Few to none do what you just did there...you show the Japanese side with naval combatants & transports of less than 1,000 tons.
MacArthur Reports has a few such maps.
US Naval historians would rather slit their...
@DWB55 ...wrists in a long warm bath before consulting that resource and almost none have looked at the Japanese & Australian small ships and barges role in the New Guinea campaign.
Doing so is not career enhancing for what it reveals about the WW2 USN narrative.
@DWB55 When you compare your map to this one. You get the air-sea-land context of the Japanese projecting power and guarding sea lines of communication.
Here we are at over 75 years since these combats and it's only now such maps are made?
@DWB55 FYI, these are the MacArthur Reports maps the US Naval historians don't go near and the blog post at the link are where I give some of the reasons why.
@LarrySchweikart@GoroOuter If Sir Henry Phelps Brown & Sheila Hopkins did not address the massive shift in industrialization by electrification covering 1920 - 1965 they have a methodological problem.
The shift from line shaft & belt mechanical power transmission to electrical had huge productivity plus.
@LarrySchweikart@GoroOuter The widespread use of electric motors small enough to be connected directly to each piece of machinery meant any location with a concrete slab and electrical connections could be a factory.
It also made factories built post 1920 both easier to relocate and harder to destroy.
@LarrySchweikart@GoroOuter This is why the Soviet Union could relocate it's factories during the German invasion of 1941.
It is also why strategic bombing of German factories did not degrade production like pre-war air power theorists expected.
@downix@RupprechtDeino Structural carry modifications to the missile frame would be where the cost in the SM-6 upgrade would live.
However, compared to the new AIM-260 rocket ramjet design. An air-launched SM-6 would be longer ranged & have a much bigger installed base to work from upon introduction.
@downix@RupprechtDeino Vibration hardening from carrier launch & air carriage is another one of those "not easy" issues.
The AIM-120's carriage on F-16 wing tip hard points in the 1990's & 2000's in the various no-fly zones killed a generation of Slammer war shot dead, dead, dead.
@downix@RupprechtDeino Needs must when the devil drives. The SM-6 needs the delta vee a SM-3's 21 inch diameter booster can provide to get on a reciprocal trajectory for an HGV.
Granted, you are going to need ablative coating for the upper atmosphere as opposed to exoatmosphere flight.
Also granted
@downix@RupprechtDeino ... you are going to have issues with ionization for the radar at high supersonic speed requiring a back up sensor.
And likely the SM-6 stage atop the SM-3 booster will need a AMRAAM type multiple pulse solid rocket motor modification for the HGV intercept profile.
@downix@RupprechtDeino Raytheon's corporate engineering culture is capable of these sorts of modifications rapidly because they have had a stable and long experienced engineering team for the Standard missile that almost no other defense contractor in the world can match.