Abuse and disrespect in childbirth care has been deemed a public health issue in Brazil, with many studies documenting the prevalence of discriminatory and hostile attitudes in childbirth care, both in the public and the private sectors.
Only 5.6% of Brazilian women have normal births without inappropriate & invasive (often not informed or consented to) interventions during vaginal birth, eg the unregulated use of oxytocin to induce or augment labour, Kristeller manoeuvre, forceps & episiotomy.
A 6-month evidence implementation project was undertaken to improve intrapartum care to improve mothers' experiences of childbirth.
Using the JBI Getting Research into Practice (#GRiP) approach and the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) audit and feedback tool, a baseline clinical audit measured the following 20 JBI evidence-based audit criteria for best-practice intrapartum care
The #GRiP phase identified the need i) to conduct in-service training for maintaining accurate nursing records for intrapartum care, reducing interventionist practices and establishing debriefing as a practice;
ii) to establish a Game of Values to enable positive reinforcement of service practices and highlight effective communication and respectful maternal care; and iii) for educational pamphlets to improve communication channels for women’s feedback on care.
The follow-up audit demonstrated an improvement in 10 criteria. Most notably, the use of the partograph during labour increased by 20%, compliance with women not being offered routine amniotomy or oxytocin increased by 39%, women being offered pain relief increased by 40%,
In addition, mothers and babies being given skin-to-skin contact increased by 21%. Moreover, five of the six criteria that achieved 100% compliance in the baseline audit maintained their score.
From evidence to impact: Post-exposure prophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin. Read thread 👇 for key points from the #EvidencetoImpact story in celebration of #WorldEBHCDay!
#Leprosy is a neglected tropical disease present in more than 120 countries, with a greater burden in India and Brazil. Currently, there are over 200,000 cases registered worldwide.
In 2014, the team’s proposal for a systematic review on single-dose rifampicin (SDR) as a post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) strategy for leprosy contacts received financial support from the Brazilian Ministry of Health.
Read thread👇 for key points from the #EvidencetoImpact 'Blood donor selection at the Belgian Red Cross: From evidence into policy' as we celebrate #WorldEBHCDay today! @IFRC_Europe
Patients in need of blood products are entitled to an adequate supply of safe blood. Belgian Red Cross uses a blood donor eligibility questionnaire, asking for the donor’s health and possible risk behaviour, in order to guarantee safety of both the donor and recipient.
Blood donor selection via the blood donor eligibility questionnaire remains an important part in the safety of blood supply globally.
Cochrane First Aid repackages Cochrane evidence into easy-to-use formats such as blogshots (a simple one-page summary) and disseminating them via social media.
This is because 'Health information should not be restricted to healthcare professionals, but needs to be accessible and comprehensible in languages that people understand' - Cochrane Translator.
Read thread👇for key points from an #EvidencetoImpact story from Tabriz for #WorldEBHCDay, ‘Promoting informed consent in a children’s hospital’
Informed consent is considered a continuous & dynamic process, and it becomes complex in paediatric clinical practice, where parents must make decisions for their children.
The aim of the evidence implementation project was to evaluate current practice and implement best practice related to promoting informed consent in nursing and medical procedures, as well as surgical consent in the paediatric hospital.
In 2016 the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group (TAG) began an in-depth prioritisation project based on the @JamesLindAlliance framework to ensure that its efforts are aligned with stakeholder information needs.
TAG wanted to ensure that the voices of researchers, commissioners, funders and policymakers were heard, as well as those of healthcare providers and users.