tw: misogyny, discrimination, harassment in academia

A thread about my observations from academic and other contexts. I've felt compelled to write this after realising how the deliberate framing of these issues prevents any change in the status quo, and perpetuates injustice.
As women, many of us face misogyny in our workplaces, and in society on a daily basis. Here, misogyny is defined not as hatred of women, but rather structural patriarchal norms that have certain expectations from women & penalise those who break these, or speak out against these.
Of course, discrimination is intersectional, with ethnic minority women likely to fare worse in these systems. Much like with racism, experiences of women are often shaped by daily micro-aggressions - including a dismissal of their expertise, their discomfort, and their feelings.
Imagine being questioned about your ability and qualifications every day. Imagine being talked over by people less qualified than you constantly. Imagine the constant expectation that you should be modest, while men around you are praised for talking about their achievements.
Now, coming to my primary point. Remember, that women’s & ethnic minority academics’ experiences are often quite different from those with relative privilege. The problem is that when they call these out as misogyny/racism, they are often dismissed for lack of evidence of intent
Micro-aggressions are often dismissed as 'misunderstandings' or 'miscommunication' as the person who engaged in this denies any intent.

The idea is that if you can't prove someone wouldn't have behaved the same way with a white man, how can you possibly claim discrimination.
The idea of intent really centres the perpetrator, rather than the victim. As someone who faces this almost on a daily basis, I cannot possibly prove that each individual action would be different were I a white man. Yet, I know that the breadth of my experience is very different
Why is my discomfort, or my experience not centred or important in this narrative? Whether there is intent or not, if someone made a statement that was inappropriate, & furthers the structural misogyny that is widely prevalent in academia, why is that not enough?
In addition to dealing with constantly being undermined, we are further traumatised by our very real experiences being constantly questioned and dismissed. We're asked to then sympathise with the men who subject us to this, as they are 'hurt' by their actions being 'misunderstood
I see this even when women report sexual harassment in the academic setting. Investigations are wholly centred on men & the idea of 'intent'. 'He was just being friendly', 'he didn't mean it'. Does it matter?
He did something inappropriate. He made someone feel very uncomfortable
Can we please believe women, & ethnic minorities when they talk about their experiences? Yes, their experiences may be different to yours. Just because your daily experience doesn't align with this, doesn't mean that misogyny and racism don't exist in your environment.
And please don't say 'but how do you know he wouldn't have said this to a man?'. We shouldn't need to prove an impossible counter-factual scenario for our pain to be recognised and validated. If you want to know why women don't speak up about this, this is why.
We know that calling out misogyny begets misogyny. And we're so exhausted with dealing with it day to day, that the idea of then having to justify our very real pain to those who are blind to it is unbearable. And inevitably leads us to being considered 'troublemakers'.
How can you help? Please believe women. Validate their experiences, and be an ally. Consider that your experiences may not reflect those of others.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Deepti Gurdasani

Deepti Gurdasani Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dgurdasani1

22 Oct
A thread on where we are with the COVID-19 pandemic in England, and what we need to do urgently based on current evidence. This thread also explores why the govt Tier 1-3 strategy is nothing but a distraction from the actual public health response needed. 1/N
As we know, the PHE data shows an exponential increase in daily confirmed cases of COVID-19. We are currently seeing between 25-30K daily cases. This is likely an underestimate as testing capacity has been reached. Moreover, increases are occurring across all of England. 2/N ImageImage
Predictably increase in case numbers have translated over time into increasing hospitalisations across all of England, with regions in the North likely to hit NHS capacity soon if we don't act. While increases in the South appear slower, these are only lagging 3-4 wks behind. 3/N ImageImage
Read 22 tweets
6 Oct
Another declaration on 'herd immunity' signed by Sunetra Gupta(Oxford), Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford) & Martin Kulldorff(Harvard) who don't have a single peer reviewed publication on covid-19 epidemiology between them

Can we stop platforming pseudoscience?

theguardian.com/world/2020/oct…
And these are not experts, or researchers who have provided any evidence to support their damaging views. If you want experts, there are so many around - who are basing their views on the actual evidence. There is zero evidence to support a 'herd immunity' based strategy.
@iansample - while I appreciate comments from actual experts like @trishgreenhalgh and @BillHanage are included, the way the piece is set seems to suggest these are equally valid opinions from equals in a field. This couldn't be further from the truth.
Read 5 tweets
24 Aug
Given the recent public statements by several govt advisors regarding opening of schools, here's a thread on evidence around COVID in children:

The govt (& UK scientific 'experts') have recently cited findings from the recent PHE study as suggesting school openings are safe 1/N
The study does not in fact show this at all. It essentially collates data on results from test & trace during the period when schools were opened in June - when only ~7% of students attended. There are several key limitations of this work:
1. Given the attendance was a fraction of normal attendance, we cannot possibly extrapolate what this will mean for when schools fully open from this study. 3/N
Read 21 tweets
30 Jun
This is exactly the problem. Not only is pillar 2 data not available publicly, it's also not available to local authorities, making it impossible to identify what's causing this outbreak, or even where it is spatially. 1/N
Outsourcing testing to private companies has meant that surveillance data aren't joined up centrally. This means that:
1. There's a significant delay in identifying outbreaks- as we saw in Leicester
2. When these are identified, we have no idea of where clusters of infection are
We're essentially trying to put out localised fires we can't see by using general lockdown measures. The whole point of test, trace and isolate was to be able to identify local outbreaks and take focused measures to contain them.
Read 10 tweets
28 May
After having over three months to prepare, the government test & trace strategy appears really poorly thought out. Here's a thread about the gaps between a successful test, trace & isolate strategy and what the govt appears to be doing.

theguardian.com/world/2020/may…
1. The success of test, trace & isolate is firstly dependent on the turnover time of testing- ideally this should be less than 1 day. It is very unclear what the actual testing capacity in the UK actually is, as stats around this are deliberately opaque.
theguardian.com/world/2020/may…
2. It's dependent on the ability to trace contacts. This is not a simple endeavour- it needs public health expertise, and experience with local communities, as well as trust. It makes no sense that the govt has outsourced this to commercial companies that lack any expertise.
Read 18 tweets
16 May
A brief thread about why this is a dangerous time to be opening schools in the UK - and why the narratives around this being reasonable just because R is below 1 don't make sense.
As of yesterday, the govt reported 384 deaths from COVID-19. R determines the slope of decline or increase in cases & therefore, deaths from this point. If the R is above 1, we see exponential rises. The level to which R falls below 1 determines the gradient or speed of decline.
While we are seeing daily decline in deaths within the UK, this has been gradual. At this point, the government policy should be to reduce R as far as possible to bring the number of new cases down to very low levels. Why does this matter?
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!