Wow! @NobelPrize in Economics goes to Paul Milgrom and Robert Wilson, whose “best-known contribution is the auction they designed the first time the US authorities [the @FCC!] sold radio frequencies to telecom operators.” Very well-deserved recognition. nobelprize.org/prizes/economi…
For years, the @FCC allocated frequencies using what were called “beauty contests.” Applicants would lobby the agency on why their proposal was superior and merited a license. Highly inefficient, no revenue to @USTreasury, and companies “spent huge amounts of money on lobbying.”
In 1959, Ronald Coase wrote a seminal paper called, appropriately, “The Federal Communications Commission.” He identified numerous flaws in the centrally-planned approach to spectrum allocation and proposed that the @FCC assign spectrum instead through auctions.
Coase’s proposal for spectrum auctions was “was treated with extreme hostility” and “mocked by communications policy experts, opposed by industry interests, and ridiculed by policy makers” who said Coase knew little about spectrum, or even economics. digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cgi/viewconten…
When Coase presented his idea to the @FCC, the reception was chilly. The first question: “Tell us, Professor Coase, is this all a big joke?” And two Commissioners deemed the odds of auctions being held equal to “those on the Easter Bunny in the Preakness.” transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases…
It took THIRTY-FOUR YEARS for the wisdom of Coase’s idea to prevail. Congress in 1993 gave the @FCC spectrum auction authority. The first auction was held in 1994.
It was Milgrom and Wilson who helped the @FCC design that auction, along with incredibly smart, talented economists on the @FCC staff like Evan Kwerel, who wrote a white paper in 1985 that gave us a blueprint for spectrum auctions and proposed broadcast incentive auction in 2002.
It’s because of this context that the @NobelPrize is so richly deserved for Milgrom and Wilson, and why credit is due all the others who labored for so long to enable the transition from a process plagued by public-choice problems to one that’s become standard around the world.
It also reinforces wisdom of incorporating sound economic analysis into the @FCC’s work. One of the structural reforms I’m proudest of is creating the Office of Economics and Analytics. Proposed @HudsonInstitute in 2017 and established in 2018, OEA opens door to new big ideas.
Postscript: this has to be one of the best stories about a @NobelPrize notification. One awardee knocks on another's door in the middle of the night with the good news!
BREAKING NEWS: The @FCC has designated #Huawei and #ZTE as companies posing a national security threat to the United States. As a result, telecom companies cannot use money from our $8.3B Universal Service Fund on equipment or services produced or provided by these suppliers. 1/5
In making this decision, @FCC took into account input from Congress, Executive Branch, intelligence community, allies, and communications service providers. Overwhelming weight of evidence supported designation of Huawei and ZTE as national security risks to U.S. networks. 2/4
Both Huawei and ZTE have close ties to the Chinese Communist Party and China’s military apparatus. And both companies are broadly subject to Chinese law, which obligates them to cooperate with the country’s intelligence services. 3/4
Pleased to announce key changes to @FCC's Rural Health Care and #ERate programs that'll make it easier for broadband providers to support #telehealth and #remotelearning. These services are more critical than ever given the #coronavirus pandemic. 1/4
Specifically, the #FCC has waived the gift rules until August 30, 2020 to enable service providers to offer, and RHC/#ERate program participants to solicit and accept, improved connections or additional equipment for #telemedicine or #remotelearning during this pandemic. 2/4
This waiver will let health care providers, schools, and libraries accept improved capacity, #WiFi hotspots, networking gear, or other equipment or services to support doctors and patients, teachers and students, and librarians and patrons during the #coronavirus outbreak. 3/4
“Quite simply, you don’t get to do business in China today without doing exactly what the Chinese government wants you to do. Period. No one is immune. No one.” — former Apple exec in @supchinanews.
#Huawei "funded a @Cambridge_Uni college study on global governance reforms in communications and technology" and a Cambridge forum, and "[t]he forum led to a white paper, published online this week, that referred favourably to Huawei."
“The action taken against [@joshchin@Chao_Deng@PhilipWen11] is an extreme and obvious attempt by the Chinese authorities to intimidate foreign news organizations by taking retribution against their China-based correspondents”—@fccchina.
China's embassy in Denmark called a cartoon "an insult to China" and demanded paper/cartoonist "publicly apologise to the Chinese people." Danish Prime Minister's response to China: "we have freedom of expression in Denmark—also to draw."
"The disclosure of his speech indicates top leaders knew about the [#coronavirus] outbreak’s potential severity at least two weeks before such dangers were made known to the public."
“Quite simply, you don’t get to do business in China today without doing exactly what the Chinese government wants you to do. Period. No one is immune. No one.” — former Apple exec in @supchinanews.
"Chinese officials arrested citizens they accused of spreading rumors about the [#coronavirus] illness online. Journalists have also reported being detained and threatened by Chinese authorities while covering the outbreak." @acollman:
"The chair of Harvard University’s chemistry department was arrested Tuesday on charges of allegedly lying to the U.S. about millions in Chinese funding he has received," misleading about "participation in China’s Thousand Talents Plan."
New regulations from China's education ministry "stipulate that authors and editors of teaching materials must 'hold a firm political stance' in line with that of the Communist Party of China." @SixthTone's @YujieXuett:
"'Für jedes chinesische Unternehmen, privat oder staatlich, gilt: Wenn die chinesische Staatsführung Druck ausübt, wird man diesem nicht standhalten können.' Ob mit oder ohne Sicherheitsgesetzgebung." @SZ:
"Chinese recipients of the [@WorldBank] loan program requested tens of thousands of dollars for the purchase of facial recognition cameras and software, night-vision cameras, and other surveillance technology for use in Xinjiang schools."