Today, I spoke at the W3C improving web advertising business group about the economics of digital ad identity. Thread🧵 on some takeaways on the future of digital ads. 1/
Cross-site identity (via cookies) allows for behavioral targeting. Importantly, identity allows for less sexy but *critical* functions like ad frequency capping, ad effectiveness measurement & attribution—all at scale. 2/
What is the value of cookies? In the status quo, most studies and data agree that cookies create value: ads get 50-70% less revenue without cookies. 3/
What does advertising look like without cookies? Ad spending will fall by *less* than 50-70%, because the market will adjust. But, the ad revenue pie will shrink, and will be divided more unequally. 4/
Analogy: What happened to my industry (post-secondary education) when we offered a worse product (Zoom/hybrid)? Our industry's revenue pie shrunk, Harvard is fine, & the lower-end is haemorrhaging. 5/
Post-cookies, digital ads have four tentpoles. Value of identity advantages the walled gardens & sign-in (i.e. hashed email identifier solutions). Context will struggle to compete: especially general & news content as well as small sites. 6/
How can privacy & modern advertising coexist? Good news: Advertisers care about audiences not individuals. Bad news: Privacy implies some hard tradeoffs. 7/
What are "the birds"? Various proposals (notably by Google Chrome’s Privacy Sandbox, Criteo) try to preserve the value of ads for the open web while protecting user privacy. This is the difficult, but important work of this W3C group. 8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Garrett Johnson

Garrett Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garjoh_canuck

21 Apr
🔥👿🔥 New working paper alert! 🔥👿🔥
"Inferno: A guide to field experiments in online display advertising"
ssrn.com/abstract=35813…

THREAD: This guide reviews challenges & solutions from a decade of research.
#marketingacad #econtwitter #fieldexperiments Image
“Abandon all hope, ye who enter here” - Dante’s Inferno👿
Online display ad experiments are hell. They are also a proving ground for field experimenters, & have much to teach us. The guide is organized into the nine 9 circles of 🔥hell🔥 as applied to #displayad #fieldexperiments Image
🔥Circle 1🔥 Display ad effects are so small🤏 that observational methods fail🤦‍♀️. Ad effects explain so little variation in ad outcomes, that they get swamped🌊 by unobserved confounds. Like Dante entering the inferno👿, we resign ourselves to the necessity of experiments.😭😭 Image
Read 11 tweets
12 Nov 19
The @guardian featured an opinion piece about how the #GDPR is failing to protect privacy.
The piece serves as an unintentional object lesson of the same. THREAD 1/
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Here is the excerpt where the author decries prevailing opt-out practices alongside the Guardian’s consent menu doing the same.
Note: The @ICOnews states that this menu is not #GDPR compliant (“NO" should be as easy as "YES"). 2/
When I VPN as a French user The Guardian interacts with 42 third party domains (listed below) and loads 122 third party cookies.
Note: All this arises without my opt-in consent. 3/
Read 7 tweets
28 Aug 19
Google just released a more details about the study showing *publisher revenue* falls 52% without a cookie. They run an experiment disabling cookies for a random sample of users on Google Ad Manager's top 500 publishers in terms of programmatic revenue. 1/
services.google.com/fh/files/misc/…
Now, we see that results vary by publisher (below). While the average publisher’s revenue falls by 52%, the median is 64%. Very few publishers see a loss less than 20% while a large number experience losses exceeding 70% (!). 2/
Despite precise aggregate estimates (95% CI <1%), the individual site estimates are statistically imprecise for smaller sites. Focusing on the top 200 sites reveals less dispersion. Now, only a 1 of 200 sites loses less than 10% of revenue. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!