As an ID doc who regularly sees #COVID19 patients & is responsible for starting & discontinuing isolation, a few comments:

I understand why there’s distrust but Trump may actually no longer be infectious at this point.

Thread
(The fact that he wasn’t properly isolating before this evening is a different story.)

(2/n)
Most people are most infectious from 2 days before to 5 days after the onset of symptoms. This excellent thread by @mugecevik explains this much better than I could.

(3/n)
We err on the side of caution & typically isolate for 10-20 days, depending on the severity of illness and the immune status of the patient. These decisions are not easy and are made on a case-by-case basis. We primarily use symptom-based criteria, NOT TESTS.

(4/n)
#SARSCoV2 RNA shedding is often prolonged (for weeks) but the duration of infectious (replication-competent) virus is relatively short. The detection of viral RNA (eg, by PCR) does not necessarily indicate infectiousness.

(5/n)
I think that the CDC criteria are reasonable:
- 10-20 days have passed since symptom onset and
- At least 24 hours have passed since resolution of fever without the use of fever-reducing medications and
- Other symptoms have improved

(6/n)

cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
This CDC criteria incorporated data that are summarized here with references:

(7/n)

cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
Per CDC, it’s not 10 or 20 days but 10 to 20 days.
Whether Trump had moderate or severe disease is not entirely clear, given the limited info. It’s considered severe if a patient requires O2 support or if the O2 saturation is <94% on room air, so he may have had severe disease.8
Recommendations for discontinuing isolation are different from recommendations on when to discontinue quarantine for people who have been exposed (which is 14 days from exposure).

(9/n)
It’s tempting for people who have not been infected to insist that those w/ infection remain in isolation for longer than what is necessary, but excessively prolonged isolation has a number of consequences that impact patients’ mental health, families, & the economy,...

(10/n)
...and can lead to unnecessarily long hospitalizations, which can deplete resources (including available beds & PPE), and can increase the risk of hospital-associated complications.

End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jake Scott, MD

Jake Scott, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jakescottMD

9 Oct
Short 🧵
#COVID19 & post-acute/long-term care facilities:
-Facilities are often unfairly blamed for outbreaks
-As long as the virus continues to spread in communities it will likely make its way into these vulnerable populations, & once it gets in it’s very hard to control (1/4)
-There are specific things facilities can do to help keep infection out, like frequent testing, but resources are limited & they need much more support than they’re getting.
(2/4)
-Even if staff have proper PPE & are practicing perfect infection prevention measures, many of the residents are unable to comply w/ mask-wearing & physical distancing
(3/4)
Read 4 tweets
13 Jun
I wrote a letter to @nytimes, like many of you, after reading this problematic article, but I never heard back, so I figured I'd include it here. With thanks to: @eliowa @GermHunterMD @dan_diekema @mike_edmond nytimes.com/2020/06/01/hea…
As infectious diseases physicians, the specialists primarily responsible for controlling infection within hospitals, we strongly dispute the author’s interpretation of data referenced in the June 1st article, “Medical Workers Should Use Respirator Masks, Not Surgical Masks.”
The headline itself, phrased as an official recommendation, could cause innumerable problems. The author draws inaccurate conclusions from a study published in the Lancet, which is a review and meta-analysis that draws from 172 studies.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!