Today's newsletter from @TaylorPearsonMe is excellent. It's about The Farthest Down the Chain Principle.
I haven't heard it called this before, but I do know about the principles under other names: Mission Command or empowered execution.
Important ideas - time for a thread!
Let's start with OODA.
There are 2 or 3 really good intros to OODA out there that don't oversimplify, and Taylor's is one of them. It's also another OODA loop video with insanely low views for its value! (I'll share some more later on).
The OODA loop was the culmination of Boyd's synthesis of millennia of military strategy and scientific principles. It truly contains multitudes, and if you're operating in an kind of complex environment, it's required knowledge.
The paper at the end of the previous thread is a masterpiece of explanation about the building blocks of OODA. This is the other criminally neglected video I mentioned before.
Evolutionary Epistemology
I've come to think of OODA as less of a loop and more or a hierarchy...
A flow of energy/information from our external environment inwards ("up" the heirarcy).
Coupled with intent and actions flowing outwards, changing our environment which are then observed.
And so on...
Events happen, which are OBSERVED and have some effect on our model of the world (ORIENTATION). The familiarity of those events determines how far up/in the change to our models penetrates the hierarchy.
Changes in our mode determine what we DECIDE and ACT upon.
If OODA is a loop, it's a Hofstadter-esqe strange loop.
What Taylor is really talking about in the newsletter is the concept of Mission Command - what @donvandergriff calls "The doctrine of empowerment"
MC is the "outward" flow if intent. It's so important that there's a whole section in my course on it.
MC relies on mutual TRUST (Einheit) and FLEXIBILITY of thinking (Behindigkeit) with ALIGNMENT (Auftragstaktik, Commanders Intent) to build a kind of group INTUITION (Fingerspitzengefühl).
These are the building blocks of EFFECTIVENESS or FLUENCY of operation embodied by OODA.
Having effective organisational OODA loops is how you win.
Mission Command is the mechanism by which you build those loops.
So if Mission Command is how you build effectiveness on the doing side of OODA. The other "half" is how we understand our environment, how we OBSERVE and ORIENTATE.
This is Situational Awareness.
Even though a lot of the research into SA was carried out by the USAF, I haven't found much evidence that it was either influenced or known about by Boyd. @FuentesDeOnoro/@PonchAGLX do you know?
This makes the clear overlaps even more fascination. SA is exactly OO
It all comes down to AWARENESS, ALIGNMENT and ACTION
I dig into all of this in a lot more detail in my course
Potentially unpopular opinion on the tech industry.
We're already good enough at doing.
#devops, #nocode, #agile are all mainly focused on building things better and faster.
That's not the bottleneck anymore. We should switch our focus to what comes before and after
\1
What comes before?
Context and Situation - WHY are we doing this?
and after?
Learning and Improvement - how are we going to get better over time?
\2
Agile practices were born into a time where building and shipping was a lot harder and more time consuming than it is now. The tech landscape also moved much slower.
A couple of hours every two weeks is no longer the right balance between execution and reflection.
I got a @onepeloton 3 weeks ago. Since then I've used it almost every day, and seen some pretty startling results.
I've lost nearly 5kg (not been drinking this month too) and my avg power output today over 45 mins was almost equal to a 20 min max effort in wk 1 🤯
Takeaways:
I am just a complex systems like any other. I want to pull out a few observation that I think apply to intervening in any system.
1) Make change easy and engaging.
I hate running. Even in the Royal Marines when I got relatively decent at it, I never really enjoyed it. Trying to take up a running habit has been a bust!
OTOH the whole experience of using the bike draws me in.