Today is the last day of the 2020 Census count. The Supreme Court rejected a lower court's order to extend the count after serious delays because of COVID.
This makes it easier for Trump to not count lots of people, esp minorities + tribes. This is what he's been trying to do.
This is easily the most damaging development this week outta the Trump admin.
This final stage of the census count is the only stage being cut short. It's the most crucial part for reaching "hard-to-count populations." Which largely happen to be... communities of color.
Non-English speakers + low-income people are among the hardest people to count.
They rely on census takers coming to their homes in this final stage of the count to do “nonresponse follow-ups" b/c they didn't respond via the internet, by phone or mail.
Some people in remote areas, like people on tribal reservations, have no internet. Some people move a lot and don't have landlines, which makes it harder to tie them to a mailing address.
Door-knocking is the most effective way to make sure everyone gets counted.
Because the Trump admin is ending census door-knocking early, after already losing months of time for door-knocking in the spring b/c of COVID-19, census takers simply won’t reach some of these communities at all.
“It’s clear they’re trying to manipulate the census,” Sen. Shaheen told me last month. She's the top Dem on the Senate panel charged with funding the census.
It's used to draw congressional districts. If fewer people of color are counted in a given area, for ex, they lose political representation. They lose political power. For a decade.
The census is also used to decide how much federal $ goes to every community.
For *each person* not counted, their community loses *thousands of dollars* every year. For 10 years.
That $ would have gone toward things like health care, education and infrastructure.
Tribal advocacy groups are extremely concerned about what is happening. Some reservations have no internet and are very remote. They'll just be passed over entirely.
This is very fucked up. For months, the Trump admin has been doing everything it can to end the census count early, knowing it will disproportionately leave behind minority, rural + tribal communities.
Not being counted = being weakened politically + economically. For a decade.
The Trump administration filed this "emergency application" with the Supreme Court last month to halt the census count. They won.
Congress coulda done something here. They could have passed a law extending the statutory census deadline to give the Census Bureau more time. That would've helped. But they didn't do it.
The House passed a bill to do it. The Senate did nada. So nothing changed.
If we're looking at this as a purely political power grab by the Trump admin/GOP, which it is, it's worth noting this is going to hurt rural, GOP communities too.
Some won't be counted here, either.
I don't know how it is constitutional to cut the census count short by choice.
I'm no expert, but the Constitution says everyone has to be counted.
It's not Census Bureau workers behind this. Trump's political appointees are driving this.
A Commerce Dept OIG report concluded last month:
"The decision to accelerate the Census schedule was not made by the Census Bureau."
That report was pretty damning. It also concluded:
"II. The accelerated schedule increases the risks to obtaining a complete and accurate 2020 Census."
Trump has been trying to weaken the 2020 census count for years, in ways that would hurt or intimidate minorities.
He tried to add a citizenship q. (Failed.)
He directed the govt not to count undocumented immigrants when redrawing congressional districts. (Uh, illegal.)
If Biden wins and if the Senate flips to Dem control, can they extend the count? Pass a bill to extend the statutory deadlines they will have blown past, and then authorize a supplementary count?
No idea. It feels very complicated and involves statutory changes.
I feel for all the census takers out there who have been busting ass to knock on doors and count as many hard-to-reach people as they can before time runs out. I've heard from quite a few.
If you haven't done it yet, you can do it online here if you care about your community having some political and economic power for at least the next 10 years. No biggie. 2020census.gov/en/ways-to-res…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is something rich (& infuriating) about Karen Pence trying to make mental health & suicide prevention her signature issue when she works at a school that bans LGBTQ teachers and kids.
LGB kids consider suicide at almost 3 times the rate of hetero kids, per Trevor Project.
Good morning! ☕️ Senators' time is up for Qs with Amy Coney Barrett and the Judiciary committee will vote to send her nomination to the Senate floor on Oct. 22 at 1 pm.
Also this exchange happened last night, so... yeah.
Day 3 of Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation hearing.
Dianne Feinstein opens, again, with family talk.
"I'm delighted to see your family here again. I hope they feel that very special sense of pride in you.... I was thinking of my children and grandchild."
Progressives have been fuming at Dems like Feinstein for treating this situation as business as usual.
“It’s becoming increasingly clear that Democrats are not doing enough to show that this is an illegitimate process w/ an illegitimate nominee." huffpost.com/entry/democrat…
Barrett, again, won't say whether a president can unilaterally delay an election.
Today, Senate Democrats spent hours pressing Amy Coney Barrett on health care, abortion and her potential role in a 2020 presidential election dispute.
Progressives have been urging Democrats to show a fiery, united opposition to this entire process, framing Trump’s Supreme Court pick as an illegitimate nominee in an illegitimate confirmation hearing.
“We need a bit of a reality check that this isn’t normal right now,” she said. "We shouldn’t be doing this. We should be passing coronavirus relief.” huffpost.com/entry/amy-cone…
Dianne Feinstein's first question to Amy Coney Barrett in her confirmation hearing: I was wondering if you could introduce us to your children and family.
Feinstein: Do you agree with Antonin Scalia's view that Roe v Wade was wrongly decided?
Barrett: I can't pre-commit or say, "yes, I'm going in with some agenda," because I'm not.
Back to praising Barrett on family stuff.
"You've got a lovely family. You understand all the implications of family life," said Feinstein. "I'm proud of you for that."