Delhi High Court will shortly begin the hearing in the case concerning CBI's leave to appeal in the 2G spectrum case.

The matter will be heard by a Single Judge Bench of Justice Brijesh Sethi.

#DelhiHighCourt #2GAppeal #2GSpectrum #2GCase
Single Judge Bench assembles.
Advocate Vijay Aggarwal is the first to address the Court.

Aggarwal first gives a glimpse of the prayer sought in the petition placed for hearing before the Court today.

#DelhiHighCourt #2GAppeal #2G
Petition seeks quashing of a communication dated 17/1/2018 of the DoPT alleging that the appeal filed by CBI is done so by a person without the authority of the law.

#DelhiHighCourt #2G #2GAppeal
Aggarwal: My Lord will have to forget that My Lord is sitting in appeal under S.378 jurisdiction. My Lord is a civil court where I have come with a writ petition.
Aggarwal: My point is whether the decision to appeal against me is an executive decision and I say the discretion is not exercised properly.

My Lord will look at the decision making process and how it is relevant in the appeal
Aggarwal: Leave to appeal is the semi final we are playing.

And appeal is the final which we don't want to play.

Prosecution was to play a quarter final also and for that we have come before you.
Aggarwal: If there is an acquittal, there has to be ana analysis on three counts. There are three agencies
- Investigative
- Prosecution
- Judge
Aggarwal: Reason for acquittal can be:
- Either investigation was faulty
- Prosecution failed to secure conviction, could be strategy also
- Judgement can be wrong if it is perverse, law applied and found acquittal was necessary etc.
Aggarwal: To appeal, Judgement has to be analysed and pre-screening has to be done before filing appeal.

Here the pre-screening was not done.

CBI manual says how a Judgment can be analysed and they have not done that. That is my point.
Aggarwal: I'm here challenging the filing of the appeal itself.

Today under A.226 petition, I'm saying that the decision to file the appeal itself is wrong.
Aggarwal: There are five categories because of which acquittal is given.

Appeal can be filed only under one category of cases where the judgment is perverse.

I'm in a way helping Court to clear its docket.
Aggarwal: In this writ petition itself, the Court should also lay down the guidelines which are required to be framed.

The court has to look at it that appeals against acquittal judgements don't come to High Court in all case but infact come only when the judgment is perverse.
Aggarwal: Various portions of the judgement say that the Judge was acquitting the accused because of the flaws in the Prosecution.
Aggarwal: There is an interim application in my petition.

Prayer is, they must supply copy of complete file of the process of communication.

My Lord must first call for these documents and then examine this Writ petition.
Aggarwal: Once I was acquitted, I got a vested right and this right cannot be taken away.

#DelhiHighCourt #2G #2GAppeal #2GSpectrum
Aggarwal: Powers of the High Court under Article 226 are wider than the powers of the Supreme Court under Article 32.

A. 32 stops at fundamental rights but A. 226 is for fundamental rights and other things also.
Aggarwal says that the relevant factors that are required to be taken into consideration and analysed before deciding to appeal against acquittal are enshrined in the CBI manual and Delhi High Court rules as well and these factors were not considered by the CBI.
Aggarwal: More often than not, in special CBI Court, prosecutors argue that CBI manual is not required to be mandatorily followed... But there are SC judgments which say that in case of conflict between CBI manual and CrPC, CBI manual has to be followed in CBI cases.
Aggarwal: In acquittal cases, Ministry of Law and Justice has to opine that the judgement is perverse and there was no fault of the investigation and only then appeal can be filed.

#DelhiHighCourt #2G #2GAppeal
Hearing in the case will continue on November 2 when Aggarwal will resume his arguments.

Hearing concludes for today.
2G Spectrum: CBI and ED appeal against acquittal of accused [LIVE UPDATES from Delhi High Court]

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

24 Oct
Karnataka HC will today pass its verdict in a batch of pleas challenging the winding up of 6 debt Schemes of Franklin Templeton.

@RBI
@SEBI_India Image
The petitions challenging the winding up of debt schemes were transferred from the Delhi High Court, the Gujarat High Court, and the Madras High Court.

@RBI
@SEBI_India
The Court had began hearing the submissions of parties from August 12 and closed the hearing on September 24.
Read 16 tweets
23 Oct
News Broadcasting Standards Authority directs Aaj Tak to air apology on October 27 at 8 PM, in its order on complaint regarding fake tweets telecast relating to actor Sushant Singh Rajput. Fine of one lakh imposed on the channel.

#NBSA #SushantSinghRajput
@aajtak #mediatrial Image
Complaint was filed by film producer Nilesh Navlakha @nileshnavalakha represented by Advocates Rajesh Inamdar and Shashwat Anand
@anandshashwat
@rajinamdar22

#SSRCase
#SushantJusticeNow
NBSA has also directed other news channels including ABP News, India TV and News 24 to air apologies in relation to sensational and insensitive reporting of Sushant Singh Rajput death.

@ABPNews @News24 @indiatvnews #NBSA #SushantSinghRajputcase
Read 7 tweets
23 Oct
Nothing except bald statements of witness: Delhi High Court grants bail to riots accused in UAPA case

#DelhiRiots
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Faizan Khan was arrested by Delhi Police in the case pertaining to the conspiracy that led to the riots in the capital’s North-East area in February 2020.
#DelhiRiots Image
The specific allegation against Faizan was that he activated the SIM card while working as the authorized Airtel representative at a store called Golden Communication. #DelhiRiots
Read 4 tweets
23 Oct
Mumbai Police registers FIR against the editorial team of Republic TV for allegedly defaming Mumbai Police, trying to cause"disaffection" among members of police force.

@republic
@Republic_Bharat
@MumbaiPolice
@CPMumbaiPolice
#ArnabGoswami Image
On complaint of Police officer Shashikant Pawan, NM Joshi Marg PS has registered case u/s 3(1) Police (Incitement to Disaffection) Act 1922, Sec. 500, 34 IPC against Sagarika Mitra Dy News Editor, Shivani Gupta Anchor/Sr Associate Editor, Shawan Sen &
Niranjan Narayanswamy
The FIR is also against the Editorial staff and Newsroom Incharge for the concerned report getting aired and others.

FIR says accused by airing the concerned report have commited offences amounting to incitement to disaffection among members of the Police Force and defamed it
Read 5 tweets
23 Oct
Assault against YouTuber: Kerala High Court is hearing the anticipatory bail applications preferred by Malayalam Film Industry dubbing artist Bhagyalakshmi and two others, Diya Sana and Sreelakshmi Arackal in a case registered for assaulting YouTuber Vijay P Nair. ImageImage
The YouTuber had made sexist and offensive remarks against the women. The women rushed to Nair’s office and poured black oil on his face for his vulgar remarks against one of the women and against ‘feminists’ generally. The assault was streamed live on Facebook.
Before leaving, they took his laptop and left.
Their earlier bail plea before a Thiruvanathapuram Sessions Court was rejected by a Court which stated that no one could take the law into their own hands.
Read 19 tweets
23 Oct
Gold Smuggling Case: : Kerala High Court extends interim protection against arrest to suspended Kerala CMO Bureaucrat M. Sivasankar, reserves orders in the case.
Sivasankar approached the Court apprehending arrest in the investigations launched against him by the Customs and ed
Appearing for Sivasankar, Senior Vijayabhanu submitted that the allegations as were made out were vague and were based on likelihoods.
The Customs and ED on the other hand stated that he was not made an accused yet, and granting him anticipatory bail at this stage would hamper the investigations, considering his influence and status.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!