[thread] 1/ Strange digital #deception going on about UK hospitals trying to create idea covid19 isn't serious or stressing the NHS. It all started when @Intuitive1966 asked a question about whether hospitals were full. In steps @madogs93 - who claims to be a 'ward sister'
2/ in a '1600 bedder'. For those of us who have never heard this expression before (and that's all of us), this refers to the number of beds in the hospital. The tweet, designed to irresponsibly downplay severity of the pandemic, got 1600 retweets (one RT per bed). As many of you
3/ have noted, there was also much copypasta, with lots of people copy and pasting the tweet content. Many tweeps have raised concerns about whether madogs93 is lying, largely provoked by the odd turn of phrase '1600 bedder'. Let's look at some other inconsistencies though...
4/ Firstly, which hospital does Madogs93 work in? There's only two 1600 + 'bedders' in the UK; Manchester & Glasgow. Madogs claims to work in Scotland, which narrows it down. It must be Queen Elizabeth University Hospital in Glasgow. Also Madogs93 had said she works in Scotland
5/ Bizarrely, Madogs, who claims to be a pro Trump psych nurse, has denied there were any covid19 cases in QEUH. On Aug 30th, she said they had NO Covid cases. On Sept 19, they had virtually NO confirmed cases (so presumably some between aug 30 & sept 19). Then on Sep 22 she says
6/ they had had no confirmed covid19 cases for past 3 months (erm wut). Anyway, glaring inconsistencies aside, it is clearly not true. Check out this article, for example, about a man meeting his very sick father on the Covid19 ward at QEUH in April scotsman.com/news/opinion/c…
7/ Weird Madogs93 doesn't mention too that in October a ward at QEUH was closed down due to a covid19 outbreak. Awks
8/ So either @madogs93 is some influence troll or a woefully inconsistent, uninformed or dodgy nurse at one of the UK's most covid19 free 1600 bedders. With 1600 retweets, by predominantly anti-EU and pro Brexit types, it is clear that this disinfo appeals the Farage set
9/ and sadly, might give them ammo (however false) to share in their own networks (I READ THIS STUFF FROM A NURSE ON TWITTER). It is clear from her account she dedicates a lot of time trying to underplay severity of covid19 - which seems odd for a nurse. Anyway, bye!
10/ Update - the account has now been suspended:
Another strange element to this is that madogs has claimed she was a nurse for years - so the identity is well established.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marc Owen Jones

Marc Owen Jones Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marcowenjones

25 Oct
I am kind of fascinated by boycotts, or rather, why people choose to boycott at specific times and not others, especially living in a country that has been boycotted. Recently I've been thinking about Yemen, thousands of Yemenis killed by US and British made weapons,
yet no boycott of US or UK. No substantial boycott of China despite internment of millions of Uighur Muslims. Remember that boycott of GAP, but not particularly other brands equally culpable in sweatshop labour? Trump's de facto boycott of Muslim countries, done as a policy
instrument, yet no boycott of US goods. Every boycott, or potential boycott is different, but the egregiousness of the original act certainly does not seem to be the soul component in allowing something to cross the boycott threshold. I think what's theoretically interesting,
Read 4 tweets
17 Oct
[Thread] 1/ Thought it would be useful to examine e-bile/digital misogyny on Twitter, so I looked at how many people had called Congresswoman @IlhanMN four common gendered pejoratives "sl*t, b*tch, c*nt, and wh*re" between now and November 2018. The results are shocking.
2/ The scraping of tweets resulted in around 3,089 individual tweets containing insults. Bitch was the most common slur, representing around 82% of the tweets, followed by wh*re (7%), c*nt (6%) and sl*t (4%).
3/ the time series graph below shows that every month there is a variation in the amount of abuse. Presumably this volatility reflects certain political events. It is interesting to note that the distribution of insults changes temporarily in August, Sept and October 2019..
Read 5 tweets
12 Oct
[Thread] 1 Here are some of the biggest verified tweeters on the "Hillary Emails" trend yesterday, where some entity thought they'd create a buzz around five year old legitimate data dump immediately following Pompeo's announcement that all Hillary emails would be leaked. Some of
2/ the usual superspreaders are here, namely @alshaikh2 and @monther72 @halgawi etc. (previous graph is by the people who generally tweeted a lot on the hashtag). Below nodes sized by most retweeted. @Forsan_UAE making a strong show. Definitely a joint Emirate/Saudi effort here
3/ This is just a brief visualisation for my own notes. Starting to wonder if there should be a new category for fake news - "old news repurposed and reimagined as a new scoop with frequent misrepresentation of facts" #disinformation
Read 4 tweets
6 Oct
The results of the Ipsos MORI survey cited in the Fox News piece (irrelevantly) was commissioned by Cornerstone Global Associates - although this was not mentioned in the Fox News piece (thanks @anthonyjwells ) for pointing this out. As Anthony also points out, it probably
looks more credible to not highlight the fact that the poll itself was commissioned by the think tank whose report was the basis for the article itself, and whose director invoked England as being a good place to host the world cup. Instead, the Fox News piece links to a Sun
Newspaper report on the poll. The Sun article does not mention the poll was commissioned by Cornerstone Global - a good example of 'laundering' a source. One could excuse this as normal practise, but given that the article seems to be written in bad faith, and that the citation
Read 5 tweets
5 Oct
[Thread] This article should is an exemplar of bad journalism:
1) JOURNALIST BACKGROUND - the writer Ben Weinthal works for a think tank that has hosted an anti-Qatar conference and whose senior members are chummy with the UAE Ambassador in the US.

foxnews.com/world/qatar-co…
The same journalist routinely harasses academics and journalists on Twitter who live in Qatar
2) SOURCING - It cites a report by the firm Cornerstone Global's whose director, Ghanem Nuseibeh is related to the UAE's Ambassador to the UN, and who previously offered to do PR for
Qatar. A previous Cornerstone report initially cited uncritically by the BBC was softened after Cornerstone's credibility on the Gulf Crisis and World Cup was called into question
3 ) VERIFICATION. No attempts are made to verify the claims of the report,it's accepted uncritically
Read 7 tweets
27 Sep
This Newsweek article is based on a report produced by Impact SE- whose board includes a former Israeli Ambassador, a former FDD member, a member of AIPAC. Most of their reports have focused on Palestine and Muslim majority countries. They did a report on Saudi, which found
a lot of evidence of anti semitism in the curriculum which has been widely discussed. It has also done a report on the UAE - which was not a curriculum review but rather a focus on the UAE's moral education program - far more limited and does not mention anti semitism. It is
Interesting that both the UAE and Qatar report come out at the time of UAEs normalization with Israel. The report on UAE while preliminary and limited positions the UAE as a regional leader on textbook reform. Not quite sure how this could be determined without a review of other
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!