Actor Abduction case: The victim and the prosecution have moved the Kerala High Court in the sexual assault and abduction case in which actor #Dileep is an accused.
The victim and the prosecution have alleged bias on the part of the Additional Sessions Judge handling the case, and seek a Transfer of the case to another Court.
The Kerala High Court is expected to take up the petitions today.
The prosecution had earlier petitioned the Trial Judge to halt the trial and allow them to approach the High Court. This was rejected last week. barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Court assembles. Both Petitions will be taken up after 12 PM.
Hearing begins.
Senior Advocate S. Sreekumar begins for the victim.
Prosecutor Suman Chakravarthy begins on behalf of the prosecution.
Why was the fact of the victim being harassed not brought to the notice of the Trial Court earlier: Court
We made oral submissions, we did all that we could to cooperate: Prosecution
Unheard of orders were being passed, service of reports to the prosecution was being dispensed with!: Prosecution
There were almost 20 lawyers present in an in camera hearing, the victim was being harassed like anything!: Sr Adv S. Sreekumar for the victim
I'll go through the affidavit and the allegations, I'll pass Orders
We will submit all that transpired during the hearing in a sealed cover: Prosecution
Don't make personal allegations against the judicial officer, the written submissions should be carefully worded: Court
We will do so, we will describe everything that happened: Prosecution
Matter will now be taken up on Monday, November 2.
[Actor Assault case] Victim harassed in open court, 20 lawyers were present despite in-camera proceedings: Prosecution tells Kerala High Court
Nyaya Forum in collaboration with Roots Resources interviews Senior Lawyer Nitya Ramakrishnan on various aspects of Criminal Prosecution, Lawyering and the Justice System.
Watch Live:
Mustafa Rajkotwala introduces Senior Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan
Nitya Ramakrishnan: I was a student of philosophy. In some ways, this is a continuation. Principles of deduction, inference, use of language, text... Perhaps that is an explanation.
Kerala High Court will shortly pronounce orders in the anticipatory bail applications moved by dubbing artist Bhagyalakshmi and feminist activists Diya Sana and Sreelakshmi Arackal, accused of assaulting a YouTuber for his slurs on feminists.
An intervention application has been filed on behalf of the YouTuber Vijay P. Nair.
Advocate Arjun Venogopal is appearing on Nair's behalf.
#BombayHighCourt extends abeyance of orders wrt to demolition/eviction/dispossession till the December 22, 2020.
“any order or decree for eviction / dispossession /
demolition which has been passed by any court / tribunal / authority shall remain in abeyance"
The court had earlier extended the abeyance orders till October 31, 2020. However despite opening up of various sectors in State, the court opined that access to justice was still not easy.
Breaking: Plea in Supreme Court seeks to protect fundamental rights of people of District Mewat-Nuh as they are being "forcefully converted to Islam" and is in a pitiable condition compared to the "dominant Muslim group." #SupremeCourt #conversion @Districtnuh
The petition prays for restoration of land, properties, cremation sites of Hindus and form an SIT to probe instances of gang rapes, murders and kidnapping committed by "Muslims" upon the "Hindu residents of the place."
Plea says that after the establishment of Tablighi Jammat the Neo Muslims became fundamentalist Muslims and slowly
they over powered the entire area and at present they are more than 95% in the area after eliminating Hindus from the area.
A Supreme Court bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan to shortly hear Uutarakhand Chief Minister Trivendra Singh Rawat's plea challenging the Uttarakhand HC order asking for CBI FIR against him and quashing charges against 2 investigative journalists. @tsrawatbjp @samachar_plus
Attorney General KK Venugopal for @tsrawatbjp : The CM was not a party in this case and the HC ordered a CBI probe. This is against SC verdicts which disallows destabilizing the government as such verdicts demand resignation of the CM which is happening.
AG: The question in one of the cases by you states that can the court suo motu orders an investigation. In this case, no notice was issued to the Chief Minsiter.