Sacha Baron Cohen films—and the "Borat" character, in particular—are the ultimate form of postmodern thought policing. After all, the best kind of racism, anti-Semitism, sexism, and homophobia is that which the system controls.
The funny moments in Cohen's films are purchased on the cheap. They come when the audience is allowed to indulge in crude racism and sexism, usually coming from the mouth of Borat himself. Or, in the guise of "Brüno," when we're granted the right to laugh at an absurd queen.
Cohen can play to the gay stereotype with Brüno precisely because Cohen himself has the stamp of approval by the liberal system. We're thus allowed to laugh at the gay minstrel show precisely because the moral and political battle over homosexuality has already been decided.
There's a double move here, too. In many instances, Brüno is depicted as an Austrian crypto-Nazi. Thus, the system can subliminally infer that "fascism" arises due to hidden sexual perversion and "repression."
This brings us to the recent scene involving Rudy Giuliani. I won't cast judgement on Rudy, because the scene is heavily edited and the whole thing is obviously a setup.
Maybe Rudy was just tucking in his shirt... maybe he had images of an afternoon delight with a blonde bimbo dancing through his head. I wouldn't fault him if the latter were the case. He's a man, after all, and we can't expect moral perfection.
But the whole message of the scene is something quite perverse. Heterosexual behavior is pathologized: Rudy is depicted as a creepy monster. The voice of morality comes in the form of a transexual making anal-sex jokes.
Cohen, dressed as an out-of-control pervert, is puritanically scolding Rudy for, well, doing what red-blooded, healthy men have done since the Stone Age. That is truly perverse.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Joe Biden will comfortably win the Presidency of the United States, earning between 325 and 375 Electoral College votes, matching Barack Obama’s results in 2008 and 2012.
In the age of polarization—and in light of Trump’s tremendous popularity among conservatives—Biden’s victory will be viewed as a “landslide” and a national denunciation of Trumpism, leading to demoralization, confusion, and infighting among the Republican Party faithful.
In addition, Democrats will take control of the Senate, with a tight majority of 51 to 49. More than one long-time Republican stalwart and Trump ally will be sent packing.
It's not wrong—not entirely—to read Nietzsche as the ultimate "self-help guru," on an individual and group level. "Chicken soup for the soul writ large," as it were.
Nietzsche demands that you face the truth of the "death of God": the loss of credibility of religion, philosophy, and morality—institutions that have undergone such scrutiny that they can no longer stand. Don't deny it. The first step is admitting that we have a problem!
Nietzsche's solution, imagistically offered, is to view the collapse of Western civilization—and your own resultant emotional destress—as bringing us into a world of new horizons. An opportunity for creativity and artistry...or great terror and despair.
I'm skeptical of the #HunterBidenEmails. No, I don't think Biden is an angel. To the contrary, the basic accusation that he was given a lucrative sinecure in Ukraine in a tacit exchange for influence with the America VP is almost certainly true.
"Hunter Bidens" are the predictable, unavoidable outcomes of empire. And stories like his—including his fall from grace—have reoccured over and over since Babylon. Child of privilege gets cushy job in exchange for influence + too much money and debauchery = scandale du jour.
The main source of my skepticism about the emails is that the acquisition of these things seems sketchy as hell. A computer repairman took them off Biden's laptop (likely illegally), when it was in for repair. He then contacted Rudy! It's nuts.
I have, rather reluctantly, come to the conclusion that a) some kind of "herd immunity" to #COVID19 is inevitable and b) knowing this, bringing about this outcome in a reasonable fashion is the best policy.
Last spring, we were dealing with two problems in addressing #COVID19 in a rational manner:
a) ignorance about its nature and effects (it was a novel virus, after all);
b) rank denial, wishful thinking, and delusion on the part of Americans, particularly Republicans.
We should remember how far we've come. Last spring, if anyone suggested 200,000 deaths, he'd be laughed off as a doomsayer indulging in "apocalypse porn." Today, 300,000 deaths by next summer seems baked into the cake.
It's a complicated story. The key thing is that Trump goes hunting where the ducks are. Before Trump, Steve Bannon and others recognized immigration as an extremely hot, though often avoided, issue that viscerally activated much of the GOP base.
It's possible that if Trump had launched his campaign a day earlier or a day later than June 16, 2015, he might have focused on something else. But he defined himself with that "not sending their best" line.
In 2015 and half of 2016, Trump absolutely engaged in outreach to the Alt-Right writ large, as did outlets like Breitbart by mid-2016. This allowed Trump to do an end run around the establishment—and, ironically, his future base, the Religious Right, which then backed Cruz.