The announcement says the Handbook "created additional requirements and expanded the scope of the statute and regulations." ED says they are concerned "some institutions may have felt pressured to satisfy the non-regulatory or non-statutory based aspects of the guidance..." 👀
Check out their description of your Annual Security Report (which isn't due until 12/31, btw):
Clery Geography: "the Department will no longer apply any specific measurable distance definition to 'reasonably contiguous' geographic area." Also removes the definitions of "owned or controlled by" and "directly supports"
The announcement says it has "addressed the issues identified in the above-referenced Senate Report regarding reporting crimes that occur during institution sponsored stay-away trips..." Be still my beating heart. Hold on - let me scope this out...
And... the new appendix says nothing about trips, so looks like that just went poof.
They are not happy with the illustrations in Chapter 2 of the 2016 Handbook re: geography, as they "may create more confusion than they resolve."
Now crime definitions need to come from the regulatory sources, not the Handbook. Now that we've all spent time digging into some of those for #TitleIX policy writing, we can all cozy up to NIBRS even more now. But, confusingly, the regs refer to SRS, which is on its way out.
They say that the changes will also pare down who is a CSA to people who actually have a "significant responsibility for student and campus activities." Time to revisit those policies and retrain.
The new appendix says, "The Department will defer to an institution's designation of CSAs as authoritative," so there's that.
The notice about the new appendix ends with the reassuring sentence, "None of the changes in the Appendix impact the July 10, 2020 temporary extension (to December 31, 2020) that the Department provided, regarding Clery reporting due to COVID-19."
So - time to revise your annual security report now, before December 31st?
My hot take (which will evolve as I dig in more, I'm sure) - this will take some extra obligations away, but it also takes away some guidance that was actually helpful to understand how the Department was interpreting things. If this means more deference to schools, great.
If it means that the "real" rules for interpretation are a mystery until you violate them... Well, I hope that's not where we're landing when there is a $55k fine at stake. Fingers crossed.
PS - The Handbook rescission may be my fault. I finally printed myself a hard copy yesterday, and with 2020 karma, maybe this was bound to happen. 🤣
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New #TitleIX blog post up from @EDcivilrights regarding the NIBRS and SRS definitions of sexual assault, plus some additional information on dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking. Let's take a peek, shall we? www2.ed.gov/about/offices/…
The blog post discusses the NIBRS and SRS definitions. Previous guidance from the OPEN Center--not reflected in this blog--suggests that schools can pick their own definitions as long as they cover all of the offenses described. atixa.org/open-center/ho…
The blog does not repeat the threshold language re: domestic violence to remind that it is only sexual harassment if it is "on the basis of sex." The definition given will, in many states, encompass child abuse and other domestic violence that is not related to sex.
Some folks have been asking questions about the #TitleIX regulation that prohibits the use of a statement by a party or witness that does not submit to cross-exam at a hearing: "Can we have someone else testify about what they said?"
Let me point you to some commentary that the U.S. Department of Education offered on this point along with the final regs. Citations are to the unofficial version posted on ED's website: www2.ed.gov/about/offices/…
Page 1169: "– “If a party or witness makes a statement in the video [and then doesn’t appear for cross-examination], then the decision-maker may not rely on the statement of that party or witness in reaching a determination regarding responsibility.”