1/ Building a Better Commodities Portfolio (Kay, Levine, Ooi, Pedersen)
"Investors can potentially build a better commodities portfolio that is risk-balanced across sectors and that targets a steady level of volatility through time."
2/ "Because commodities have exhibited low correlations to stocks and bonds, a portfolio comprised of all three has produced higher risk-adjusted returns than a 60/40 portfolio of stocks and bonds alone."
3/ "Commodity returns have historically shown a low correlation to other asset classes. Other common inflation protection assets – such as publicly traded REITs, natural resources equities, and TIPS – have shown far higher correlations to either stocks or nominal bonds."
4/ "During periods of positive inflation surprises, stocks and bonds have historically generated negative real returns, while commodities have performed well."
“Inflation surprise” = realized 12-month inflation minus average 12-month inflation forecast from a year prior
5/ "Using monthly returns (1990-2011), the average pair-wise correlation across ten of the most traded commodity futures was 0.22 vs. 0.62 across ten developed country equity index futures and 0.53 for G6 10-year bond futures. Diversifying across commodity sectors is valuable."
6/ The volatility-targeted, sector risk balanced, drawdown-controlled portfolio improves Sharpe ratios and drawdowns. (The Appendix, in Tweet 5, has methodology details.)
"It requires much more frequent rebalancing and allocates larger weights to less liquid contracts."
7/ High-carry and high-momentum tercile portfolios outperform low-carry and low-momentum terciles.
There may also be some benefit to modifying roll methodology to avoid paying excessive carry and getting picked off by front-runners.
8/ Related research:
Exploiting Commodity Momentum Along the Futures Curves
1/ THREAD: Magazine cover predictions, shoeshine boy tips, and other questionable calls
"On Aug 13, 1979, the front cover of Business Week featured a crumpled share certificate in the shape of a crashed paper dart: ‘The Death of Equities.‘ "
2/ "Do we really not care about looming crises (national debt, underfunded pensions/Social Security/health care, student debt), or is it that we feel shackled by our lack of understanding?
"As money continues to become a bigger part of our lives, we understand it less." (p. 2)
3/ "Not too long ago, we didn’t have the advantages the financial world now provides. For example, mortgages weren’t widely available to the general public. If you wanted to buy a house, you had to save up the entire purchase price." (p. 3)
1/ Resurrecting the Value Premium (Blitz, Hanauer)
"We use more powerful value metrics, apply basic risk management, and make more effective use of the breadth of the liquid universe of stocks and conclude that a healthy value premium is still present."
2/ "The big-cap component of HML has been flat on balance since the early 1980s.
"HML has been critically dependent on the efficacy of B/M in the small-cap space. The concern that the HML premium is seriously impaired or may even have disappeared does not seem unreasonable."
3/ "The U.S. post-publication HML value premium is less than 1% per annum with an insignificant t-stat. The big-cap HML component even displays a negative average return.
"The only significant HML performance in Developed-ex-US and Emerging Markets is in the small-cap space."
2/ "These are ideas so ingrained in the collective consciousness that it seems foolhardy to even wonder if they’re potentially untrue. Sometimes these seem like questions only a child would ask, since children aren’t paralyzed by the pressures of consensus and common sense.
3/ "When you ask smart people if there are major ideas that will be proven false, they say, “There must be. That has been experienced by every generation in history.”
"Yet offer a list of contemporary ideas that might fit, and they’ll be tempted to reject them all." (p. 2)
"Buffett doesn't have the highest annual returns: Renaissance Technologies tops that with 66% since 1988. But @morganhousel notes that Simons’ net worth is $23 billion vs. Buffett’s $81 billion. The difference: fewer years of compounding." @GuruInvestor