The US elections are now climate elections, as Trump focuses on discrediting Biden's statement about transitioning from oil to renewable energy. It's the fossil fuel lobby versus sensible climate policy. The 20th Century pitched against the 21st. (1/🧵)
Stopping #GlobalWarming is only possible by getting beyond fossil fuels. All nations on this planet agreed in Paris to stop warming well below 2°C. Most of the fossil fuel resources must remain in the ground for that. 2/🧵
China plans to be climate neutral by 2060. Japan, Canada and the EU by 2050. The world is getting out of coal, oil and gas. Trying to scandalise this while the country burns and is ravaged by storms and rising seas, is about as smart as recommending to drink disinfectant. 3/🧵
Trying to delay the transition away from fossil energy only makes things worse. I sincerely hope US voters are clever enough to recognise that. Because we're all in this together. The fate of the world depends on US voters, more than ever before. 4/🧵

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stefan Rahmstorf 😷

Stefan Rahmstorf 😷 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rahmstorf

15 Sep
Und nun die Wettervorhersage für Dienstag, den 15. September...
Es freut mich, dass viele hier auf den Unterschied von Wetter und Klima hinweisen! Aber wussten Sie auch, dass der Klimawandel inzwischen schon im täglichen Wetter nachweisbar ist? ethz.ch/de/news-und-ve…
Wer sich für die langfristige Temperaturentwicklung in 🇩🇪 interessiert:
Read 6 tweets
17 Aug
News about the death of the Greenland Ice Sheet is greatly exaggerated. What the new paper shows is an observed increase in solid ice discharge into the ocean, which has been at a higher rate than before during the past 15 years. The authors basically say: if this continues, ...
...then the Greenland Ice Sheet will continue to lose mass.
But due to that, the ice front retreats from the ocean, as nicely shown e.g. in Andy Aschwanden's detailed simulations:
And when the ice loses contact with the ocean, the ice discharge stops.
The tipping point for losing the Greenland Ice Sheet altogether therefore depends on surface melt permanently exceeding snowfall and does not involve solid ice discharge. Whether this real tipping point of Greenland has been crossed, we do not know.
Read 7 tweets
11 Aug
Gern, aber was genau ist der Fehler? In ihrem Artikel greifen Sie die Grafik ja nur mit zwei Falschbehauptungen an. @AxelBojanowski 1/🧵
Erstens, sie sei nicht in der Fachliteratur publiziert. Stimmt nicht. Sogar sehr prominent, seit vier Jahren, viel zitiert, und ich habe in der Zeit keine Kritik dazu gehört. Ein Fachjournalist sollte das nicht verpasst haben. 2/🧵
Zweitens, die Grafik zeige jährliche Daten. Stimmt nicht, es sind über 30 Jahre klimatologisch geglättete Daten. Niemand hat behauptet, es sei "bereits wärmer als während aller Jahre seit der Eiszeit". Über einzelne Jahre kann man das gar nicht sagen. 3/🧵
Read 11 tweets
7 Aug
Beim Herunterspielen der #Erderwärmung hat die "Welt" offenbar jedes Maß verloren. Sie bezichtigt in Trump-Manier das ZDF der “Desinformation“. Nur weil das ZDF es gewagt hat, eine völlig korrekte Klimadatengrafik zu zeigen. @welt 1/🧵
Die Folgerung, dass wir heute bereits den Temperaturbereich des Holozän (pink) verlassen haben, ist keine "Ente", wie Welt-Autor Axel Bojanowski behauptet, sondern das zeigte schon der Weltklimarat IPCC (Abb. 1.2 des Sonderberichts zu 1,5 Grad) von 2018. 2/🧵
Dass in einer Grafik paläoklimatische Daten zusammen mit modernen Messdaten gezeigt werden ist auch kein "Taschenspieltrick", sondern in der Fachliteratur durchaus üblich. Siehe die aktuellste Holozänanalyse aus Nature Scientific Data: nature.com/articles/s4159… 3/🧵
Read 15 tweets
15 Jul
How can you tell who is a real scientist in the public debate? Scientists do research to find out new things, and document results in peer-reviewed journals. Relevant results are cited in other research articles, and this gets documented in data bases like Web of Science. 1/🧵 Image
My example graph shows some climate scientists who are prominent in public debate, e.g. on Twitter. My point is not ranking or exact numbers, just the fact that the work of experienced climate scientists tends to have been cited thousands of times in other research articles. 2/🧵
At the bottom are two prominent characters who are not distinguished by scientific achievements. They appear in Web of Science mostly as this database covers some non-peer-reviewed articles from New Scientist, Foreign Affairs or Scientific American. realclimate.org/index.php/arch… 3/🧵
Read 6 tweets
22 Jun
Without words.
One man has words for this:
"Slow the testing down, please!"
Spoken at what may well turn out to be a super-spreader event.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!