Happy (belated) 75th Birthday @UN (#UN75)!

Actually, a correction: the United Nations is 78 years old...and it's birthday was not this past Saturday (Oct 24)

[THREAD]
To be clear: the "United Nations" as a global "international organization" was formed 75 years ago this past Saturday (Oct 24).

But the "United Nations" itself is a bit older.
The "United Nations" itself was formed on January 1, 1942 as a military alliance against Nazi Germany
The British, Americans, Soviets, and Chinese signed the document on January 1 (note how these are 4 of the eventual 5 Permanent Security Council members). 22 other countries signed it over the next few days.

So the UN's hierarchy was baked in from the beginning.
The timing of the UN Declaration should be unsurprising: less than a month after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
But a key reason that the Declaration could be signed so quickly is because it was simply an extension of an earlier document: the August 14, 1941 Atlantic Charter between 🇺🇸&🇬🇧
The UN Declaration itself makes explicit that it is an extension of the Charter
The Atlantic Charter outlined several principles to be achieved in the post-war world (e.g. economic collaboration; abandonment of use of force), but a key part was "the final destruction of the Nazi tyranny"

avalon.law.yale.edu/wwii/atlantic.…
But the Atlantic Charter was the product of an even earlier document: "ABC-1" signed between the British and Americans in March 1941.

"ABC" simply stands for: "American-British Conversations"
These negotiations took place from January 1941 to March 1941. They were prompted Churchill, in a December 1940 correspondence, bluntly laying out to Roosevelt the difficulties Britain faced as it alone faced Hitler in Europe. He wrote:
The talks, lasting about 2 months, produced the sixty-seven page ABC-1 report. This report, which outlined such things as the "Germany first" strategy (i.e. defeat Germany before Japan), served as the basis for the much shorter Atlantic Charter and UN Declaration.
For the curious, the full report is reproduced in "Pearl Harbor Attack: Hearings Before the Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack, Congress of the United States" (1946)

books.google.com/books?id=zZMgA…
I briefly recount the negotiations leading to the ABC report in my book "Arguing About Alliances"

amazon.com/Arguing-about-…
So that is how the "United Nations" came about.

But why did all of the above lead to the creation of a permanent international organization after the war?

That is explored by @stephenwertheim in this fascinating @JContHist paper

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00…
He correctly points out that while documents like the Atlantic Charter describe post-war principles, they did not actually call for a permanent IO.

Instead, a global IO could ease "buy in" at home and abroad to US post-war global leadership (or "dominance")
@stephenwertheim elaborates on the push for US post-war dominance, and the UN as an instrument for that dominance, in his new book "Tomorrow, the World"

amazon.com/Tomorrow-World…
Regardless of the motivation for creating the UN as an IO, the UN as an alliance was in place by 1942.

Wartime propaganda ensued!
So I grudgingly declared "Happy Birthday" to the @UN on Oct 24, even though it's actual birthday is when we commonly say "Happy New Years" (Jan 1)!

[END]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

25 Oct
The Armenia-Azerbaijan war won't seem to end.

Will the Caucasus become the Balkans of the 21st Century: a (frequently overlooked) conflict-prone region that eventually sparks a wider war?

Let's compare the Caucasus 2020 to the Balkans 1914

[THREAD]

reuters.com/article/uk-arm…
There are three points to compare

(1) Staunch rivalries (and territorial disputes) in the region

(2) Region marred by conflict

(3) Alliance ties to outside powers
First, there are indeed two staunch rivals in the Caucasus: Armenia and Azerbaijan. In fact, the war currently unfolding between Armenia and Azerbaijan is the second between the two countries since the end of the Cold War

warontherocks.com/2020/10/the-se…
Read 25 tweets
8 Oct
"Competitor? Adversary? Enemy?"

@SusanPage posed that question about 🇨🇳's relationship with 🇺🇸 during #VicePresidentialDebate.

Are such distinctions useful and do any of the terms accurately describe 🇺🇸-🇨🇳 relations?

Let's break it down.

[THREAD]
To start, notice what were NOT options given by Page:

"friends, partners, allies"

(though Page did acknowledge that 🇨🇳 could be a "potential partner" for addressing 🇰🇵 and climate change)

So we're starting with the presumption of a "confrontational" relationship.
From the standpoint of foreign policy discourse, there can be value in saying that someone is a "competitor" (competition is "healthy") rather than an "enemy" (who is "evil"). @EdwardGoldberg makes this distinction in a piece for @Salon

salon.com/2019/06/22/chi…
Read 23 tweets
24 Sep
Foreign Policy will not be a key topic at the first Trump v Biden debate.

That's a shame, since foreign policy goes a long way toward explaining why we're facing a Trump v Biden choice in November.

[THREAD]
To be clear: I am NOT offering a story about how the collapse of the Soviet Union ended the "Cold War Consensus" and this collapse brought us to today.

journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.230… Image
First of all, if there ever was such a consensus, it was gone long before 1990

cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Read 27 tweets
17 Sep
Nuclear war almost happened in August 2017.

What does this teach us about the causes of war?

Answer: That we still don't really know why war happens.

[THREAD]

washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/…
Start with one of international relations primary models for war: bargaining theory
The idea is the following: since war is costly (think of all the millions of people Mattis feared would die in a 🇰🇵🇺🇸 war), states have an incentive to "strike a bargain" that avoids war.
Read 23 tweets
9 Sep
Do top US Generals seek war for profit, as claimed by @realDonaldTrump?

No...but it's complicated.

[THREAD]
It's complicated because we have to answer two questions:

1) Is war profitable?

2) Can generals earn some of those profits?

Let's tackle one at a time.
Is war profitable?

You bet! At least for some.
Read 30 tweets
5 Sep
Let's talk about the 1918 Battle of Belleau Wood and why the American Marines who died in it were not "suckers"

[THREAD]
To start, why were Americans even there? Specifically, why did the US enter World War I?

That's not a simple answer to give (so I'm not going to 🤨at @realDonaldTrump for not understanding why the US entered the war on the side of the British-French-Italians)
Woodrow Wilson was conflicted on whether to enter the war at all.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!