/1 One caveat to this @Jesse_Livermore and @patrick_oshag...

Friedman's maxim "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon" is somewhat apt here -- albeit somewhat inaccurate in its original context (i.e. money supply causation)...

/2 @Jesse_Livermore correctly draws a line between fiscal and monetary stimulus vis a vis inflation...

However, we did not see much spending or inflation spike after the 2008 or 2020 fiscal stimuli because of *expectations*...
/3 @ReformedBroker made observations similar to yours in his recent post (thereformedbroker.com/2020/10/07/les…)...

and it *sounds* correct because of what we know about marginal propensity to consume vs save (MPC vs MPS) from classical econ...

but it's *not* accurate in COVID-19 economy... Image
/4 again, people's expectations (and the nature of this pandemic-driven recession's SIP/WFH) caused a lot of that stimulus to cold-stored in savings, rather than consumption... Image
/5 That's partially due to necessarily tepid qualitative forward guidance from fiscal authorities (as opposed to Fed)...

e.g. Despite higher income fm unemployment benefits, the perception that 'these programs are temporary' incentivized job applications:
/6 The spike in saving (as opposed to spending and inflation) was likely also due to psychological/behavioral factors...

e.g. "Depression Babies 2.0":
/7 Def agree (and have written) that there's a far out point of hyperinflation and nobody knows where that point lay – $100T is a good enough guess for me...

/8 but, again, even during this pandemic, $3T in fiscal stimulus would have produced some measurable inflation had it come with the equivalent of a "Greenspan Put" for fiscal policy...
/9 Counterfactual: '2020 inflation has been a lot higher than it would have been sans stimulus'...

🤔, the nature of COVID-19 (e.g. fears of supply shortages/supply chain shutdowns) means *higher* inflation is actually a better control group to comp vs this empirical stimulus...
/10 and I'm also aware that this borders on Friedman's "permanent income hypothesis (PIH)" vis a vis expectations...
... according to my notes and highlights, @Jesse_Livermore did mention the pandemic as a caveat to in his original white paper (osam.com/Commentary/ups…)

... it's been real yo 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

Image
... interesting to think that TIPS could be the killer trade for a Blue Wave in November's elections, given implications for inflation in a streamlined Democratic federal government $TIP

... Biden victory plus Democrats sweeping Congress likely results in hella more fiscal stimulus and hotter growth:
... plus the volatility curve and investor sentiment/surveys have heavily discounted a contentious election night, etc (protracted decision and/or transition of power) $VIX Image
Jamie Dimon $JPM:

"we had massive global QE in the last go round, and we didn't have inflation... Fiscal stimulus, which has been extraordinary around the world is, by its nature, inflationary... we don't really know the outcome of that..." $TIP #TIPS

...revisiting this contingency among Blue Wave > fiscal stimulus > inflation > TIPS ():

The odds of a meaningful fiscal stimulus arriving before 2020YE have dropped precipitously to ~10% probability (goodjudgment.io/superforecasts…)

$TIP #Election2020 Image
... "An institutional case study of the period [Canada 1935-75], complemented by a general-to-specific econometric analysis, finds no support for a relationship between monetary financing and inflation."
... moar TIPS:

"inflation expectations...continue higher as the 10 yr breakeven is up another 1 bp to 1.91%, the highest since May 2019 and getting ever closer to that other magic number, made up by the Fed, of 2%"

thereformedbroker.com/2020/12/09/inf… $TNX $TIP #CPI Image
/1
... outstanding debate between Larry Summers and Paul Krugman on Biden stimulus vs inflation:

• Both agree on economic (GDP growth) boom in 2022;

• Disagree on nature of stimulus (Krugman says disaster relief/Summers says gravy ergo high inflation)

/2
N.B. Both assume $1.9T fiscal package ("Biden stimulus") plus $1T spending bill ("Build Back Better"/BBB) spread out across 2021-22...

• Both agree that $1T BBB fiscal investment bill (infrastructure/climate/education) is most important long term priority;
/3

• Larry: Income support is ~$75B per month *more* than COVID-related losses ($100B monthly sppt vs -$25B COVID run-rate); such a large Biden stimulus lowers probability of BBB approval in 2022;

• Paul: This is like wartime spending, so output gap is wrong measuring stick

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anthony Bardaro

Anthony Bardaro Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AnthPB

19 Feb 20
@Wike_Meinstein @johnloeber @BlairReeves @nikillinit Yes, there are only 1.1k MAUs, but **all subscribers are automatically enrolled**...

If you're a subscriber and want to participate, just go to the Forum URL, which is run atop Discourse, and you just use your email and PW from your sub and there's already a profile for you...
@Wike_Meinstein @johnloeber @BlairReeves @nikillinit This might have caused a bit of a disturbance in the force (which I can understand and respect), but, to wit...

The Stratechery Forum has now removed the "Users" page where you could once view the aforementioned community data 🤷‍♂️...

@Wike_Meinstein @johnloeber @BlairReeves @nikillinit ...nevertheless, I can now confirm that the exact number of active Stratechery subscribers is 25,189 per a remaining loophole (the "Groups" option in the Forum) 🏁
Read 4 tweets
13 Dec 19
/1 Thread: With Disruption Theory having now gone mainstream, Bob Iger went to school on the Innovator's Dilemma...

#DisneyPlus $DIS $NFLX $AMZN $T #streamingwars

cc @modestproposal1 @GavinSBaker @bradsling @RichLightShed @benthompson @Rich_Barton @ballmatthew @kidkapital
/2 To gauge expectations, Iger clearly articulated his Disney+ strategic roadmap (and associated tradeoffs) to the Street...

communicating how $DIS's LT franchise opportunity offset its ST financial consequences...
/3 which amounted to an (intrinsically) high probability for Disney to reestablish a moat amidst the (lowercase "disruptive") threat of streaming...

and investors discount that fw such that $DIS (the stock) didn't dive despite sequentially deteriorating financials/guidance...
Read 11 tweets
12 Jun 19
@trengriffin /1 Priceless 😉...

There are two approaches:

🅰️ Hal Varian way of valuing it in isolation

🅱️ Tim O'Reilly way of accounting for aggregate

Since the concern here is GDP (aggregate income or output), a broader consideration like #2 is more appropriate, albeit complex...
@trengriffin /2 Take Android OS as an example of open source software's (OSS) contribution to GDP...

Going to control for output items switching fm Consumption to Investment buckets; fm expense to capitalized; fm domestic accts to EX/IM; etc...
@trengriffin /3 Also going to assume the market value of Android is $0 in isolation, which fully removes its output from real GDP (adversely)...
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!