So... this is a special morning for our forecast in that there's now no more time until the election. (The model treats Election Day and Election Eve as equivalent to one another.) This has a couple of minor effects.
1. The forecast is now totally polls-based; there's no longer any prior for economics/incumbency. The weight assigned to this prior had been declining anyway so that it was close to zero, but now it's actually zero.
2. One type of uncertainty—"drift", or how much polls change between the present day and the election—is also now gone. Of course, there's still the chance that polls could be *wrong*. But there's no longer time for polls to change (though a few more will straggle in today.)
The factors (reducing the amount of uncertainty and reducing the weight assigned to the prior, which expected the race to tighten) had gradually been helping Biden. They're why his win % had been drifting upward even while the polls were basically flat or tightening by a hair.
Biden got a tiny further boost this morning (from 89% to 90%*) from this plus some decent polling for him. But now there are no longer any further gains to be had for Biden from the mere passage of time.
* Yes, just over the "clearly favored" line in our verbiage
Bottom line: our final forecast is likely to be very close to what you see now (i.e. 90/10 or thereabouts). Could it be 92/8 or 88/12? Sure. But there's so much polling in most of these states now that new polls aren't shifting things much.
Nor is there anything magical that will happen when we run the final model just after midnight.
And hey, pollsters: Please do get those polls to us by midnight! We expecting that to be our final run of the season.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I believe they don't have the Kenosha absentees counted, either, which netted like 10k for Biden.
Did DDHQ get its hands on the Milwaukee absentees? Or is this something different? All night long there hasn't been a whole lot of clarity on exactly how many uncounted votes there have been in Milwaukee County, so I really don't know.
If there's a shift in focus here, it's that we're sort of going from "make inferences about MI/WI/PA based on results from other states" to "it's close enough to the end to actually try to count the votes there." This is especially so in WI, which is faster to count than MI/PA.
You'd *infer* that Biden was in pretty good shape in WI based on his winning MN plus his large leads in pre-election polls. But it's not quite exactly what's out there beyond a lot of Milwaukee absentees, which should make the race much closer but may or may not put Biden ahead.
There are also absentee ballots left to be counted in Kenosha, apparently. The WI absentees are likely to be very blue, so a few unreported absentees here and there in non-Milwaukee cities could make a fairly big difference.
One thing that does seem clear in the Election Day numbers is that the GOP vote came out early but the vote is becoming less Republican (and more indie) over the course of the day.
e.g. in Broward County (the rare FL county where Democrats are winning the Election Day vote)
From 7am to 1030am, the vote was D38/R34/I28 (D +4)
From 1030 to 1230pm, it was D39/R31/I31 (D +8)
From 1230 to 3pm, it was D37/R26/I37 (D +11)
From 3pm to 4pm, Broward was D41/R26/I33 (D +15). So this gap keeps growing.
At the end here, our model defaults to a very "polls-only" forecast. So here's our version of a "no tossups" map based on final polling average in each state. Very unlikely that all of these turn out right as NC, ME-2, GA, OH, IA, TX all within 2 points.
If Biden beats his forecast by 3 points nationally, here's the map you wind up with instead, with OH, IA and TX flipping blue.
* Presumably we'll get some YouGov/CBS in 10 minutes here.
* Emerson's releasing polling all day.
* Monmouth in PA.
* Rumors of another round of Fox News state polls, though I'm not 100% sure about those.
* NBC/Marist hasn't released a PA poll this round so that may be coming.
* Presumably Quinnipiac has something up its sleeve?
* A handful of one-off state polls from local universities/newspapers may weigh in again, but they can be budget-constrained and timing hard to predict.
* Morning Consult has mostly been keeping its state polls paywalled, don't know if we'll get something public.
* Maybe one more round of Ipsos state polls?
Of course we'll get weird/random stuff too, a lot of which will probably herd, but this is ~the list of polls I care about.
1. In the course of our reporting on Trafalgar Group—part of the due diligence we often do while entering polls—we've learned that some of their polling was done for partisan clients that weren't clearly disclosed.
2. This doesn't neatly fit into any of our current policies, although it goes against the transparency that we generally ask of pollsters.
3. It's important to know the sponsor/client for many reasons, including that our averages handle partisan/internal polls slightly differently: fivethirtyeight.com/features/our-n…