I’m going to try explaining this again. $TSLA value can be calculated using a present value (PV) framework. Inputs:
Curr Yr EPS
EPS growth next 5 yrs
Div payout (if any)
10yr Treas yld
Equity risk prem (ERP)
Beta
Steady state P/E 5 yrs out based on proj EPS growth after Yr 5.
2/ I estimate $TSLA value using a 5-yr PV framework. Others use 10 or even 20 years. TSLA’s PT is the price at which I expect TSLA to trade in 6-12 mo. Mathematically, the PT is the PV of all dividends, plus the future price of TSLA in 5 yrs, disctd back at TSLA’s cost of equity.
3/ $TSLA pays no dividends, so all value is in the 2025 stock price, which is based on the P/E in 5 yrs, mult by the proj earnings in 5 years.The discount rate is the risk-free rate (10yr Treas yld), plus a risk premium equal to the mkt equity risk premium (ERP) ~6% x TSLA beta.
4/ My $TSLA PT is $600, based on a 2025 EPS of $18 @ 50x P/E at 2024 YE, based on proj 2025-30 EPS growth of 25% (2x PEG). My 2024 YE price of $900 is disct’d at 9.5% for 4.25 years (Oct 2020 to Dec 2024). The 9.5% rate is 10yr Treas yld of 0.8%, plus 6% ERP x TSLA beta of 1.45x.
5/ When $TSLA beats Street EPS ests, TSLA stock increases because future earnings may get revised upward, and P/Es get repriced higher if markets assume the acceleration in growth will persist. Non-recurring items (e.g., one time tax credits, legal settlements) get excluded.
6/ $TSLA often rises before earnings if investors expect delivery growth, price increases, or margin expansion will exceed Street expectations. Delivs are a function of global SAAR, EV penetrat’n and TSLA’s EV share. Investors who buy in front of earnings often sell on the news.
7/ To determine if $TSLA is cheap, one compares price to present value. If price is well below PV, a stock is viewed as cheap. Some analysts use P/Es as shorthand to assess cheapness. Normally they look at P/E vs future 5-yr EPS growth. PEGs <2x are usually considered cheap.
8/ Three conditions can cause P/Es to go higher (multiple expansion):
- Higher future vol/rev/earnings growth, usually because TAM expands or mkt share increases
- Lower int rates
- Lower beta
$TSLA stock increase most when earnings ests increase and P/Es expand simultaneously
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To understand why $TSLA rises or falls, it’s best to use a present value (PV) framework.
PV is based on Yr1 EPS, growth over next n years, dividends, 10yr Treas yld, equity risk prem (ERP), beta, and a “steady state” P/E at which a stock trades n yrs out, based on future growth.
2/ For growth stocks, it’s best to take earnings out a few years to compare P/Es, and P/Es should be measured vs exp growth (PEGs).
3/ When a company like $TSLA beats earnings ests, it rises because future earnings often get revised upward, and P/Es can be repriced if markets assume the acceleration in growth persists. Non-recurring items (e.g., one time tax credits, legal settlements) are normally excluded.
As a growth mgr, I look for three ways to generate alpha (excess risk-adj returns): 1/ Acceleration 2/ Catalysts 3/ Non-consensus bets
Some pms say finding stocks that trade at less than intrinsic value generates alpha, but absent one of the above, stocks can stay cheap forever.
2/Acceleration - If the market concludes that a 20% grower will now grow at 30% because of a new product, tech breakthrough or TAM expansion, the market will re-rate (increase the P/E of) the 20% grower to that of a 30% grower, and investors get both P/E expansion and higher EPS.
3/ Catalysts - Generally vols, earnings, new products, corp events like stock splits, M&A/buyouts, S&P inclusion, new govt policy, etc. These events don’t always add value, but often shine a spotlight on the difference between price (what you pay) and value (what it’s worth).
1/ Alpha is excess risk-adj return. If the market is +5%, and you own a stock with beta 1.2x (20% more vol than avg), any return above 6% (1.2 x 5%) is alpha. How MM are judged.
2/ Re-rating occurs when the growth rate of a company changes, which changes the P/E multiple. A company that was growing Revs at 10% is now growing Revs at 15% because of a new product or expanded TAM would get re-rated higher (investors would attach a higher P/E to earnings).
3/ Price targets are an analysts’ expectation of where a stock will trade in 6-12 months. That differs from an analyst’s assessment of a stock’s future value e.g.,2025. The 2025 value gets discounted back at a cost of equity. PTs change as the underlying fundamentals change.
Raising $TSLA PT to $2,350 to reflect 5:1 stock split, S&P inclusion, surging industry EV penetration, and TSLA share rise from 0.6% now to 4% by 2025. By 2025, w/ 20% EV penetration and 20% TSLA EV share, 3.2M delivs and $70 EPS. At 50x P/E ~$750B MktCap~$3,500/sh ~ PV $2,350.
2/ Biggest changes: $TSLA EV share now 20% (was 17%) and 9.5% cost of equity (was 10%) with S&P inclusion. TSLA 1H 2020 EV share 22% vs 2019 17%. TSLA vol growth accelerating: 2020/2H Vol up 60%+ vs 2019/2H Vols. 2021/2H CyTrck/Semi launches will cause 2021-22 EPS to crush est.
3/ $TSLA S&P 500 and 100 inclusions likely soon after 8/31 stock split, in front of 9/22 Battery Day. 3Q Vols and EPS will again surprise, sparking another round of higher ests and PTs. TSLA 90bp float-adj weight in S&P 500 will fuel $40B in TSLA buying (17% float) over 5 days.
$TSLAQ ‘s core short thesis is there is insufficient TAM to justify TSLA’s $170B valuation - a thesis I’m about to shoot holes in. They argue only a small % of global SAAR of 85MM and US SAAR of 17MM veh. are priced >$45K. So, $TSLA ‘s $170B valuation would require >100% of TAM.
..First, the avg. US light vehicle price in 2019 was $39K; by 2024 avg will be $45K. $TSLAQ doesn’t accept the $39K ASP since it incl. SUVs (only 8% SOM), pickups (18% SOM), and CUVs (41% SOM). With the Y, $TSLA now competes in ALL segments, and TSLA TAM has effectively TRIPLED!
...Second, with Gates, Fink, and now Bezos getting on the climate change bandwagon, US EV penetration is about to go through the roof; govts everywhere will offer tax credits/deductions to stimulate EV purchases, which will bring down net prices and increase TAM. $TSLA $TSLAQ