. @thirumaofficial quotes anti women stuff the Manusmriti says. @khushsundar & BJP twitter erupts in outrage, gets case filed against him. Folks, he's only QUOTING the Manusmriti! If you want to get offended, perhaps you should get offended at the Manusmriti?
That said, imho, it is far more necessary to discuss how Manu mandates that women be treated as property to be controlled by men (that's the quote Yogi A chose to amplify in his writing), than to cite shock value bits that imply he "treats women like prostitutes".
Manu continues to have power in the 21st century because across communities & ideologies, even among those who politics is anti Manuvad, the violence against women's autonomy (especially sexual autonomy) is rampant.
We (men especially) need to consider discussing Manusmriti violence against women's autonomy and how it lives on today EVEN in "our own" social, ideological, political communities, rather than repeating the hot takes that don't force us to look within.
I recall defending @khushsundar in 2005 when she was attacked for her remarks on premarital sex being fine as long as it was safe sex, with 22 cases filed against her for "defaming Tamil womanhood and chastity". It's sad she is party to the same against @thirumaofficial now.
But do note that in 2005, the organisation led by @thirumaofficial had joined the PMK in whipping up patriarchal outrage against @khushsundar. @thirumaofficial had condemned Khushboo's reply to a question on premarital sex (she spoke of safe sex) were "against public order".
Here's my write up from 2005, on the attack on @khushsundar, discussing how even progressive politics in TN pays mere lip service to Periyar, and is deeply patriarchal archive.cpiml.org/liberation/yea…
Here is a report quoting @thirumaofficial as saying the remarks by @khushsundar on safe sex even if it sex before/without marriage, as a threat to "public order". Periyar called that patriarchal public order, bullshit. in.rediff.com/movies/2005/oc…
The essence of the Manusmriti isn't that it "treats women like prostitutes". It is that it treats women like mothers, daughters, wives, sisters to be controlled by fathers, husbands, sons - and decrees that women must NOT be treated as autonomous human beings. @thirumaofficial

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kavita Krishnan

Kavita Krishnan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kavita_krishnan

22 Oct
In a case which Poop India & others have reported as a "love jehad" case in Bareilly, UP & BJP attacked police station: the alleged "victim" has boldly asserted she's an adult, married the man she loves, told BJP men to back off.
. @sharmarekha the woman in this Bareilly case is a victim of violence against her autonomy by BJP men. Why won't @NCWIndia act to support her, her husband & his family, all victims of a patriarchal communal hate crime? Why no action on media calling a love marriage, #LoveJehad?
BJP RSS language of "love jehad" translates to mean: a) We treat women as property of communities b) We wage war on women's autonomy to decide who they love, marry c) We hate Muslims d) We want Manusmriti (with its caste based laws governing love) to replace India's Constitution
Read 4 tweets
20 Oct
Hey @sharmarekha - what on earth is a "love jehad" case? Any case in which a Muslim man and Hindu woman are in love? How dare you remain in your chair as @NCWIndia chief & use a term that a) treats women as property of communities b) hates Muslims? You bring shame to NCW.
Dear @sharmarekha - I have researched the so-called "love jehad" claims extensively (written a whole book about it) and am yet to find a SINGLE case where such claims have been vindicated. Please tell us a single case where the "crime" of "love jehad" has been proved.
In my book #FearlessFreedom @PenguinIndia, I profile the courageous women who have had to take on bigots like you, who sadly head courts and women's commissions and ministries. Remember the supposed Meerut "love jehad case"? It turned out to be a love case, they're married now.
Read 6 tweets
18 Oct
Comrade @Dipankar_cpiml addressing a PC at Muzaffarpur, Bihar in support of the alliance and @cpimlliberation candidate, the young activist Aftab Alam. ImageImage
Comrade Aftab has worked for flood relief and people's welfare and rights, and justice in Bihar for a decade and a half - @Dipankar_cpiml
NDA leaders have no answer to the people's questions about jobs & welfare & migrants' rights. They're trying to divert by fear mongering about the Alliance and CPIML's presence in the Alliance, in particular. Why this desperation?
Read 9 tweets
17 Oct
Thread on the @adrspeaks PC yesterday on alleged "criminal candidates" in Bihar elections. I will explain why ADR's methodology is unprofessional, inaccurate and non-transparent. It equates activists falsely accused of crime (Delhi riot probe style) with criminals-turned-netas
The @adrspeaks released a graph showing that 100% of @cpimlliberation MLAs declared criminal cases. CPIML wears those criminal cases against MLAs as badges of honour, because they are obviously false, punishment for standing with the poor, read: cpiml.net/.../12/no-excu…
Criminal cases do not imply guilt, they show that the ruling regime and administration has filed cases against you, cases which are often false & motivated. The @adrspeaks report does not mention this fact.
Read 21 tweets
6 Oct
In the discussion jostled by @rahulkanwal on @IndiaToday
I wasn't allowed to comment on the discussion re PFI. I wanted to say: there are at least two caste & Hindu supremacist radical outfits based in Western UP and Hathras itself: Savarna Parishad & the Hindu Yuva Vahini.
The anchor should have questioned the fact that "literature" cannot be "suspicious", cannot be grounds for arrest, least of all of a journalist. If Savarna Parishad or HYV or Hindu Janjagran Samiti (accused in blasts) can move freely to any village in India why not PFI?
All the violence seen in Hathras has been on part of caste supremacists: who raped, fatally injured the victim, their men in uniform burned her body to destroy evidence, besieged her family, HYV chief the UP CM paid @ConceptPR_India to spin narrative to paint the victim as liar.
Read 9 tweets
5 Oct
We need to ensure the movement for #JusticeForHathrasVictim is sustained. It must be an anti caste, anti patriarchy, anti Manuvad movement. Come join us in burning effigy of Manuvadi UP CM, & his Manuvadi article opposing reservations & supporting women's slavery to men.
This is a screenshot from Yogi's article which was on his website from 2014 to 2017, taken down after he became CM. It attacks SC ST OBC reservations. Article title "Matrshakti, Bhartiyata ke sandarbh mein"
Another screenshot from Yogi's 2014 article, where he says women will become demons if they do "men's work" (he implies being an MLA or MP is men's work, since he is arguing against women's reservations). Note, article is not on website but its 404 error footprint still is!
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!