Folks, I'm on a real bender of reading up on colonial-era India (don't judge; this is just how historians are). My recent and current reading lists include:
Durba Mitra's Indian Sex Life: Sexuality and the Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought amazon.com/Indian-Sex-Lif…
Debjani Bhattacharyya's Empire and Ecology in the Bengal Delta: The Making of Calcutta amazon.com/Empire-Ecology…
Sheetal Chhabria's Making the Modern Slum: The Power of Capital in Colonial Bombay amazon.com/Making-Modern-…
Nayanika Mathur's Paper Tiger: Law, Bureaucracy and the Developmental State in Himalayan India (also, her Crooked Cats when it comes out) amazon.com/Paper-Tiger-Bu…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To suspend this professor is a horrifying example of Western hegemony, cultural ignorance, and anti-Chinese bias.
@USC -- There are words in lots of languages that sound off to English speakers. Learning and overcoming one's own biases are part of learning a foreign language.
I once had an English-only American tell me that Pakistan should change the name of Lahore, to avoid confusion in English. No joke. I responded: "Maybe you should learn Urdu."
Sikh. As in, imagine in an intro to South Asia course, "The person you see on this slide is Sikh."
Note that there is a clear difference between the Indian term (in many languages) "Sikh" and English "sick", but English-only speakers usually cannot hear the difference.
A few follow-ups, largely for the benefit of @BloomsburyIndia. They should see what they are doing with an unvarnished gaze.
Many observers and scholars consider the Delhi riots a pogrom, i.e., an organized massacre of an ethnic or religious group. In this case, Muslims.
During the 2020 Delhi riots / pogrom, Hindu right-wingers targeted Muslims with violence.
This wasn't a debate; it wasn't a clash about which reasonable people can disagree. One group tried to massacre members of another, and succeeded in taking dozens of lives.
A few points of clarification, especially for those not super familiar with US law and culture—
In the US, you have freedom of speech, but no right to a platform. Supremacist groups are free to articulate offensive views, but no company must give them advertising space.
Most Americans still know nothing about Hindutva. But one way of thinking about this issue in the US is as follows:
Would you platform white supremacists?
If yes, then give Hindutva ideologues airtime. But if not, then steer clear of hateful Hindutva.
The Babri Masjid was probably built in 1528 by a general of Babur. At the time, it likely wasn’t a big deal. Babur doesn’t even mention it in his memoirs.
Babri Masjid may have been built over temple ruins, but, owing to bad and politicised archaeology, we aren’t sure.
If it was built on temple ruins, they could be Jain, Hindu, or Buddhist in origin. They also could’ve been ruins for hundreds of years by the 1520s (or not).
Basics -- The #Mahabharata is an epic narrative that centers around two sets of cousins who both want a specific throne in northern India and fight over it in a cataclysmic war, with lots of side stories thrown it.
It was first written down in Sanskrit ~2,000 years ago.
When asking questions about historicity, whether something is true, some basics-
Onus is on proving it is true, not that it is false.
The answer doesn't have to be either-or; it can be fuzzy.
Historians care about beliefs & myth because they tell us what people think and value
I am now finding people on my timeline who are apologists for anti-Muslim sentiments and violence in India and, separately, people who are apologists for curbs on religious freedom in places like the UAE. A brief reminder, folks, on some basics of freedom of religion --
People should be free to practice any religion they so wish, without fear of negative consequences, much less violence.
You wanna practice the religion you were born into? Great. You wanna follow a different religion? Go for it.
This right is for all, no matter their religion.
All religious groups should have equal access to where to build their places of worship.
So, most places have zoning laws, and that's fine so long as they are applied equally. But barring Hindu temples except in one area = not religious freedom. Mobs tearing down mosques = ditto