…in an environment with vulnerable people all around you; people like your parents, your children, your neighbours and people like your friends...
(let’s say, a city)
[5/11]
…and you CANNOT GUARANTEE that your attention will NEVER slip for a second, only a second (in which you are more than 8 meters further down the road)…
(source of cartoon unknown)
[6/11]
…under increasingly difficult conditions to keep your attention on the world around you..
(due to increasing comfort, ever larger screens and multimedia, other occupants)
A crime that most of the time doesn’t end bad for you, fortunately…
(Cover of @SZ with German cyclists killed by negligence)
[9/11]
…but annually kills more than 1.000.000 people and maims many more: People like your parents, your children, your neighbours, people like your friends.
Cars have taken over our public space. That APPROPRIATION happens in stealth. Government responses to it seem a-political and technocratic. This hides a 1-directional process that should be highly politicised.
Case: BLOKKENWEG (Ede 🇳🇱)
[2/13]
The BLOKKENWEG parallels the train tracks between Utrecht (to the west) and Arnhem (to the east).
It links directly to an important railway crossing for traveling between Ede-South and Ede center. The street and tracks are separated by public allotments since the 1980s.
[3/13]
Built in the 1920s, it was part of a small garden-city district for workers of the ENKA factory. The houses, meant for white-collar workers, were relatively large. Originally, the street was a gravel road with a dedicated walking path.
Adapting streets to a "six-foot-city" is certainly a question of geometry & space, but also how to govern that space, how to develop capacity to deliver #humanscale networks.
3 principles explored in our latest commentary bit.ly/3h6bkWZ
Photo: @dutch_ish
Principle 1 for #humanscale streets: leverage #accessibility to meaningful destinations. Entire street networks that offer a range of mobility options need to be realized. bit.ly/3h6bkWZ
[1] Iedere schooldag vinden er in NL gemiddeld 17 verkeersongevallen plaats rondom scholen waar politie aan te pas komt.
We kunnen dat verkeersgeweld aanpakken. Maar @VeiligVerkeer hangt liever elk jaar wat spandoekjes op: "De scholen zijn weer begonnen" nrc.nl/nieuws/2020/08…
[2] We zijn gewend geraakt om systematisch verkeersgeweld te zien als onvermijdelijk gevolg van onze mobiliteit.
Dan is het logisch om mensen te leren er mee om te gaan, i.p.v. het op te lossen. Maar wat als we dat geweld op straat niet voor lief nemen? decorrespondent.nl/11507/loopt-he…
[3] Sinds de opkomst van de auto is daar strijd over geleverd: is het nieuwe geweld moreel onacceptabel of een nare statistische bijkomstigheid.
Het morele standpunt werd echter 𝘬𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘵. En zo werd het debat gedepolitiseerd.
'Who caused the accident?' is a question often used to avoid asking 'What allowed the accident to be so destructive?' (@mrendell)
Unbelievable! While car-makers are flooding our streets with increasingly lethal products, we focus our policies on disciplining 'distracted pedestrians an cyclists'.
[3] 'It is not the car that kills, but the erronous driver'
If that happens over 1.2 million times annually (20-fold if we count severe injuries) it is SYSTEMIC in its design.
Humans are fallible, so be wary of providing them with destructive tools that assume they are not.
[2] Systemic traffic violence represents the largest threat to life and limb that most people in contemporary society inflict on each other on a daily basis.
Media reports it as 'a glitch in the oiled machine'.
“The large number of road accidents is truly a kind of sacrifice to the godhead of mobility to keep the wheels of traffic moving. It is a sacrifice made unconsciously, but one for which society is apparently prepared to pay the price nonetheless.”
~Paul Virilio