1/ Today is my first day of trying to really hone-down a "prediction-based workflow" and so far I'm really loving it.
The basic premise: at 8PM last night I gave myself fifteen minutes to run an imaginary preview of today, highlighting tasks and challenges I thought I'd face.
2/ Key - I also wrote all this down, to keep myself accountable
One way to conceptualize this is with the "managing self-creative self" split.
I was giving my "manager" fifteen minutes to "coach the team" last night. White board, chalk arrows the whole deal.
3/ This AM, I woke, slonked some vitamins and coffee, and the "prediction" was fresh in my mind.
Good to go!
The first and probably most interesting observation was that I then became acutely aware of exactly when I was at risk of diverging from the predicted plan.
4/ This kicks in like a "spidey sense" - a feeling of dissonance, a "wait, this is not what you said you'd be doing" moment.
Which is fine. In fact it's super helpful!
Because the result has been, so far (it's now 7:25AM where I am), a more productive dialogue betw manager -->
5/ and creator-selves!
Win-Win!
Example: Creator self just said, hey, I really want to write this down. I want to write a Twitterthread!
Mgr: Cool Cool. Do it. Just get back to your 7:30AM task like we agreed.
Haha - and with that, my friends, my two selves bid you adieu!
6/ real time update it's 10:58AM and things are going strong
One BIG thing I'm noticing is an increase in real-time, meaningful negotiations between "manager self" and "creative self"
Right now "creative self" is all, "Yeah, I really WANT a fifteen minute exercise break, but.."
7/ Manager self is all, "OK fine but are you sure you'll still have time to get in the work you visualized getting done, before your 1PM commit in two hours?"
creative self pauses and says "yep, pretty much, AND I'll feel more energized."
Mgr-self: OK fine.
And so: it's on.
oops broke my own thread somehow. here the numerical ordering back again ...
wow this is going really well; best way I can describe how it feels to have hold last night's "prediction" in-mind is:
things are more LUCID.
Gonna write more later;
but bookmarking-topics-for-self-to-write-up-ltr: interstitial "events", "decision fatigue"
9/ Quick wrap-up because I am now (8:30PM) "predicting" tomorrow.
Lots more to say about what I learned; + not enough time RN.
I'll do a fuller write-up when time permits ... meanwhile the experiment continues... tomorrow is 2nd iteration, and already in clearer focus.
Yay!
10/ day 2
6.08 AM going through yesterday's prediction brought two things to mind that I missed... this is a great safety net
Visualizing concomitant details helps... I visualized going for a run in the dark while wearing blue flashing LED so now I remember the LED
11/ the beauty is, that I'm already refining and enriching the predictions/visualizations that I made last night
Haha, I am surfing, on a wave made out of time
Ok going for run now.
12/ one very inception-like quality to all this, is that I am now making predictions from within frame of the prediction, as I go
Of course... that's what I was doing all along, but the experiment just made me more aware of this.
It's at the surface of my consciousness now.
13/ fascinating... all the little "pain points" in yesterday's prediction are quickly surfacing, and I am finding quick pre-emptive fixes for them as I go
It's like the movie "memento" except turned inside out
Time and intention acquiring compound interest instead of overdrawn.
14/ biggest difference I can "feel" so far, is that my "prediction" process is based on desire, as much as possible, and the compulsive "must do" of my old to do lists has melted like snow in the sunlight.
(My Colorado inner-kid had to put that there)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK quick @RoamResearch experiment with new, stabilized block-embeds and "attribute tables".
If you want to keep the attribute table columns in a particular order, this is how... (read on)
Usually the ordering moves the "most recently edited" entry to the far right column.
2/ This is a problem if you "need" the columns to be in a certain order (see below pic) because you can't edit them without reshuffling.
HOWEVER if you just put a block embed in the place you want, you can edit into that block embed with no change to table order
NOTE, though ->
3/ you can't directly edit within-table but you CAN click on the entry in an attr-table to bring it up in side window... you can edit its block-embed there, AND use it to navigate to wherever it "lives"
(thus, attr-tables become "indexes" ... one of their secret superpowers).
@dvargas92495 has written jScript that restores value to
"attribute tables" - a partially developed feature that seemed promising - but had a flaw, rendering it hard-to-use.
That flaw seems to have been fixed -->
2. You can now use "Attribute Tables" to bring up auto-populating, SORTABLE tables, based on lines of metadata - equally-indented series of "attributes" (defined by syntax "foo double-colon", like this - "foo::").
What can you do with this?
Start with a simple habit-tracker.
3. Under any given daily note, affix the things you are tracking: (e.g.),
(NOTE: at the SAME level of indent, 1 below page title)
Exercise::
Reading::
Music::
and jot whatever you want into any of the fields following the "::".
OK, people get ready, I'm going to assay a lightning-summary of @RobertHaisfield 's webinar on further unlocking the powers of {{query}}ing in @RoamResearch .
Here are a few of the key things that I gleaned.
1. Querying allows you to have "conversations with your past self."
2. To make those conversations optimally useful, you will want to learn to be artful about what hashtags you choose, and also how you arrange those hashtags.
3. One heuristic to use as you make these decisions is, "under what conditions will future-me want to find this?"
4. It's also worth taking a moment to familiarize yourself with the different behaviors of a query under these different conditions:
a) when hashtags are all inline in the same block,
b) when they are parent-child relationship,
c) and when they are arranged as "siblings".