THREAD -- RIDDING OHIO OF Jim Jordan AND THE NATION'S WORST GERRYMANDERING
All of those who want to get rid of Jim Jordan, and his antics, please read this thread
Jordan is an Ohio embarrassment. A national embarrassment. But he's also a symptom of a much bigger problem...
1/
Gerrymandering.
Ohio's gerrymandering--as bad as any in the nation--is not only destroying any semblance of a functional political system in Ohio govt--but it's sending the likes of Jordan to Congress with no accountability.
So he gets away with his antics again and again.
2/
Here is a map of Jim Jordan's district. Yes, it looks like a duck, twisting and turning from Lorain down to Urbana (!)
But the deeper problem is that it's rigged. It's designed in a way that allows Jordan to act like he does, every day, with no accountability back in Ohio.
3/
So for someone like Jordan, he views his re-election every two years as akin to a reappointment. His rigged district doesn't matter to him.
And his outrageous actions every day in Washington are completely unmoored from his district, or the needs of the people back home.
4/
And he's not the only one. All around Ohio, the districts are designed in all sorts of absurd ways, ways that have nothing to do with representation of Ohio needs.
Here's the 6th, and if you haven't watched Bill Johnson, he basically acts just like Jordan.
5/
And here's the district they drew for @RepMarcyKaptur in order to pit two Democrats against each other and guarantee GOP wins elsewhere. There are points of the district where you need snorkel gear to get through.
Of course, Marcy does a great job regardless.
6/
And if you wonder why Steve Chabot is still in office when he is so out of touch with the needs of Hamilton Cty, look no further than this map. A city split in 1/2
It extended his career by another 10 years even though no one can figure out what he actually does in Congress
7/
I could go on
The bottom line is that this is why OH sends the likes of Jordan, Chabot, Johnson to DC year after year
And they also rest at the heart of the corrupt & extreme politics of the mask-hating, science-denying, abortion-banning freakshow that is the OH Statehouse
8/
The rigged districts have made Ohio legislatures wholly unrepresentative of Ohio. Example:
In 2018, the statehouse breakdown in voting across Ohio was 50% R, 49% D. What was the result of that 50-50 breakdown in districts?
Republicans have 61 districts, Democrats 38 (!)
9/
For Congress?
52% of Ohioans voted for a Republican, 47% for a Democrat.
The outcome? 12 GOP districts vs. 4 Dem districts.
This is not a democracy.
And that's all bad news.....
10/
But here's the good news: THIS CAN ALL BE FIXED IN 27 DAYS!
Second, that's also true in the statehouse. We have an amazing slate of candidates running across Ohio, and we will flip more seats from red to blue despite the gerrymandering.
BUT we also have a chance to rid ourselves of this rigged, corrupt system once and for all.
12/
But we need your help to get it done. Here's how:
Twice, OH voters overwhelmingly voted to change our OH constitution in recent years. To rid ourselves of the extreme partisan gerrymandering that enables Jordan, Nino Vitale and John Becker.
But step 2 is to ensure that we have a FAIR COURT that will both construe & enforce the new language for what it says -- an END to partisan gerrymandering
The OH Supreme Court will be THE court that reviews any attempt to gerrymander again
14/
So THIS is the opportunity of our generation, to unrig Ohio politics.
Currently, after Ohio Dems won both races in 2018, the court has a 5-2 GOP majority.
But we have two Dem candidates challenging incumbents right now. We win both races, we flip the court to 4-3 Dems.
15/
And the precedent is clear--when you have a fair state supreme court, it means the end of partisan gerrymandering in that state.
Pennsylvania is a perfect example. A fair court toppled their terrible gerrymandering:
On Day 1: A profile of a long-time GOP, Ohio suburban county: Butler
1) The number of requests by registered Democrats has already tripled from those requested in all of 2016, thus erasing what had been an over 3:1 Republican advantage in 2012 and 2016. Dems slightly lead.
1/
2) The number of requests from registered Democrats with a month to go is over 2,000 higher than the Democratic requests in 2008 and less than 500 requests fewer than the registered Republican requests in all of the 2016 general election.
2/
3) In terms of the share of the early vote, the Democratic requests are nearly double the share of the vote they were in 2016 and substantially closer to the turnout in 2008 than 2012 or 2016.
BREAKING: for months, Ohio's SOS Larose has claimed that he wanted to expand drop boxes in Ohio counties, but that Ohio law prevented him from doing so.
Just now, all three judges in our drop box appeal agreed with us that nothing in Ohio law prevents him from adding more.
1/
"We agree with the trial court that the Secretary's interpretation of R.C. 3509.05 is not reasonable and that the statute neither prescribes nor prohibits ballot drop boxes at locations other than the boards of elections....
2/
"...If, as appellees argue, the Secretary wants to permit additional drop boxes, he has the authority to do so and nothing in this decision prohibits him from rescinding Directive 2020-16 and issuing a new directive accordingly."
3/
Re-watch them if you can. Pressed again and again, he not only refused to say he'd accept the results of the election...he actually made clear that there are millions of votes he has no intention of counting if he has his way.
Here he said it again: "he even agrees with several of the changes proposed. But, despite advocates’ insistence to the contrary, LaRose does not feel he has the authority to take these actions unilaterally..."
Important voting rights update in Ohio: for two years, Ohio's SOS has claimed he could not allow online or electronic applications for absentee ballots. Ohio law didn't permit it, he said, insisting he needed legislative approval.
We went to court to show he was wrong...
1/
Several weeks ago, a common pleas court agreed with us, but he (of course) appealed immediately.
This afternoon, we got our ruling on that appeal.
The disappointing news is that we did not get the relief/injunction we were seeking immediately.
The good news? ...
2/
Like the court below, the appeals court agreed that nothing in OH law prevents the acceptance of electronic applications of absentee ballots: "Having reviewed R.C. 3509.03, we find the plain language of the Gen'l Assembly does not prohibit qualified electors from making.."
3/