The McConnell rule makes zero sense. When the Senate and the president are the same party there is no check whatsoever against court packing. When the Senate and the president are different parties there is an inherent built-in check in place.
Why then did McConnell completely block the nomination from even going to a hearing in 2016?

Did he not even have the votes to block her?
FYI, since 1980, three Justices were confirmed by mixed President/Senate (though not in an election year). All nominated by Republicans and confirmed by Democrats.

(Thomas and Alito, confirmed by Dems, and Breyer, confirmed by Republicans)
But again, if lame duck court packing is your concern, the rule would be against SAME party nominations/confirmations.

Because, again, when the parties are different, the voting process itself is the check against packing. The very vote that McConnell blocked in 2016.
Going back all the way to World War II there are several other Dem Senates that approved GOP nominees for SCOTUS. There are zero cases of the reverse, but I don't want to be unfair here — there was only one case where there was ever an opportunity and that was Garland.
So yes since WWII there have been five Republican Senates under Democratic Presidents, and in that time only one SCOTUS nomination ever came up.

In that same period there were eleven Democrat-led Senates under Republican Presidents, and Democrats confirmed nine Justices.
It's striking that since WWII we have only had twelve total Republican Senates (out of 40).

But in that time Republican Presidents nominated fully half of all confirmed Justices (14 of 28)*.
*I've been saying "since WWII" in this thread but I started with 1941 the term. If I only look truly post-WWII, then Republican Presidents have nominated the majority of the Justices (14 of 24).
This is an excellent point. Regardless of Senate leadership, most of the confirmations were strongly supported by the minority party too.

It's really just the last decade that things have fully turned to shit.

I know a lot of people trace this all to the Powell Memo in 1971 (and there's some truth to that), but a lot of different things had to combine to work their magic over several decades to put us here.
Things like corporate monopolization of the media; ending the fairness doctrine; the Internet (and it's corporate monopolization); and a radical right-wing underground movement that steadily gathered power.
By the way I have a huge error above that I thought I corrected but that tweet apparently didn't go out. Breyer was not confirmed by a Republican Senate. My other tweet where I said that a Republican Senate (post WWII) has confirmed zero Democrat-nominated justices is correct.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas A. Fine #TrumpIsUnfit 🇺🇸

Thomas A. Fine #TrumpIsUnfit 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thomasafine

15 Oct
So let's speculate on what really happened with this Hunter Biden propaganda. This is one possible interpretation of the facts we have on hand.

Hunter Biden drops off three laptops for repair and data recovery with Mr. Isaac in April 2019. 1/
Mr. Isaac, sympathetic to right wing conspiracy theories, thinks he may have been handed some kind of evidence and somehow contacts Rudy Giuliani.

Copies of the data are made. Emails are extracted and converted into PDF form in September and October.
Giuliani uses his FBI contacts to get one of the laptops (and a disk of unknown origin) subpoenaed by the FBI as part of some sort of investigation.

They sit on this info until three weeks before the election when they hope for maximum damage.
Read 19 tweets
14 Oct
So I just looked at CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, and FOX news website front pages.

Fox has three stories covering this propaganda email thing. Their top three stories.

None of the other networks have it on their front pages.
So for all the criticism that other major networks are falling for this nonsense, it looks like (at the moment) maybe they really aren't.
Of course the reality is that if GOP members of Congress start talking about it incessantly, major press will have to cover it. This is exactly why Russians have been successfully targeting GOP members of Congress with their propaganda.
Read 6 tweets
13 Oct
So I have some questions to ask with no agenda. I'm seeing several tweets today that "sexual preference" is an offensive term, and as a straight guy I'm a bit confused.

Wouldn't the claim that this is an offensive term itself be offensive to bi/queer people?
It would seem that saying that preference doesn't exist would be synonymous with telling bisexuals they're just confused.

And as we work to move gender away from binary descriptions, why is it either politically or scientifically beneficial to move sexuality back into a binary?
I certainly understand that the vast majority of both straight and gay people feel strongly about their attractions and have no interest in deviating, and I agree that this is most likely built in. But that doesn't seem to mean that "sexual preference" should be offensive.
Read 5 tweets
19 Aug
It's interesting that the agency that Alferova and Klyushin used in their communications related to Trump and Miss Universe, "Innovation & Development Agency", used this name in English.

It's still on Klyushin's facebook page but was recently removed from Alferova's.
(Based on a google search which seems to think that text was on that page.)
While her page used "LLC", I haven't yet found any indication that such an LLC existed.
Read 48 tweets
13 Aug
HOLY SHIT.

"From Golden Showers in a sex club in Vegas".

This is 99% guaranteed to turn out to be the ACT nightclub, during Miss USA, with Trump and Emin.

Time to interview Olivia Culpo who was also there.
THIS is the origin of the pee tape story. It was Miss USA not Miss Universe, and it was six months earlier. It WAS with Emin. Everything fits.
News sources for their attendance at this club are scant. The Las Vegas Informer article where I originally got this information has been removed.

But it's archived.
web.archive.org/web/2013062707…
Read 7 tweets
4 Aug
Masha Drokova did PR for Jeffrey Epstein???

Holy shit.
She's a Russian who moved to America and became a successful Venture Capital investor.

She was also a leader of Nashi, one of the two big Russian nationalist youth movements.

And... she famously kissed Putin.
putinskissmovie.com/about.html
Here's the entire movie. Not sure if it's a legit copy but it works at the moment.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!