The media's complaints about transparency in the Trump White House are hilarious when you consider how opaque Obama's was, and Biden's would be - with the active complicity of the media. Reporters will block damaging stories like Secret Service agents diving in front of bullets.
Given a media as thoroughly corrupt, lazy, and partisan as ours, and the immense power of the central government, no one truly concerned about in "transparency" can possibly vote Democrat. You're literally voting for the media to become PART of the administration.
There is simply no possibility of an adversarial relationship between the degenerate mainstream media and a Democrat administration, especially not after they push Biden into the White House. "Reporters" would be taking victory laps right alongside him.
The media would view its mission as helping Trump's successor succeed, "heal the country," impose "social justice," etc. There wouldn't have to be any directives issued from on high. Every DNC Media reporter and editor would feel it in their bones.
Also, remember how the media absurdly downplays actual left-wing political violence while endlessly fretting about potential "white supremacist" attacks? That's not just cynical partisan hackery. They've INTERNALIZED that fantasy worldview.
They would see their mission under a Biden administration as downplaying or completely suppressing any bad news that might set off the Deplorables. The same media that deliberately stokes left-wing racial violence would squelch anything that might set off "volatile" Trump voters.
The media would see part of its core mission as restoring "faith in government" and internationalist approval of the U.S. They'll steer wide clear of any story that might compromise that restoration of faith. They'll just find other things to talk about.
And if you want to see what industrial-strength "whataboutism" looks like, wait until you see the press dismissing every Biden blunder and scandal as a trifle compared to Whatever Trump Did. They'd still be pumping out hit pieces on Trump at the end of Biden's first term.
Remember also that a madly spinning revolving door exists between Democrat administrations and the media. Everyone in DNC Media dreams of getting tapped by a Dem president and gaining real POWER. They aren't going to write tough stories that would shatter those dreams.
Meanwhile, Democrat officials often stroll directly from their offices into jobs with the mainstream media. They have a very easy time pushing good stories and suggesting reporters avoid covering bad ones. Remember Ben Rhodes and his echo chamber full of media idiots?
You just won't have adversarial media with a Democrat administration, and it's worse now than ever before. Whatever else you expect from a Dem in the White House, it's absolutely ridiculous to think you'll get "transparency" or tough questions. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I wrote about Internet freedom a few hours before it suddenly became a massive crisis in the United States, so the post (and the Freedom House report I discussed) became an instant time capsule. The questions I asked are more urgent than ever:
"Disinformation" is treated by analysts as a menace to Internet freedom, but so are the measures employed to combat it. The worst totalitarian regimes on Earth justify Internet repression as efforts to control disinformation. We're getting a taste of that in America right now.
"Cyber sovereignty" means states like China establishing their own little Internet backwaters, ruled according to their definitions of acceptable speech, hate speech, disinformation, and sedition.
We have that too. In America, cyber sovereignty is imposed by Big Tech moguls.
It's so weird that the big social media platforms simultaneously decided to throw away their "platform, not a publisher" protection to suppress a flimsy nothingburger story that should be like the buzzing of flies to a candidate with an insurmountable lead in the polls.
It almost makes you wonder if maybe that candidate knew even worse revelations were coming, so he got in touch with his very dear friends at the social media giants and told them to crush the early releases at all costs, to shut the whole chain of stories down.
DNC Media long ago mastered the art of the soft embargo. They simply refuse to amplify stories that don't fit their precious political narratives, while the stories that DO fit get wall-to-wall coverage. They don't confront Democrats about inconvenient stories.
It's funny how so many people who claim to worship "democracy" also dismiss nationalism as selfish xenophobia. Democracy is absolutely meaningless without strong national sovereignty. Under globalism, citizens of any given state have little influence over how they are governed.
Nationalism isn't just mindless tribalism. People are correct to insist their government has a responsibility TO THEM that vastly outweighs any imagined responsibility to foreign governments they have absolutely no influence over, or foreign populations.
We've seen that point taken to absurd extremes by the Left during the Trump administration, with whack-job judges ruling that foreigners have rights that EXCEED those of American citizens, including absolute rights to enter the U.S. and influence its government.
A Biden win would decisively hand the 21st Century to China. I think it's very important to prevent a fascist superpower from ruling the world. Funny how so many self-professed "anti-fascists" seem untroubled by the prospect.
Of course, some of the people sleeping at the wheel on China think of it as "communist," view communism as super-sized socialism, and think socialism is good. They should be thinking harder about how China demonstrates the shared DNA between socialism, communism, and fascism.
China, at any rate, is more clearly fascist than anything else. Its core structure long ago shifted to fascism - nominal private ownership of capital, but absolute control by political dictators. Chinese Marxists frequently get thrown in jail for complaining about this.
A great deal of the coronavirus confusion among national and global health experts, with confident pronouncements constantly modified or retracted, is because they never want to be seen endorsing the one thing that really works: travel bans, aka quarantines.
Funny how so many of the "experts" either tacitly or explicitly accept China's claims to have controlled the pandemic with amazing speed and absurdly low infection rates, but they won't talk about the biggest difference in China's approach: stern quarantines and travel bans.
China did everything it could to spread the coronavirus OUT of the country - this was obvious and quite deliberate - but they brought iron walls crashing down around cities with coronavirus outbreaks. They were literally locking sick people inside their homes.
Further evidence that Trump's election travails are based almost entirely on what he says, not what he's done in office. This is an astounding number given the coronavirus.
Those who think the polls are wrong will see this amazing "better off than four years ago" number as strong evidence of a hidden Trump vote that will overwhelm Biden's edge in the polls. How can people give historic high marks to Trump - better than Reagan! - but throw him out?
A related possibility is that Trump really is lagging behind, but much of his deficit against Biden is transitory anger at things he says, fueled by the relentless media campaign against him. It will dissipate and they'll vote more on the "better off than four years ago" feeling.