New #TitleIX blog post up from @EDcivilrights regarding the NIBRS and SRS definitions of sexual assault, plus some additional information on dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking. Let's take a peek, shall we? www2.ed.gov/about/offices/…
The blog post discusses the NIBRS and SRS definitions. Previous guidance from the OPEN Center--not reflected in this blog--suggests that schools can pick their own definitions as long as they cover all of the offenses described. atixa.org/open-center/ho…
The blog does not repeat the threshold language re: domestic violence to remind that it is only sexual harassment if it is "on the basis of sex." The definition given will, in many states, encompass child abuse and other domestic violence that is not related to sex.
Bottom line: there are still clarifications that would be helpful. But it's another piece of the compliance puzzle.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Melissa Carleton

Melissa Carleton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MCarletonOhio

9 Oct
The 2016 Clery Handbook just got rescinded. ifap.ed.gov/electronic-ann… #Clery #TitleIX #highered Shall we peruse the replacement?
The announcement says the Handbook "created additional requirements and expanded the scope of the statute and regulations." ED says they are concerned "some institutions may have felt pressured to satisfy the non-regulatory or non-statutory based aspects of the guidance..." 👀
Check out their description of your Annual Security Report (which isn't due until 12/31, btw): Quote: Our goal was to prov...
Read 18 tweets
15 May
Some folks have been asking questions about the #TitleIX regulation that prohibits the use of a statement by a party or witness that does not submit to cross-exam at a hearing: "Can we have someone else testify about what they said?"
Let me point you to some commentary that the U.S. Department of Education offered on this point along with the final regs. Citations are to the unofficial version posted on ED's website: www2.ed.gov/about/offices/…
Page 1169: "– “If a party or witness makes a statement in the video [and then doesn’t appear for cross-examination], then the decision-maker may not rely on the statement of that party or witness in reaching a determination regarding responsibility.”
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!