5 days after Kunming bus bombing (21/07/2008) for which Turkistan Islamic Party 'claimed' responsibility, Rice warned China that "security threats have to be dealt with... But security should not become in any way a cover to try and deal with dissent." app.ft.com/content/c361bb…
Her words struck me at the time & I thought: Wow! That just sent an interesting message both to Beijing and its opponents in Xinjiang. Back then I had a gut feeling that this wouldn't augur well for Xinjiang. Within 15 days Kashgar attacks and Kuqa sucide bombing occurred.
I was baffled by her message because that was during the height of the US-led war on terrorism, and in the wake of Bush Jr.'s stark message that "either you're with us or you're with the terrorists". It seemed clear that the US wasn't really with China re its terrorist problems.
That's my impression anyway. Now here we are regarding Xinjiang. I can't claim any foresight, however - things could have taken different turns entirely, and there're so many factors at play. But for some reason that message from Rice has stayed with me since.
In light of what has unfolded since then (I'd say fairly predictable), did Rice and the like really care about the fate of Uighurs in Xinjiang? I very much doubt it. After all, it's not them who bear the consequences.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chengxin Pan

Chengxin Pan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChengxinPan

7 Oct
Great news folks! There's never been a better time to become a China analyst. Besides the mentoring opportunities offered by US intelligence gurus, and the plentiful amount of financial support from defence sectors, now you can gain instance fame simply by using Google.
Seriously, the Googlisation of China studies is THE best & most groundbreaking paradigm shift in the field's history, ever. Wannabe even more cutting-edge? Remember Google Maps? No Chinese language skills, no problem! Google Translate just a click away. What are you waiting for?
This field has really come a long way from the days when China watchers had to repeatedly go to two mainland informants in Hong Kong for their fieldwork studies on China. Scientific knowledge does experience accumulation and progress after all. e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/knowl…
Read 4 tweets
27 Sep
Engage in your research in good faith I did. It's by your (ASPI) own admission that your research is based on 'highly suspected', 'possible camps', 'could be', waiting-for-coroboration-type speculation and insinuation. There is nothing good faith about this type of practice ImageImage
and it's everything against the spirit of research. Also research in good faith, in this case, China's policy in Xinjiang, should be to engage with the policy and its pros and cons. Like China's one-child policy, or any Chinese policy, it should be scrutinised and criticised.
But such criticisms should be based on solid evidence and bona fide intentions to help improve its policy, or help it changed. And research in good faith should also invite or at least welcome others to scrutinise one's own research, rather than trying to silence and intimidate
Read 23 tweets
27 Sep
ASPI's report's Turpan Detention Center Facility #7 & Facility #1 turn out to be Gaochang District Bureau for Veterans Affairs and Gaochang District Bureau for Business & Industry Informationisation respectively. The smoking gun is that they both have external walls!
I swear most Chinese work units & government compounds have external walls, so do most Chinese schools, universities & gated communities. And don't forget the Great Wall, which means that the entire country inside the wall has been a giant concentration camp.
Satellite images of my primary & senior high schools - both with external walls!! But who knows, they may have been recently converted into detention center facilities! I boarded at the high school for 3 years & was only able to go home once a month. Sounds eerily familiar right?
Read 23 tweets
26 Sep
Since when was diplomacy ('mask/vacine/boycott/hostage diplomacy') made more threatening than actual wars? Since when did 'weaponising' take on a more terrifying undertone than routinely using real weapons? Since when was soft power sharper & more loathed than hard power?
Since when did technology transfer become more universally hated than daily wage theft? Since when was population growth of ethnic minorities worse than accomplished genocide? Since when was protecting people's lives in a pandemic more inhumane than protecting the bottom line?
Since when did building bridges, ports and roads become more destructive, more oppressive and more imperialist than indiscriminate bombing and slave trade? Since when did aid & investment in infrastructure become more insidious and more barbaric than crippling sanctions?
Read 4 tweets
12 Sep
Who/what is the West's main threat is mainly up to the West to decide & define. Threats can be in & out of fashion as 'we' please & as per the agenda-setting media. Not long ago, every muslim looked like a terrorist; now, every Chinese citizen is a spy. floridapolitics.com/archives/33585…
“One of the things we’re trying to do is view the China threat as not just a whole-of-government threat, but a whole-of-society threat on their end.” FBI Director Christopher Wray. businessinsider.com.au/china-threat-t…
If most 'respectable' Western media outlets (NYT, WaPo, CNN, BBC, The Economist) decide to run on a regularly basis a narrative that every Chinese pet is a spy risk, I bet it would only take about six months for 60% of their Western readers/viewers to believe in it.
Read 4 tweets
10 Sep
I had experience with a journal, which took the trouble to update me on their waiting for 2nd review. They promised 'as soon as we get the full reviews in we will proceed to decision'. I thought it's very nice of them because it's rare to receive unsolicited update from editors.
Two months later they sent 2 reports with R1 saying 'This is an exceptionally well written article...[R1's suggestions are] not essential prior to publication'. R2, however, believes 'the manuscript does not seem to fit very well with the journal'. The editors rejected the paper.
The letter says "this decision is much more about 'fit' than it is about quality". Nice cold comfort, though I thought it's poor form from them who should've desk-rejected it if it's about 'fit', rather than outsourcing such judgment to R2 & wasting everyone's time. Given that...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!