John Hayward Profile picture
12 Oct, 11 tweets, 2 min read
A great deal of the coronavirus confusion among national and global health experts, with confident pronouncements constantly modified or retracted, is because they never want to be seen endorsing the one thing that really works: travel bans, aka quarantines.
Funny how so many of the "experts" either tacitly or explicitly accept China's claims to have controlled the pandemic with amazing speed and absurdly low infection rates, but they won't talk about the biggest difference in China's approach: stern quarantines and travel bans.
China did everything it could to spread the coronavirus OUT of the country - this was obvious and quite deliberate - but they brought iron walls crashing down around cities with coronavirus outbreaks. They were literally locking sick people inside their homes.
China invested a huge amount of effort into tricking and bullying other countries into refraining from imposing the same kind of travel bans China itself was using internally. The WHO was an invaluable propaganda tool for China to accomplish this goal.
Most of the false information China relayed through the WHO was designed to make other nations underestimate the danger of the coronavirus and refrain from banning Chinese travelers. China's propagandists and diplomats furiously denounced travel bans as xenophobic.
Many Western media organizations and political figures followed China's lead, prominently including Joe Biden. But all the while, China was ruthlessly restricting internal travel from infected cities. Later it imposed travel bans on foreign nations without hesitation or apology.
The world was bullied and tricked into embracing the bizarre new practice of locking down HEALTHY people, destroying national economies in the process, instead of monitoring sick people carefully and restricting their movement, as has traditionally been the case.
This was easy to do, because the Chinese Communists know the Western world is drunk on open-borders ideology. Decades have been spent programming people to think of borders as xenophobic nationalism and travel bans as racist outrages.
To this day, none of the people involved in helping China spread the coronavirus are willing to admit they were wrong about inverting the logic of quarantines, so they just keep doubling down on stuff that doesn't work, endlessly revising confident predictions that prove false.
And we're not only failing to control the coronavirus - the places that did "everything right," including full-blown mask mania, are experiencing new waves of infection - but we're making the entire population sicker and more vulnerable, to the coronavirus and everything else.
Forcing healthy people to stay indoors was one of the worst things we could have done, but that's what we did. We were stampeded into forgetting everything we ever knew about controlling highly infectious diseases, and we'll be paying the price for a generation to come. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

14 Oct
It's funny how so many people who claim to worship "democracy" also dismiss nationalism as selfish xenophobia. Democracy is absolutely meaningless without strong national sovereignty. Under globalism, citizens of any given state have little influence over how they are governed.
Nationalism isn't just mindless tribalism. People are correct to insist their government has a responsibility TO THEM that vastly outweighs any imagined responsibility to foreign governments they have absolutely no influence over, or foreign populations.
We've seen that point taken to absurd extremes by the Left during the Trump administration, with whack-job judges ruling that foreigners have rights that EXCEED those of American citizens, including absolute rights to enter the U.S. and influence its government.
Read 13 tweets
14 Oct
The media's complaints about transparency in the Trump White House are hilarious when you consider how opaque Obama's was, and Biden's would be - with the active complicity of the media. Reporters will block damaging stories like Secret Service agents diving in front of bullets.
Given a media as thoroughly corrupt, lazy, and partisan as ours, and the immense power of the central government, no one truly concerned about in "transparency" can possibly vote Democrat. You're literally voting for the media to become PART of the administration.
There is simply no possibility of an adversarial relationship between the degenerate mainstream media and a Democrat administration, especially not after they push Biden into the White House. "Reporters" would be taking victory laps right alongside him.
Read 11 tweets
13 Oct
A Biden win would decisively hand the 21st Century to China. I think it's very important to prevent a fascist superpower from ruling the world. Funny how so many self-professed "anti-fascists" seem untroubled by the prospect.
Of course, some of the people sleeping at the wheel on China think of it as "communist," view communism as super-sized socialism, and think socialism is good. They should be thinking harder about how China demonstrates the shared DNA between socialism, communism, and fascism.
China, at any rate, is more clearly fascist than anything else. Its core structure long ago shifted to fascism - nominal private ownership of capital, but absolute control by political dictators. Chinese Marxists frequently get thrown in jail for complaining about this.
Read 23 tweets
9 Oct
Further evidence that Trump's election travails are based almost entirely on what he says, not what he's done in office. This is an astounding number given the coronavirus.
Those who think the polls are wrong will see this amazing "better off than four years ago" number as strong evidence of a hidden Trump vote that will overwhelm Biden's edge in the polls. How can people give historic high marks to Trump - better than Reagan! - but throw him out?
A related possibility is that Trump really is lagging behind, but much of his deficit against Biden is transitory anger at things he says, fueled by the relentless media campaign against him. It will dissipate and they'll vote more on the "better off than four years ago" feeling.
Read 12 tweets
9 Oct
I don't understand the need for elaborate theories that Pelosi is wasting America's time with this wackadoo 25th Amendment stuff because she's setting up some elaborate plan to replace Biden with Harris after the election.
This is what Nancy Pelosi DOES. She thinks nothing of wasting the time and money of the American people on dingbat political stunts. Remember the impeachment farce, which Dems were pulling right when the coronavirus started flaring up? Not a second thought entered her head.
If Donald Trump had raised alarms about the Rona while Dems were picking your pocket to finance Impeachment Theater, Pelosi would have howled that Trump was fearmongering about a virus to distract from the sacred and solemn impeachment hearings.
Read 8 tweets
9 Oct
Excellent analysis! One of our biggest problems is that people think "democracy," all by itself, is a sufficient check on power. I frankly don't understand how anyone can still believe that, but of course they probably won't be taught otherwise in school.
The disturbing flip side of thinking democracy is a magic talisman against tyranny is the belief that democracy sanctifies power - the essence of majoritarianism. "They can't be dictators if we can vote them out of office!" is one of the most dangerous ideas in the world.
The restraints placed on power are MORE important than the process of choosing who gets to wield it. You would be more free under a tightly restrained hereditary monarch than in a "democracy" with totalitarian centralized power.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!