Breathtaking: statewide, Texas just surpassed 80% of its total 2016 votes cast, leading the nation. And there's still more than a week of voting to go.
Also, tbh the dropbox issue was never going to have that big an impact on turnout b/c a relatively tiny share of TX voters is eligible to vote by mail to begin with.
You know what will have a big impact on TX's outcome? Turnout in the heavily Hispanic border counties, which is currently at ~32% of registered voters compared to 50%+ in TX's major metro suburbs.
To be clear, 32% at this point isn't terrible by historical standards, including 2016/2018. It just underscores how much untapped potential there is for Dems in that region of the state.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tfw you've been devouring hundreds of district-level polls for decades and everyone has suddenly woken up to how instructive they can be.
The truth is, the majority of presidential race polling is conducted at the *district,* not state or national level.
Most of it is never made public by parties/PACs, but is of high quality b/c it's conducted to make critical resource allocation decisions in House races.
Four years ago, these district-level polls showed flashing red warning signs for Clinton in heavily white working-class districts (see below), but many people overlooked them.
On one hand, TX isn't (and was never) poised to be a "tipping point" for 270 EVs. On the other, even a modest investment in several smaller, low-turnout TX media markets could now determine which way TX tips.
Here are my updated demographic splits in average crosstabs of live-interview national polls, w/ new @QuinnipiacPoll thrown into the October mix.
A few breathtaking splits:
- Biden now +25 w/ women
- Biden now +10 w/ seniors
In my view, the biggest "tell" Trafalgar etc. are off the mark? Private, district-level GOP polling conducted to make spending decisions backs up what we're seeing in averages of live-interview polls: Trump doing terribly w/ college whites/women into October.
The only group where we're seeing improvement in Trump's margin vs. '16? Hispanic voters.
Today, live-interview average has Trump down 27 points, vs. 38 points per @UpshotNYT's average of final '16 polls.
More people have now early voted in TX than the number of people who voted for Donald Trump in TX in 2016.
(Disclaimer: this suggests voter interest/intensity is way higher than in the past and we're headed for massive turnout - as we are everywhere - but not much beyond that.)
TX early/mail votes cast so far in 2020, as share of total 2016 votes cast:
Clinton-won counties: 60%
Trump-won counties: 59%
Another reminder you shouldn't read a partisan advantage from huge turnout. Both parties' bases highly motivated.
Brief thread: here's why I don't put a ton of stock into the *overall* pro-R registration trend in FL from '16 to '20. Take the 33 least populous of FL's 67 counties, which are mostly rural and located in the north/panhandle (aka the Deep South)...
In November 2016, these 33 counties collectively had a narrow 42%-40% GOP voter registration advantage. But here's how they *voted:*
Trump: 369,045 (67%)
Clinton: 170,871 (31%)
Btw, Trump's statewide margin was 112,911 votes.
Fast forward to 2020: the final data shows the GOP voter registration advantage in these 33 counties has grown to 48%-32%.
These aren't new Trump voters. These are existing Trump voters formalizing their party change from D to R.
Just in: final FL voter reg. data. Since this March's primary, here are each party's net gains:
GOP: +344,465
Dem: +197,821
NPA/Other: +197,818
Compare to the same period in '16:
GOP: +274,207
Dem: +307,961
NPA/Other: +220,857
Trump's '16 FL margin: 112,911 votes
For reference, here's the story I wrote for @NBCNews a few weeks ago putting the GOP's recent registration success in FL/NC/PA in context: nbcnews.com/politics/2020-…
Here's the final Nov. 2020 FL voter breakdown by party and race (14,441,869 registrants):