THAT NOT ENOUGH TESTS ARE BEING PERFORMED (@WHO recommend this does not exceed 5%)
Age pyramid of cases in the last two weeks. Mostly capturing younger people.
Well done to @OfficialUoM for publishing positive Covid cases at the university. manchester.ac.uk/coronavirus/ca… This draws attention to the university, and raises questions as to why this hasn't been updated for a few days. But it is a good thing to be public, and should be encouraged.
We can see apparent outbreaks at other universities. Here's the location of @UniofExeter (21-27 September cases) - would be good to have a dashboard of cases.