Friedman's maxim "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon" is somewhat apt here -- albeit somewhat inaccurate in its original context (i.e. money supply causation)...
and it *sounds* correct because of what we know about marginal propensity to consume vs save (MPC vs MPS) from classical econ...
but it's *not* accurate in COVID-19 economy...
/4 again, people's expectations (and the nature of this pandemic-driven recession's SIP/WFH) caused a lot of that stimulus to cold-stored in savings, rather than consumption...
/7 Def agree (and have written) that there's a far out point of hyperinflation and nobody knows where that point lay – $100T is a good enough guess for me...
/8 but, again, even during this pandemic, $3T in fiscal stimulus would have produced some measurable inflation had it come with the equivalent of a "Greenspan Put" for fiscal policy...
/9 Counterfactual: '2020 inflation has been a lot higher than it would have been sans stimulus'...
🤔, the nature of COVID-19 (e.g. fears of supply shortages/supply chain shutdowns) means *higher* inflation is actually a better control group to comp vs this empirical stimulus...
/10 and I'm also aware that this borders on Friedman's "permanent income hypothesis (PIH)" vis a vis expectations...
... interesting to think that TIPS could be the killer trade for a Blue Wave in November's elections, given implications for inflation in a streamlined Democratic federal government $TIP
... plus the volatility curve and investor sentiment/surveys have heavily discounted a contentious election night, etc (protracted decision and/or transition of power) $VIX
Jamie Dimon $JPM:
"we had massive global QE in the last go round, and we didn't have inflation... Fiscal stimulus, which has been extraordinary around the world is, by its nature, inflationary... we don't really know the outcome of that..." $TIP #TIPS
... "An institutional case study of the period [Canada 1935-75], complemented by a general-to-specific econometric analysis, finds no support for a relationship between monetary financing and inflation."
"inflation expectations...continue higher as the 10 yr breakeven is up another 1 bp to 1.91%, the highest since May 2019 and getting ever closer to that other magic number, made up by the Fed, of 2%"
/1
... outstanding debate between Larry Summers and Paul Krugman on Biden stimulus vs inflation:
• Both agree on economic (GDP growth) boom in 2022;
• Disagree on nature of stimulus (Krugman says disaster relief/Summers says gravy ergo high inflation)
/2
N.B. Both assume $1.9T fiscal package ("Biden stimulus") plus $1T spending bill ("Build Back Better"/BBB) spread out across 2021-22...
• Both agree that $1T BBB fiscal investment bill (infrastructure/climate/education) is most important long term priority;
/3
• Larry: Income support is ~$75B per month *more* than COVID-related losses ($100B monthly sppt vs -$25B COVID run-rate); such a large Biden stimulus lowers probability of BBB approval in 2022;
• Paul: This is like wartime spending, so output gap is wrong measuring stick
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you're a subscriber and want to participate, just go to the Forum URL, which is run atop Discourse, and you just use your email and PW from your sub and there's already a profile for you...
@Wike_Meinstein@johnloeber@BlairReeves@nikillinit ...nevertheless, I can now confirm that the exact number of active Stratechery subscribers is 25,189 per a remaining loophole (the "Groups" option in the Forum) 🏁