However, in e.g. UK, our work suggests initial surge in news use quickly faded, news avoidance grew throughout the crisis, and more than a third think news coverage has made the coronavirus crisis worse. Only 7% think journalism has made things better reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/most-uk-say-ne… 3/8
And more broadly, while news use is up, still small share of internet use overall, and heavily concentrated among few national publishers.
In US, comScore data suggests, news was ~4.5% of internet use in Feb, up to ~5.5% in March as crisis kicked off, back to ~4.6% in Aug
4/8
Though that's sobering, encouraging news is that now - unlike a few years back - we have multiple clear proofs that there are sustainable business models for digital news. Distinct, high value-add, digital-first news demonstably works, even if clearly winner-takes-most market 5/8
That means elite - affluent high-interest privileged people like me - will be well served. Two severe challenges remain: local news and reaching wider public.
Local was long run essentially as smaller versions of national. I don't think that will work in digital environment 6/8
In most cases, the critical mass of attention (and thus ads) and/or subscriptions just do not seem to be there for local = smaller version of national newspapers.
And in terms of national, while elite is well served, most people aren't paying, and many say they never will.
7/8
So hope we'll congratulate successful national elite titles, learn from them, then move on to think about how local news, and news for wider public of less affluent people who often distrust+don't rate media, and aren't willing to pay, can demonstrate value and be sustainable 8/8
Warmly recommend @MarietjeSchaake calling for democracies to work together for rules-based international order on tech governance. Also note examples: UN, WTO, NATO - indication of what best-case long-term prospects are in terms of scope, legitimacy, pace? technologyreview.com/2020/09/29/100…
I'm glad she mentions these, because it is easy to call in abstract for "democracies to get together globally to do something about something"
When looking at actual examples of democracies, or democracies and others, getting together globally to do something, it is much messier
Also note: conspicious absence of large-scale "positive policy" - changes/additions to existing rules+regulations is sometimes oversight (policymakers not across issue, not gotten to it) or gridlock, other times what academics call "negative policy": deliberate non-intervention.
We all live somewhere, not nowhere, and appealing to and contributing to that sense of place is one of the opportunities in an otherwise very challenging environment for local news.
Competition for attention, ads, and $$$ is brutal, and I expect many local news media will continue to see revenues shrink, that some will close, and more consolidation (will latter help?).
1) More people say they are interested in local news than politics 2) Interest in local news more equal across differences in e.g. education 3) Local news often trusted, also across political divides
News consumption "at most 14.2% of Americans’ daily media diets", @_JenAllen et al finds, and identified "fake news" about 0.15%. Their results suggest misinformedness and polarization more likely to be due to "ordinary news or the avoidance" than fakery advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/14/e…
Meta-analysis by @jennifer_oser@DrBoulianne support "reinforcement effect, whereby those who are already politically active are motivated to use digital media"&suggest digital media "contribute to increased inequality in political participation over time" academic.oup.com/poq/article/84…
"Democratic Creative Destruction?" Discussing work done with @dragz at @StanfordCyber event, moderated by @persily.
Key empirical slides below, some links to research we build on, event link, and the chapter is available in the open access book here cambridge.org/core/books/soc… 1/14
We frame the issue as “democratic creative destruction” that challenges incumbent institutions, creates new ones, and in many ways empower individual citizens-even as change also leaves both individuals and institutions increasingly dependent on large US-based tech companies 2/14
INSTITUTIONALLY, the ongoing move to a more digital, more mobile, and more platform-dominated media environment has made news more abundant and more accessible but existentially threatens the business models that funded professional news production in the twentieth century 3/14
“The world has changed,” new BBC DG Tim Davie said. “If we really care about this precious institution we must protect it by reforming it.”
Below a few pieces I've written on future of public service and some of the (existential) challenges BBC faces 1/5 on.ft.com/3bsAAVX
First (not me!) read @Nadine_Writes reporting on experience of some current+former black employees: “The BBC is institutionally racist. The institution was never built for us but we were allowed to come in." BBC also has challenge around audience here huffingtonpost.co.uk/amp/entry/bbc-… 2/5
Then me from June: "rallying around the Beeb does not change the fact that the BBC faces existential challenges, including political criticism from both the right and the left and, most fundamentally, waning public attention" reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/risj-review/wo… 3/5