Expert analysis of the results of making 'sex' a self-id question in the census, by @ProfAliceS, @lnmackenzie1 & @janeclarejones. We already have one example of the seriously misleading results of a survey based on self-id of sex (thread).
We compared the Stonewall School Report 2012 (data gathered by sex) with the report of 2017 (data gathered by self-id). The School Report 2017 finding that 45% of trans young people have attempted suicide, has had a huge influence on policy making. transgendertrend.com/stonewall-scho…
We calculated the number of actual females who responded to the 2017 survey, and we found an anomaly. All other general population studies show a significant increase in rates of self-harm in girls since 2012. LGBT young people, in every other study, are particularly at risk.
So we would have expected the Stonewall report to show an even larger increase in rates of suicidal ideation in girls since 2012 than general population studies. But the Stonewall report, uniquely, showed an actual drop in rates of self-harm and suicide attempts for girls.
We looked for an explanation of this atypical result, and it didn't take long to find it. The ‘male gender’ category shows a significant rate increase in all three areas of self-harm, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts since 2012.
Girls (who previously may have described themselves as lesbian or bisexual) are now swelling the ranks of the 'male gender' category. The result of the Stonewall School Report 2017 actually shows a significant increase in the rate of suicidal ideation in girls.
It's just that they are now invisible.
The way the @ONS gathers data influences other agencies. If every agency gathered data based on self-id of sex, we wouldn't know that there has been an exponential increase in the number of teenage girls being referred to the Tavistock; data would show an increase in boys.
The Tavistock referral figures 2019/20 show that for a total of 103 children aged between 11-17, their sex is recorded as 'not known'. If sex is not recorded, the Tavistock, like Stonewall, will produce seriously misleading data. The @ONS must not collude. gids.nhs.uk/number-referra…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Our schools pack is fully compatible with the new DfE guidance. First published in February 2018, it has been downloaded over 15,000 times and over 1,500 hard copies have been sent out to parents and schools. The response has been overwhelmingly positive. transgendertrend.com/product/school…
Our safeguarding concerns guide looks at examples of unsafe practice in guidance from organisations signposted by the DfE, including promising confidentiality to a child promotion of off-label drugs and erosion of consent. transgendertrend.com/product/safegu…
Our Children's Rights Impact Assessment of the Allsorts trans inclusion schools toolkit, used as the basis for transgender schools guidance by authorities across the UK, shows the impact of this guidance in relation to the UN Rights of the Child. transgendertrend.com/product/childr…
Important news: The NHS has today announced that Dr Hilary Cass OBE will lead an independent review into gender identity services for children and young people. “This review provides an opportunity to explore the most appropriate treatment and services required” - Dr Cass.
"The review will be wide-ranging in scope looking into several aspects of gender identity services, with a focus on how care can be improved for children and young people including key aspects of care such as how and when they are referred to specialist services.."
"It will also set out workforce recommendations for specialist healthcare professionals and examine the recent rise in the number of children seeking treatment."
Psychologists call for a review of @BPSOfficial guidelines promoting the affirmation approach. The BPS responds by saying they have consulted with Stonewall & the LGBT Foundation. Serious questions need to be asked about institutional policy capture. thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-33/octo…
From the excellent letter: "The BPS guidance stipulates that practitioners validate a belief in gender (both in general and in particular to the individual’s sense of self) without considering the evidence base in relation to the practice of belief validation."
"The long-term implications for this population resulting from the provision or denial of access to treatment are substantial. [...] appropriate, evidence-based guidelines are imperative to support the skilled psychological practice which our profession seeks to uphold."
From the start our aim has been to create alternative resources for schools. We believe children should not be used to further anyone's political campaign or 'prove' any ideology. See all our schools resources on this page. Thread. #CourageCalls transgendertrend.com/schools-resour…
Our schools pack (now 3rd edition) was first produced in February 2018, ahead of the planned EHRC national guidance in March - which has still not been published. On the basis of this guide our founder was shortlisted for the John Maddox Science prize. transgendertrend.com/product/school…
Next we produced our Safeguarding Concerns guide. This looked at the lobby groups promoted by the Department for Education. We outlined specific examples of advice that undermines the statutory safeguarding guidance Keeping Children Safe in Education. transgendertrend.com/product/safegu…
Adding 'gender identity' to bans on gay conversion therapy opens the door to homophobic parents who would rather have a gender-conforming, straight 'girl' than a gender non-conforming gay boy. Concerns have already been raised by ex-Tavistock clinicians. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-533395…
In 2016 we sent a letter to all the organisations who reviewed the MOU on Conversion Therapy, and to Stonewall, voicing our concerns that 'affirmation' is just a new form of gay conversion therapy & adding gender id to the MOU would put gay kids at risk. transgendertrend.com/conversion-the…
Our letter was read out at the review meeting but our concerns were ignored. Gender id was added by an activist lobby everyone was afraid to disobey. The MOU should have been reviewed after a year but never was. Why are 'LGBT' organisations not concerned? transgendertrend.com/children-left-…