OK tweeps, today is the day, our work on single cell analysis of clonal evolution and myeloid transformation is out, led by the best in the biz, @lindemilesphd and @bowman_rl nature.com/articles/s4158…
2. Please also see awesome paper by @DrKTakahashi and co at @NatureComms and preprint by Adam Abate on DNA/protein sc sequencing/tech dev. All together the collective work is so cool!
3. This work started with a simple question; can we decipher somatic clonal evolution from normal stem cells to CH and myeloid malignancies? What do we learn from charting this journey?
4. We did single cell DNA sequencing on 146 samples from 123 patients with CH, MPN and AML, focusing on 31 genes recurrently mutated in these diseases
5. This allowed us to delineate mutations at single clone resolution and to build maps of clonal complexity and architecture in CH, MPN and AML, which taught us a few things..
6. First, CH (with >1 mutation) is a disease of oligoclonality, with different mutations in different clones
7. By contrast, MPN and AML were diseases of complex clonal evolution, with progressive mutational acquisition, clonal branching, and emergence of dominant clones and significant subclones.
8. The majority of AML patients have 1-2 dominant clones, and these clones frequently harbor co-occurring mutations in epigenetic regulators
9. FLT3/RAS mutations were rarely in dominant clones, and were commonly subclonal
10. We then used a hidden Markov model to predict the optimal clonal trajectory in each sample, allowing us to 1) predict the likely initiating mutation and 2) show which mutational combinations cooperate to drive clonal expansion
11. Specific mutational combinations, such as co-occuring DNMT3A/IDH and NPM1c/FLT3 mutations, promote clonal expansion. These combinations are the “secret sauce” of mutational cooperativity we need to understand.
12. Taken together, these data suggest that patients with myeloid malignancies manifest as a complex ecosystem of clones which evolves over time, and that single cell sequencing gives a glimpse into this milieu not seen with conventional bulk sequencing.
13. We then used combined single cell DNA sequencing + cell surface profiling to characterize cell surface protein expression based on clone genotype. Specific subclones, esp those w/ signaling mutations were associated w/ specific immunophenotypes (Ras + CD11c expression)
14.Importantly, in 8 of 14 AML samples, the dominant clone had a distinct immunophenotype from the minor subclones, suggesting that cell surface targeting in AML may need to be clone-directed, and not just bulk disease directed
15. We also profiled serial samples showing MPN->AML transformation and pre/post FLT3 inhibitor response/resistance, giving insights into how this approach can be used to delineate clonal evolution over time.
16. This work was all made possible by the two best colleagues I could ask for, @lindemilesphd and @bowman_rl. Their work, drive, and insight, including to get critical sequencing data done and analyzed as the lab was shutting down in March, made this happen. You both rock.
17. Lots more to do in this space, and lots of groups will be doing it! Our data and code are available, and we’ll chat with anyone about what we’ve done, how we did it, and what we learne
20. And like a Marvel movie, if you're still reading->We promise to take this story to the next level with mechanistic/functional studies, using this work as our "blueprint" to the Death Star. AML, we're coming for you, stay tuned!!!
21. One important note; based on my experience working with Mission Bio I recently joined their SAB (noted in paper COI). Enjoyed working with them on this project and moving forwards, pls note this work is meant to illustrate power of SC-mutationl studies no matter the platform
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. You are the consummate scientist, and you and your group's contributions to cancer epigenetics, leukemia biology, epigenetic therapies, and immune-oncology are original, impactful, and greatly influence how we think about cancer biology and do our own work.
2. You're an amazing mentor, institutional/international leader, and colleague.
Part 2 of an awesome week of great collaborative studies coming out; the Beat AML Master Trial! An amazing effort led by Amy Burd @LLSResearch , John Byrd @OSUCCC_James , Brian Druker @OHSUNews and myself @SloanKettering.
1.This study started in a small hotel conference room at ASH 2015; a group of us got together and wondered if it was time for a genomic-guided clinical trial in AML. The LLS and their CEO @LouisJDeGennaro saw the possibility, and challenged us to make it happen
2.After a year of discussions including Sunday AM calls, many conversations with our amazing colleagues at the FDA, and lots of discussions with academic and industry partners->we decided to move forward and make it happen
PIs. ask yourself and your lab some important questions today. 1. If someone can do their job at home (or part of their job), are you letting them do it? 2. Did you freeze down aliquots of your ongoing cell culture experiments in case you have to stop ongoing experiments?
3. Is your animal colony tightly maintained, and can a "skeleton" crew of people from the lab take turns maintaining it if needed?
4. If anyone in your group has child-care responsibilities due to school closures etc->is it clear they should go home immediately?
One of the hardest things to figure out as a PI, especially a young PI, is "when to hold em and when to fold em" with respect to appealing/revising a paper with tough reviews. A few thoughts
1. Don't ever figure this out alone, or even just within your lab. Ask peers, mentors and THE EDITOR if the revision is feasible
2. If there are experiments suggested by reviewers which you feel are not reasonable or out of scope, discuss with the editor before you begin revising (and not 6 months later!)
The chalk talk; my own personal two cents... 1. The goal of a chalk talk is not to show how much you know, or to show all the ideas and projects you can think or or actually accomplish
2) It is to show
A. feasible research plan which will lead to results, papers and grants
B. ability to take in others' ideas/questions, to respond thoughtfully and engage the people in the room in a back and forth
C. get everyone in the room excited to have you as a colleague
3. The majority of the chalk talk should be on your major planned area of study->down the fairway. Someone should be able to see how it will transmit into a grant (R01) and into papers. Lay it out as close to a grant as you can and make it easy for the audience to see...
It is now interview season! a few thoughts for those going on job interviews for lab based PI positions. 1) Get there the night before the interview, even if no dinner. If no dinner scheduled and you have a friend there, go out for a bite and get the real scoop
2) Look at one paper from each person you will meet, and get the overall gist. If the conversation in any one-on-one stalls, ask them about this paper and their work! we all love to talk about our own science and you can soak it in...
3) stick to your routine. if you normally go to the gym/exercise before your work day at home, do the same. I found that I was always up early before interview days and had to do something to reduce my jitters.