Why discrediting Manu is a Christian propaganda and to Tamils.
The first mention of Manu in Sanatana Dharma texts, we see is in Sri Math Bhagavata Puranam - Chapter 8,Versus 24.
It clearly states who Manu was.
The first mention of Manu in Sanatana Dharma texts, we see is in Sri Math Bhagavata Puranam - Chapter 8,Versus 24.
It clearly states who Manu was.
It mentions that the a Pandya King named Sathya Varadhan, from Madurai, it goes on to detail how he became Manu.
When Sathya Vardhan was performing sandhya Vandhanam on the banks of river Krithamala, a fish comes into his hand and talks to him, and warns him about a flood,
When Sathya Vardhan was performing sandhya Vandhanam on the banks of river Krithamala, a fish comes into his hand and talks to him, and warns him about a flood,
and advices him to get male and female of every living species, into a boat.
Durning the floods when the boat was caught in rapids, Maha Vishnu comes as an avatar of Fish which we refer as Matchi AvatarAvatar and saves the boat to a hill top.
Durning the floods when the boat was caught in rapids, Maha Vishnu comes as an avatar of Fish which we refer as Matchi AvatarAvatar and saves the boat to a hill top.
It was after this the first governing smritis were written, The pandya king was named MANU, and due to this we humans were named as "Manushan" Or "Manidhan".
This is the origin of the first Manu, different smritis were writtern and executed to suit different lifestyles.
This is the origin of the first Manu, different smritis were writtern and executed to suit different lifestyles.
The discrediting and demonizing of Manu is a xian propaganda as the entire story of Noah was stolen from Bhagavata Puranam, and further they discredited it by the Myth of Ham to deepen the jathi varna fault lines in Indian civilisation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
