Warmly recommend @MarietjeSchaake calling for democracies to work together for rules-based international order on tech governance. Also note examples: UN, WTO, NATO - indication of what best-case long-term prospects are in terms of scope, legitimacy, pace? technologyreview.com/2020/09/29/100…
I'm glad she mentions these, because it is easy to call in abstract for "democracies to get together globally to do something about something"
When looking at actual examples of democracies, or democracies and others, getting together globally to do something, it is much messier
When looking at actual examples of democracies, or democracies and others, getting together globally to do something, it is much messier
Also note: conspicious absence of large-scale "positive policy" - changes/additions to existing rules+regulations is sometimes oversight (policymakers not across issue, not gotten to it) or gridlock, other times what academics call "negative policy": deliberate non-intervention.
Take info ops by foreign states. Tech cos have been slow to act against these. Arguably, many countries have been even slower, politics has complicated response. Now imagine how UN would have dealt w/this (veto in security council?), WTO (makes decision by consensus), NATO (same)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
