Where can I find definitions of "sterilising vaccine" and "neutralising vaccine"?
2/ Nobody has replied, and I can't remember what I was reading that prompted the question. So I'll say what I think the answer is!
At least for "sterilising vaccine" (or, if you use US spelling, "sterilizing vaccine".
3/ A sterilising vaccine is one which provides sterilising immunity.
"Sterilizing immunity means that the immune system is able to stop a pathogen, including viruses, from replicating within your body." thehill.com/changing-ameri…
(As the context is the Covid-19 pandemic, I shall in this thread, for brevity, refer to "virus" - but the concept applies equally to other pathogens; this is just shorthand. Dont @ me. )
5/ Sterilising immunity means that if you are exposed to the virus, it cannot infect you. It cannot replicate in your body. So you can't be infectious, and infect others.
6/ Ideally, and Covid-19 vaccine would provide sterilising immunity, so people who have responded to the vaccine can't infect others.
This means it will provide herd immunity.
7/ A vaccine might protect the person who has been vaccinated, so that they don't get ill (or not seriously) if infected.
8/ The (no longer used) un-conjugated meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines did this, for example: they prevented invasive disease, but didn't stop the bacteria growing in the nasopharynx, so people who had been vaccinated could still be colonised and infectious.
9/ It was also suggested, when we switched from oral (live virus) polio vaccine to inactivated injected vaccine that the virus might be able to replicate in the gut - the vaccinated individual protected, but not providing herd immunity.
10/ Most vaccines, however, do provide sterilising immunity.
11/ Note that a vaccine that provides sterilising immunity is not (necessarily) the same as a therapeutic vaccine.
12/ A therapeutic vaccine would not only prevent people from becoming infectious, but would also stimulate the immune system in such a way that it clears "dormant" or "latent" infection.
13/ There were hopes, for example, that HPV vaccine would not only prevent future infection; but would also clear current infection. (HPV infection can cause cancer - but only after the infection has not been cleared, but has been present for many years.)
14/ TB is another example. Many people who are infected with TB clear the infection; in some, the bacteria remain, hidden away, able to reactivate if the immune system becomes weakened. Work has been underway for years to find a vaccine that would clear the infection.
15/ It's particularly important for TB, because the bacteria is able to become resistant to many, even all known antibiotics (or "antimicrobial chemotherapy", to be pedantic).
A therapeutic vaccine could mean antibiotics are not required.
16/ Of course, there are many other properties of an ideal vaccine: works at all ages; no significant side effects; effective in all recipients; long, ideally permanent duration of protection; cheap and quick to produce in bulk; easy to distribute (no cold chain)…
17/ …Easy to [self-]administer - eg via vaccine microneedle patches; does not interfere with other vaccines; a single dose will suffice; antibodies created react with stable parts of the virus, so mutations in the virus don't render the vaccine inefficient…
18/ I will be very interested to see what happens if we start using more vector vaccines, for example. If you become immune to the vector, will you subsequently respond to future vaccinations using the same vector?
19/ I also asked about neutralising vaccines.
I think this refers to vaccines which stimulates the production of neutralising antibodies.
20/ This article on neutralising antibodies says they "…are responsible for blocking the entry of a pathogen into a cell so that it is firstly unable to infect healthy cells, and secondly, it is unable to replicate and cause severe infection."
Following on my marathon thread on testing ( threadreaderapp.com/thread/1308088… ), some thoughts on the app, which is due to be launched this week.
1/9
Most people with Covid-19 will never be identified.
Most never have symptoms. Few will be tested, and the test misses 70% of sick people, and even more of those without symptoms.
2/9
Which means, the app will only ever identify a fraction of people with Covid-19.
So not having been alerted that you've been in contact with somebody who might be infectious won't mean you haven't been.
Diagnosis of SARS-CoV2 is far from straightforward. It includes-
Identifying cause of new, significant illness.
Identifying people who are potentially infectious.
Identifying people with late complications.
We are particularly concerned, now, about identifying people who could infect others.
Difficult, since most infections are in people with no or minor symptoms.
This may explain the clamour for tests.
But tests are very poor at identifying these people.
We know that - in sick adults - a single PCR tests will miss >=30% of cases. (Two tests will still miss >=20%.) In asymptomatic but infectious people it will miss more of the cases; and it cannot detect people who have been infected, but are not yet infectious.
Particularly since I've been reporting via covid.joinzoe.com for weeks.
1/9
Interesting to hear more about the wide range of symptoms you can get. The classic 3 symptoms at eg gov.uk/government/pub… were the most discriminatory symptoms in people I'll enough to be admitted to hospital.
2/9
In milder cases - and especially in children - other symptoms are as or more common. Eg fatigue, loss of appetite (skipping meals), rashes, diarrhoea.
3/9
I was just asked to comment on Coronavirus vaccines. I thought twitter might be interested in my response.
There are many different vaccines in production, and for a vaccine geek like me, it’s fascinating.
1/7
I was saying that the future of vaccines was likely to be in DNA/RNA vaccines two decades ago – and then they almost disappeared off the radar, apart…
2/7
…apart from some trials of cancer vaccines (cleverly providing personalised cancer cell marker genes with conjugate molecules, effectively tricking the body into manufacturing a ready-conjugated vaccine).
3/7
Now that we are routinely testing lots of people - including care home staff and residents, and NHS staff - we are picking up positive results in asymptomatic people.
1/17
Where these are genuine cases, this is good.
The problem is many are being detected in people who had tested positive previously.
tldr: each time you run a "cycle" you double the amount of RNA in the sample. The number of times you do it is called the "cycle threshold" "Ct) ; the more often you have to do this before you can detect it, the less RNA there must have been in the original sample.
3/17
Setting aside for the moment the impact on morale of the hardworking public health workforce, five criteria against which to judge SoS speech on Public Health. #PHE
1/6
Criterion 1: Will the proposed change break down barriers within public health and between public health and the NHS and other stakeholders? #PHE
2/6
Criterion 2: Will the changes reverse the years of funding cuts in public health and transfer money from private sector contracts to the public health system? #PHE
3/6