I have been asked about how I do “workshops” in social science courses. I have to explain something first.
As most (all) of you know, I left CIDE this summer and moved to an Associate Professor position at FLACSO.
This move meant that, while no longer full time CIDE faculty,
... I still had course and student supervision commitments. I was not about to ditch my colleagues and students and leave abruptly. Thus (with the approval of FLACSO), this semester I continued teaching the courses I had promised I would, and supervising my CIDE thesis students.
One of my leftover CIDE courses is Public Policy Analysis. This is a third year course (5th semester), which I teach in English (because I want/wanted to prepare my students for an international, globalized world).
Re: question on the workshop activities. This is what the Policy Design week looked like:
- I invited Dr. Mara Sidney to give a guest lecture.
- I assigned her work alongside Anne Schneider and Helen Ingram on social construction of target populations and policy tools
That was for one of the 2 hour blocks (this class was 4 hours a week, 2 hours/day, 2 days/week).
The second 2 hour block was entirely dedicated to workshopping: doing the work of policy analysts, but inside the classroom: preparing briefing cards, reports, analyses, etc.
Some weeks, I gave them BOTH 2 hour blocks (4 hours in total) to work on a workshop policy analysis problem.
For example, this is a policy plan to solve homelessness policy. Definitely too complex to tackle in ONE 2 hour session. I give them plenty additional time if need be.
Deliverables are always "look-alike" - that is, as real as they can be. For example, this is a request for a memorandum to the President of Mexico.
This one is a CBA (Cost Benefit Analysis).
Obviously, it should be presented in a policy memo format.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I have news about online teaching and reading workload, friends.
I have experimented with REDUCING the number of readings I assign for a class. This is hard in overview courses because you always feel like they should have "the lay of the land" and master all that there is.
HOWEVER...
My students have performed BETTER with reduced reading workloads.
Undergrads focus on ONE reading per week, while having 3 more available "if they so happen to have the time to read them" (they often do try to read these extra readings).
Masters' level students have appreciated taking a "let's just take things more slowly" approach.
Doctoral level students felt somewhat weirded out that I wasn't assigning three books a week. Though they appreciated it.
What I have drawn from my experiences:
- Workshops work.
No se debe hacer investigación en ciencias sociales seleccionando primero el métodos y luego ver "qué pega". El método y la estrategia empírica vienen dictados por el tipo de pregunta de investigación.
El objetivo de la investigación en ciencia social es EXPLICAR fenómenos.
En el caso de estudios comparados, el objetivo de la investigación es explicar la VARIACIÓN.
¿Qué explica que en unos casos ocurra X y en otros ocurra Y?
Las posibles explicaciones provienen de la TEORÍA. Por eso las investigaciones ateóricas son insuficientes e inexactas.
Cuando se pretende hacer investigaciones comparadas, debemos postular las EXPECTATIVAS TEÓRICAS. Esto es fundamental ya sea que se haga comparación o no.
También es fundamental postular las EXPLICACIONES ALTERNATIVAS. Es decir, "este fenómeno lo podría explicar X, Y o Z".
1). We are in the midst of a global pandemic. Lower your expectations and communicate them to everyone around you: it's ok not to be doing as much as you would "normally" do.
Brutal, incisivo, analítico, y como siempre, esclarecedor, mi amigo @Giorgioromero en su análisis de si López Obrador realmente es verdaderamente de izquierda (fun fact: he is not).
"Muchos de los seguidores de López Obrador, como suele ocurrir tras de los hombres providenciales, no son más que oportunistas acomodados por la dirección en la que soplan los vientos"
Esto es 100% cierto. Manuel Espino y Ricardo Sheffield eran PANistas recalcitrantes hasta que
... vieron que López Obrador SÍ iba a ganar y legítimamente tenía una posibilidad de ganar (México estaba harto de las estupideces y corrupción inacabable en el PRI y en el PAN).
Y entonces, mágicamente, aparecieron Bartlett (PRIísta de cepa), y toda la horda subsecuente.
Como estoy dando Métodos de Investigación este semestre y estoy generando mis Apuntes de Clase, voy a hacer un hilo sobre cómo producir un Esqueleto de un artículo científico (o de un capítulo de la tesis, o de un capítulo de libro).
Este método ya lo describí en mi blog.
Al considerar escribir un artículo, un capítulo de libro o una ponencia para conferencia debemos reconocer que existen diferentes formatos para producir textos científicos.
Yo provengo originalmente de la ingeniería química (aunque mi doctorado sea en dos ciencias sociales: geografía humana y ciencia política), y sigo leyendo literatura académica en el área de las ciencias naturales e ingeniería, por lo que estoy muy acostumbrado al modelo IMRAD.