Boom du jour:
Tony Bobulinski, Hunter and Joe’s biz confirmed last night: the former vice president was a willing and eager participant in a family scheme to make millions of dollars by partnering with a shady Chinese Communist firm.

nypost.com/2020/10/22/hun…
Splain how Joe survives a turncoat business partner who *confirms* Joe allegedly used his office to make millions.
He says Biden was indeed “the Big Guy.”

Maybe Biden survives, but it’s not looking good for his re-election chances. C’mon, man!
Pix for posterity ImageImageImageImage
With all the booms, are we shell-shocked yet?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Larry Sanger

Larry Sanger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lsanger

23 Oct
Let’s try again.

The Wikipedia “Cardano” article was undeleted today. Cardano is the #10 cryptocurrency with plenty of reason to have an article.

This is an interesting study of how just a few mostly anonymous people on Wikipedia can manipulate info.

The Cardano founder’s rant (above) is highly entertaining and persuasive. His story ought to be told if for no reason than what it illustrates about the seedy operations of “the encyclopedia anybody can edit.”

I’m not endorsing Cardano, which I know little about. Caveat emptor.
Leading the charge against crypto in general on Wikipedia is one David Gerard, who is, let’s just say, one of the people responsible for the mess that Wikipedia has become—and a leader of the libelous, silly RationalWiki. Has been a friend of Jimmy Wales.

duckduckgo.com/?q=%22david+ge…
Read 6 tweets
23 Oct
Live tweeting the debate.

Nice, turning off mics when not your time to answer!
Covid “spikes” here and there, all gone.

Trump’s confidence (swagger) is one of the main things that makes him popular.

Strong first answer.
Biden: 220K dead; blames Trump. 1000 deaths per day.

I don’t believe it.

Just wearing masks would save 100K lives? That’s BS of course.

“I will make sure we have a plan.”
Read 53 tweets
21 Oct
What is your ultimate loyalty?
Trump is right...
If it came down to that, if you must choice between survival in slavery, on the one hand, and death in freedom, which would you choose?
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct
1/ Interesting news this morning. First, Hunter’s laptop it is not a Russian hoax, it is…Hunter’s laptop. zerohedge.com/political/full…
2/ “The Russia excuse ... collapsed when Fox verified the information with someone on the email chain. The Biden campaign has yet to say these emails or photos are not real. The reason? Hunter’s lawyer sent emails trying to recover the hard drive.”

revolver.news/2020/10/steve-…
3/ Interesting old interview with Hunter.

revolver.news/2020/10/old-hu…
Read 6 tweets
16 Oct
1/ Let me "fact-check" the very idea of fact-checking.

I have great contempt for fact-checkers. Here's why.

When people claim to do a fact-check of some claim, what they purport to do is to test it against objective evidence in order to determine whether it is true.
2/ The problem is that the claims they are "fact-checking" are usually ambiguous: they are open to many interpretations. It's easy to show a claim to be false; you merely have to pick an interpretation according to which it is false. That is usually not hard.
3/ Among academics who pride themselves on their intellectual fairness, there is a basic principle, the principle of "charity," according to which you choose an interpretation of your opponent's claim based on which possible interpretation is most likely to be true.
Read 6 tweets
15 Oct
YouTube Qanon purge is here.

It is appalling that now YouTube has taken down channels, like @99freemind, who just research various sources, share info, and draw sometimes wild (sometimes correct) inferences.

If it’s not libel, they should be free to speak their minds, period.
Here’s what I believe about free speech.

This used to be the “liberal” view. Well, it still is. It’s just that the so-called liberals have become so illiberal.

larrysanger.org/2019/05/a-free…
The good news is that you can still find Polly and others on Bitchute.com. I’ll be visiting them more now.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!